Living the high life — growing up, in other words, at extreme altitude — forces a developing human body to conserve energy, and that can translated into shorter arms, according to a study published Wednesday.
Nepalese men and women born and raised at 3,500 meters and up are more likely to have curtailed forearms compared to people of similar ancestry from lowland areas, scientists reported in the journal Royal Society Open Science.
Intriguingly, adjoining parts of the anatomy — the upper arms and hand — remain the same for both groups.
Photo: AFP
A similar pattern was uncovered in earlier research among Peruvian children, reinforcing the notion that harsh mountain conditions were somehow responsible.
“It was interesting to see that they both followed the same growth patterns,” lead author Stephanie Payne, a biological anthropologist at the University of Cambridge, said.
The findings raise a host of questions, starting with this one: What is it about an high-altitude living that makes the body shape-shift?
“This is most likely an adaptation to improving oxygen uptake,” Payne said.
For similar reasons, indigenous peoples of the Himalayas and Andes often have barrel chests, the better to expand lung capacity and take in more oxygen.
Although air contains 21 percent oxygen at all altitudes, it feels as if there is less of it in the mountains due to lower air pressure.
Using the measure of “effective oxygen”, the level drops by just under 40 percent at 3,500 meters compared to sea level.
In high-mountain regions, low oxygen availability results in inefficient conversion of food into energy, which means that there is less energy available for growth. This become especially true when combined with a nutrient poor diet.
NOT EVOLUTION
But what possible advantage is there to diminished forearms and lower legs, which also tend to be foreshortened among mountain-folk? And why not other parts of the body?
It is not so much that there is something to gain, but more that there is nothing lost, the study conjectured.
“The human body prioritizes which segments to grow when there is limited energy available for growth, such as at high altitude,” said Payne.
“The full growth of the hand may be essential for manual dexterity, whilst the length of the upper arm is particularly important for strength.”
But a shorter lower arm is apparently something humans can live with.
To conduct the study, Payne and colleagues from Nepal and Canada trekked for two days — with yaks hauling scientific equipment over mountain passes — to Namche Bazaar on the Everest Trail, getting more than a taste of altitude sickness along the way.
Humans, like all living creatures, change in response to evolutionary pressures through the process of natural selection. Chance genetic mutations that turn out to confer an advantage enhance the chances of survival, and of being passed along to offspring.
But Payne doubts that evolution is at work in this case. Rather, she said, the bodies of people born into the rarefied atmospheres of the Andes or the Himalayas react and adapt in real time, probably from the fetal stage.
The exact biological mechanism, however, resulting in shorter forearms remains a mystery.
“It might be related to temperature changes or altered blood flow down the limb during growth, or differences in nutrient delivery between limb segments,” said Payne.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50