We hear it all the time: the nation’s low fertility rate is a “national security issue,” per the words of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). If this goes on, forecasts show that Taiwan will be a super-aged society by 2026, which will be disastrous for the economy and society.
Meanwhile, the government is rolling out all sorts of programs to incentivize marriage and childbirth, but few seem to be effective. If it’s not about money and resources, another argument goes, blame today’s youth, who are selfish for pursuing self actualization and individual fulfillment instead of committing to carrying out their generational responsibilities.
In response, the government often places the responsibility solely on the people of child-bearing age, with a “just do your bit and procreate” attitude and increasing births as the one and only solution to the problem.
But Stuart Gietel-Basten, an associate professor of social science and public policy at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, argues in The ‘Population Problem’ in Pacific Asia that the above is too much of a one-dimensional, simplified way of seeing and addressing the problem. The “population problem” is in quotes because part of his argument is that the region’s alarmingly low fertility rate is not the problem itself, but a symptom of a larger problem within society and its institutions. That government efforts have been concentrated on treating a symptom, rather than the upstream root causes, is why they have not been working.
In short, despite the blame game, survey results show that few “aspire to be single and childless, yet a high proportion are,” Gietel-Basten writes. The desire is still there, but society has evolved in a way where the average person cannot achieve their familial ideals anymore. It’s more of a case of “thwarted dreams” and “frustrated aspirations” instead of a “generation of egoists ruthlessly pursuing their higher order Maslowian needs at the expense of having kids.”
And it is the establishment’s insistence — whether it be the government or companies or keepers of traditional morals — on maintaining the bigger picture that is the problem. Gietel-Basten quotes several times Dutch demographer Nico van Nimwegen in the book: “States get the fertility rates that they deserve.” People don’t strike because they’re selfish, as the author aptly-puts it. They strike because the system is unfair.
TIMELY BOOK
This is a timely and highly-relevant book as the nation struggles between traditional beliefs, national prosperity and individual rights and fulfillment. People want meaningful lives outside of work, but companies continue to squeeze all they can out of their employees. Women still face discrimination at work if they get pregnant, despite legal protection. Gender roles are rapidly changing, but women often are still expected to do most of the work in childcare.
Readers living in the countries studied in the book will surely identify with many of the points brought up.
For example, part of Taiwan’s exorbitant child-rearing costs that deter people from childbirth come from the growing need for cram schools and extra-curricular education. But shouldn’t that point to a failure in the nation’s public education system instead? Why has education become so relentlessly competitive that parents feel compelled to sacrifice their finances as well as the child’s well-being? There are many factors to examine instead of solely blaming people for avoiding responsibility.
The list goes on, but as Gietel-Basten notes, the world doesn’t need another book to complain about the current state of affairs. By looking at the Asia-Pacific countries and territories that suffer from dropping fertility rates — China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea, Singapore and Japan — the author looks at the issue from an exhaustive and comprehensive multidimensional perspective that refrains from seeing low fertility and aging societies as problems that simply need to be “fixed.” As the author states in the introduction, the book does not seek to slow aging or increase fertility, but to “suggest policies about policies which might make societies better for the people who live in them.”
Some of the statistical analyses can get quite dry and difficult to read for the layperson. Even though Gietel-Basten at one point asks the reader not familiar with demographic methods to “bear with me and not skip this chapter,” promising not to employ any “algebra, needless abbreviations, or methodological jargon,” it’s still quite a bit to digest. There are still many demographic terms that the untrained person will have to memorize on the spot to make sense of the ensuing pages, such as “tempo effect” and “cohort fertility rate.”
But in an academic book like this with a unconventional argument, the author needs to be extremely thorough with both quantitative and qualitative data to, layer by layer, back up his claims. For those truly interested in this imminent and complex problem, it is still worth wading through or just skimming the difficult parts to reach the conclusions.
In any event, the book essentially serves as an extended argument for an overhaul of the current system and the idea that fertility goals should not be state mandated but individual rights-based. Gietel-Basten goes as far as to argue that not even aging is necessarily bad, it’s just that the current societal institutions of these countries cannot cope with an aging society.
But while his ideals make a lot of sense, how realistic is that goal, especially in this part of the world? What Gietel-Basten looks at is a complete teardown of the system, from the labor market to public education to social insurance to gender roles and how they relate to the individual, employers and the government. It’s unlikely that it will happen any time soon in Taiwan.
On the other hand, the fact that such a radical reconfiguring may be needed to solve the fertility issue clearly shows that some kind of more drastic change is needed than what governments are currently doing. The book’s conclusion is an ideal scenario that may take decades to achieve, but it’s clear that if the nation doesn’t do something different soon, the future will be quite grim.
Sept.16 to Sept. 22 The “anti-communist train” with then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) face plastered on the engine puffed along the “sugar railway” (糖業鐵路) in May 1955, drawing enthusiastic crowds at 103 stops covering nearly 1,200km. An estimated 1.58 million spectators were treated to propaganda films, plays and received free sugar products. By this time, the state-run Taiwan Sugar Corporation (台糖, Taisugar) had managed to connect the previously separate east-west lines established by Japanese-era sugar factories, allowing the anti-communist train to travel easily from Taichung to Pingtung’s Donggang Township (東港). Last Sunday’s feature (Taiwan in Time: The sugar express) covered the inauguration of the
The corruption cases surrounding former Taipei Mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) head Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) are just one item in the endless cycle of noise and fuss obscuring Taiwan’s deep and urgent structural and social problems. Even the case itself, as James Baron observed in an excellent piece at the Diplomat last week, is only one manifestation of the greater problem of deep-rooted corruption in land development. Last week the government announced a program to permit 25,000 foreign university students, primarily from the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia, to work in Taiwan after graduation for 2-4 years. That number is a
In a stark demonstration of how award-winning breakthroughs can come from the most unlikely directions, researchers have won an Ig Nobel prize for discovering that mammals can breathe through their anuses. After a series of tests on mice, rats and pigs, Japanese scientists found the animals absorb oxygen delivered through the rectum, work that underpins a clinical trial to see whether the procedure can treat respiratory failure. The team is among 10 recognized in this year’s Ig Nobel awards (see below for more), the irreverent accolades given for achievements that “first make people laugh, and then make them think.” They are not
This Qing Dynasty trail takes hikers from renowned hot springs in the East Rift Valley, up to the top of the Coastal Mountain Range, and down to the Pacific Short vacations to eastern Taiwan often require choosing between the Rift Valley with its pineapple fields, rice paddies and broader range of amenities, or the less populated coastal route for its ocean scenery. For those who can’t decide, why not try both? The Antong Traversing Trail (安通越嶺道) provides just such an opportunity. Built 149 years ago, the trail linked up these two formerly isolated parts of the island by crossing over the Coastal Mountain Range. After decades of serving as a convenient path for local Amis, Han settlers, missionaries and smugglers, the trail fell into disuse once modern roadways were built