The WHO is having to perform a diplomatic balancing act over the new COVID-19 outbreak, caught between China — whose draconian measures to contain the disease have delayed transmission to the rest of the world — and China’s critics, who say its behavior is typical of its disregard for human rights.
At every press briefing, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has defended China’s handling of the epidemic in the face of critical questions, very often from US journalists. At the end of last month, when Tedros declared a public health emergency of international concern — having put it off a week earlier under what was assumed to be pressure from Beijing — he praised China for protecting the rest of the world.
“In the past few weeks we have witnessed the emergence of a previously unknown pathogen, which has escalated into an unprecedented outbreak, and which has been met by an unprecedented response,” Tedros said. “China is to be congratulated for the extraordinary measures it has taken to contain the outbreak despite the severe social and economic impact that is having on China.”
Photo: AP
He had similar fulsome praise for Cambodia, an ally of China, which allowed the cruise ship MS Westerdam to dock after it had been turned away from other ports.
“This is an example of international solidarity we have been consistently calling for,” Tedros said. “Outbreaks can bring out the best and the worst in people.”
TAIWAN PROTESTS
Photo: EPA-EFE
Taiwan, meanwhile, has been protesting against its “very high” risk rating, which is the same as China’s and has caused other countries to impose travel bans on its citizens. Taiwan has reported just 22 cases, compared with China’s figure of more than 72,400.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Joanne Ou (歐江安) told a news conference: “We urge the WHO to be professional and neutral: break away from China’s unreasonable claim. Don’t be kidnapped by China.”
China has long blocked Taiwan’s independent membership of the WHO, considering the state part of its territory.
Tension between China and the US is playing a significant part in the handling of the outbreak, causing difficulties for the WHO as it continues to monitor the situation. Both nations have been using the situation to score points.
When Tedros visited China on Jan. 29 and met President Xi Jinping (習近平), the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that Xi attached great importance to cooperation with the WHO.
“China’s measures are not only protecting its people, but also protecting the people in the whole world,” it said.
However, it went on to suggest Tedros endorsed China’s political regime.
“Hailing the high speed and massive scale of China’s moves,” Tedros said it showed China’s efficiency and the advantages of China’s system,” it said.
Over in the US, US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross said the emergency would help the US economy.
While he mentioned on Fox Business News that this was an unfortunate disease, he said: “The fact is, it does give business yet another thing to consider when they go through their review of their supply chain. So I think it will help to accelerate the return of jobs to North America.”
While the UK and European countries have taken measures to monitor people arriving from China, US President Donald Trump announced a ban on any foreign nationals entering the country if they have been in China during the previous 14 days.
JOSTLING FOR DOMINATION
Underlying the bad feeling is the jostling of the world powers, old and new, for influence over the UN agencies. The WHO is more democratic than some others, in that every country has an equal vote at its annual assembly. In contrast, tradition holds that the head of the World Bank is always American and the head of the IMF is always a European.
The WHO is one UN body China has led. Tedros’s predecessor was Margaret Chan (陳馮富珍), who was previously director of the Hong Kong Department of Health.
However, China is not content with that. Last year, it won the race to head the Food and Agriculture Organization, in the face of stiff opposition from the US.
If it has been putting pressure on the WHO to defend its handling of the epidemic, “it is pressure that UN organizations have always had from the advancing economies,” said Osman Dar, director of the One Health Project at the Chatham House Centre on Global Health Security.
Now China’s tough handling of the COVID-19 outbreak has put the WHO and public health experts worldwide in a dilemma because, to some extent, it seems to have worked.
“Another difficulty for the WHO is that the prevailing orthodoxy around this epidemic is that these quarantine measures are a thing of the past,” Dar said. “They are no longer viable because a lot of us live in democratic societies with a lot of personal autonomy and huge transport links.”
However, China acted with a speed and completeness that took everyone by surprise and is bringing the old assumptions into question, because it has bought the rest of the world time by confining the great majority of the epidemic in one province.
“The WHO is going to have to evaluate when is it appropriate to use this nuclear option — the mass quarantining of a community or town or city — when to do it and how to do it in a humane, socially responsible way that balances people’s rights. A lot of learning will come out of this experience,” Dar said.
Sept.16 to Sept. 22 The “anti-communist train” with then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) face plastered on the engine puffed along the “sugar railway” (糖業鐵路) in May 1955, drawing enthusiastic crowds at 103 stops covering nearly 1,200km. An estimated 1.58 million spectators were treated to propaganda films, plays and received free sugar products. By this time, the state-run Taiwan Sugar Corporation (台糖, Taisugar) had managed to connect the previously separate east-west lines established by Japanese-era sugar factories, allowing the anti-communist train to travel easily from Taichung to Pingtung’s Donggang Township (東港). Last Sunday’s feature (Taiwan in Time: The sugar express) covered the inauguration of the
The corruption cases surrounding former Taipei Mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) head Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) are just one item in the endless cycle of noise and fuss obscuring Taiwan’s deep and urgent structural and social problems. Even the case itself, as James Baron observed in an excellent piece at the Diplomat last week, is only one manifestation of the greater problem of deep-rooted corruption in land development. Last week the government announced a program to permit 25,000 foreign university students, primarily from the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia, to work in Taiwan after graduation for 2-4 years. That number is a
This year’s Michelin Gourmand Bib sported 16 new entries in the 126-strong Taiwan directory. The fight for the best braised pork rice and the crispiest scallion pancake painstakingly continued, but what stood out in the lineup this year? Pang Taqueria (胖塔可利亞); Taiwan’s first Michelin-recommended Mexican restaurant. Chef Charles Chen (陳治宇) is a self-confessed Americophile, earning his chef whites at a fine-dining Latin-American fusion restaurant. But what makes this Xinyi (信義) spot stand head and shoulders above Taipei’s existing Mexican offerings? The authenticity. The produce. The care. AUTHENTIC EATS In my time on the island, I have caved too many times to
In a stark demonstration of how award-winning breakthroughs can come from the most unlikely directions, researchers have won an Ig Nobel prize for discovering that mammals can breathe through their anuses. After a series of tests on mice, rats and pigs, Japanese scientists found the animals absorb oxygen delivered through the rectum, work that underpins a clinical trial to see whether the procedure can treat respiratory failure. The team is among 10 recognized in this year’s Ig Nobel awards (see below for more), the irreverent accolades given for achievements that “first make people laugh, and then make them think.” They are not