The WHO is having to perform a diplomatic balancing act over the new COVID-19 outbreak, caught between China — whose draconian measures to contain the disease have delayed transmission to the rest of the world — and China’s critics, who say its behavior is typical of its disregard for human rights.
At every press briefing, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has defended China’s handling of the epidemic in the face of critical questions, very often from US journalists. At the end of last month, when Tedros declared a public health emergency of international concern — having put it off a week earlier under what was assumed to be pressure from Beijing — he praised China for protecting the rest of the world.
“In the past few weeks we have witnessed the emergence of a previously unknown pathogen, which has escalated into an unprecedented outbreak, and which has been met by an unprecedented response,” Tedros said. “China is to be congratulated for the extraordinary measures it has taken to contain the outbreak despite the severe social and economic impact that is having on China.”
Photo: AP
He had similar fulsome praise for Cambodia, an ally of China, which allowed the cruise ship MS Westerdam to dock after it had been turned away from other ports.
“This is an example of international solidarity we have been consistently calling for,” Tedros said. “Outbreaks can bring out the best and the worst in people.”
TAIWAN PROTESTS
Photo: EPA-EFE
Taiwan, meanwhile, has been protesting against its “very high” risk rating, which is the same as China’s and has caused other countries to impose travel bans on its citizens. Taiwan has reported just 22 cases, compared with China’s figure of more than 72,400.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Joanne Ou (歐江安) told a news conference: “We urge the WHO to be professional and neutral: break away from China’s unreasonable claim. Don’t be kidnapped by China.”
China has long blocked Taiwan’s independent membership of the WHO, considering the state part of its territory.
Tension between China and the US is playing a significant part in the handling of the outbreak, causing difficulties for the WHO as it continues to monitor the situation. Both nations have been using the situation to score points.
When Tedros visited China on Jan. 29 and met President Xi Jinping (習近平), the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that Xi attached great importance to cooperation with the WHO.
“China’s measures are not only protecting its people, but also protecting the people in the whole world,” it said.
However, it went on to suggest Tedros endorsed China’s political regime.
“Hailing the high speed and massive scale of China’s moves,” Tedros said it showed China’s efficiency and the advantages of China’s system,” it said.
Over in the US, US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross said the emergency would help the US economy.
While he mentioned on Fox Business News that this was an unfortunate disease, he said: “The fact is, it does give business yet another thing to consider when they go through their review of their supply chain. So I think it will help to accelerate the return of jobs to North America.”
While the UK and European countries have taken measures to monitor people arriving from China, US President Donald Trump announced a ban on any foreign nationals entering the country if they have been in China during the previous 14 days.
JOSTLING FOR DOMINATION
Underlying the bad feeling is the jostling of the world powers, old and new, for influence over the UN agencies. The WHO is more democratic than some others, in that every country has an equal vote at its annual assembly. In contrast, tradition holds that the head of the World Bank is always American and the head of the IMF is always a European.
The WHO is one UN body China has led. Tedros’s predecessor was Margaret Chan (陳馮富珍), who was previously director of the Hong Kong Department of Health.
However, China is not content with that. Last year, it won the race to head the Food and Agriculture Organization, in the face of stiff opposition from the US.
If it has been putting pressure on the WHO to defend its handling of the epidemic, “it is pressure that UN organizations have always had from the advancing economies,” said Osman Dar, director of the One Health Project at the Chatham House Centre on Global Health Security.
Now China’s tough handling of the COVID-19 outbreak has put the WHO and public health experts worldwide in a dilemma because, to some extent, it seems to have worked.
“Another difficulty for the WHO is that the prevailing orthodoxy around this epidemic is that these quarantine measures are a thing of the past,” Dar said. “They are no longer viable because a lot of us live in democratic societies with a lot of personal autonomy and huge transport links.”
However, China acted with a speed and completeness that took everyone by surprise and is bringing the old assumptions into question, because it has bought the rest of the world time by confining the great majority of the epidemic in one province.
“The WHO is going to have to evaluate when is it appropriate to use this nuclear option — the mass quarantining of a community or town or city — when to do it and how to do it in a humane, socially responsible way that balances people’s rights. A lot of learning will come out of this experience,” Dar said.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
By far the most jarring of the new appointments for the incoming administration is that of Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) to head the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF). That is a huge demotion for one of the most powerful figures in the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Tseng has one of the most impressive resumes in the party. He was very active during the Wild Lily Movement and his generation is now the one taking power. He has served in many of the requisite government, party and elected positions to build out a solid political profile. Elected as mayor of Taoyuan as part of the
Moritz Mieg, 22, lay face down in the rubble, the ground shaking violently beneath him. Boulders crashed down around him, some stones hitting his back. “I just hoped that it would be one big hit and over, because I did not want to be hit nearly to death and then have to slowly die,” the student from Germany tells Taipei Times. MORNING WALK Early on April 3, Mieg set out on a scenic hike through Taroko Gorge in Hualien County (花蓮). It was a fine day for it. Little did he know that the complex intersection of tectonic plates Taiwan sits
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50