At a sunny Hong Kong art studio Kacey Wong gazes out through the bars of a cage, painted communist red — his work a protest in a city struggling to square its vast cultural ambitions with an increasingly assertive Beijing.
Better known for its high-end commercial galleries — and glamorous fairs like last month’s Art Basel — Hong Kong is striving to turn itself into a cultural heavyweight through a spate of new multimillion-dollar public art spaces.
But local artists warn Beijing’s growing influence is creating a climate of fear that is stifling creativity and threatens the nascent grassroots art scene Hong Kong says it wants to enrich.
Photo: AFP
“The way I look at it is that all government-supported art space... is already not safe,” said Wong, who sat in his cage outside Hong Kong’s government headquarters last July 1 — the anniversary of the city’s return to China by Britain.
“The red line is invisible and it’s shifting all the time,” Wong, 49, said.
Hong Kong has rights unseen on the mainland but fears they are being steadily eroded were compounded last year when a highly-anticipated show by Chinese political cartoonist Badiucao (巴丟草) was canceled, with organizers citing threats made by the Chinese authorities.
Talks by dissident author Ma Jian (馬建) were pulled just a week later by the new Tai Kwun arts centre, before being reinstated at the last moment.
The freedom of the city’s publishing has also taken a hit, with five booksellers known for printing gossipy titles about China’s leaders disappearing in 2015 and resurfacing in custody on the mainland.
‘OBEDIENT ARTISTS’
The unprecedented challenges to freedom of expression come at a time of staggering public investment in Hong Kong arts and culture.
As well as Tai Kwun — a US$484 million renovation of a former colonial prison and police station led by The Hong Kong Jockey Club in partnership with the government — there is the 60,000-square-meter harborfront M+ gallery due to open next year.
M+ and the Xiqu centre, a recently-opened Chinese opera venue, are part of the vast West Kowloon Cultural District costing upwards of US$2.8 billion.
The city’s Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) has said that West Kowloon’s success would “elevate the status of Hong Kong to among the great cities of the world”.
But others fear Hong Kong could follow the model of Singapore, which has a thriving, government-supported arts scene but is at the mercy of authorities who can withhold or withdraw funding if work is deemed to breach their guidelines.
Critics say this pushes locally-based creatives to self-censor and avoid delving too deeply into topics deemed sensitive by the government.
“Tai Kwun and West Kowloon will provide opportunities,” said Wen Yau, a PhD student researching artist participation in social movements at Hong Kong Baptist University.
“So it’s quite an easy way to get all these people in and they will be obedient artists because once you depend on the funding it’s hard to say no.”
Cosmin Costinas — the director of Para Site, one of Hong Kong’s oldest contemporary art centers — said the city’s artists were not yet self-censoring, but admitted censorship was a problem, albeit one caused primarily by middle men.
“I think it’s important to understand that the majority of them (censorship cases) have not come directly from sources of power but from different intermediaries that were themselves afraid,” he said.
His words echoed the experience of AFP. West Kowloon’s press office refused to allow directors at M+ and the Xiqu centre to be interviewed on this subject and a Tai Kwun press officer also turned down an interview on behalf of Tobias Berger, head of arts.
One exception was Eve Tam (譚美兒), director of the Hong Kong Museum of Art — due to reopen later this year after a revamp — who said she would give “freehand to the artist to have their own position” on sensitive issues.
‘CAN’T HELP THEIR HOMELAND’
Still, some creatives aren’t taking any chances.
“Some of my artist friends moved away, to Germany and to Taiwan. They don’t want to stay in Hong Kong,” said Man Chan, 32, an artist and assistant at Wong’s studio. “Of course they are angry but however hard they try they can’t help their homeland. So they just go.”
Even among those who remain in Hong Kong, some have sent their work abroad. Last year hand-drawn sketches of Hong Kong’s 2014 Umbrella Movement — month’s-long pro-democracy demonstrations — were part of an exhibition on dissent at London’s British Museum.
M+ said at the time it was still “carefully evaluating this recent past” and was not considering the works for its collection.
But there are young artists in Hong Kong who are still fighting on their home turf.
“I’ve always been someone who cares about Hong Kong and an artist who’s willing to discuss these topics through my creations,” said Siu Wai-hang, 32, whose video work depicting the July 1 pro-democracy protest won the Hong Kong Human Rights Art Prize in 2018.
Wong agrees.
“Don’t think people will just totally give up and won’t do anything even in a super suppressive regime. People will be doing Banksy-like (works). There’ll be invisible platforms.”
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
On April 17, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) launched a bold campaign to revive and revitalize the KMT base by calling for an impromptu rally at the Taipei prosecutor’s offices to protest recent arrests of KMT recall campaigners over allegations of forgery and fraud involving signatures of dead voters. The protest had no time to apply for permits and was illegal, but that played into the sense of opposition grievance at alleged weaponization of the judiciary by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to “annihilate” the opposition parties. Blamed for faltering recall campaigns and faced with a KMT chair
Article 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文) stipulates that upon a vote of no confidence in the premier, the president can dissolve the legislature within 10 days. If the legislature is dissolved, a new legislative election must be held within 60 days, and the legislators’ terms will then be reckoned from that election. Two weeks ago Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) proposed that the legislature hold a vote of no confidence in the premier and dare the president to dissolve the legislature. The legislature is currently controlled
RSS