Kids jumped on it as they would a trampoline. Adults laid on it, some wearing earphones, some reading a book — even one smoking a cigar. Most weren’t sure what it was.
As debate rages on over border security and building a wall between Mexico and the US, a fence of its own went up this month in one of the most ethnically diverse corners on earth, the New York City borough of Queens.
The Unisphere in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park is among the spaces in New York chosen for Ai Weiwei: Good Fences Make Good Neighbors, an outdoor exhibition prepared by the human rights activist and prominent Chinese contemporary artist Ai Weiwei (艾未未).
Photo: Chris Fuchs
Ai brings his work to the Big Apple, long a berth for immigrants, after traveling to more than 40 refugee camps in 23 countries while filming his documentary Human Flow, an exploration into the global refugee crisis.
That one of his fences encircles the iconic globe of the 1964-1965 New York World’s Fair — a structure built to symbolize a spirit of world unity — holds significance for some who visited it one unseasonably warm Saturday late last month.
“Especially being around the Unisphere and the whole world being in the background of this, I think that’s really nice,” said Erin Little, 29, of Manhattan. “Bringing it into Queens, you can find anything and everyone here.”
Photo: Chris Fuchs
Ai Weiwei: Good Fences Make Good Neighbors is presented by the Public Art Fund, a nonprofit, and opened on Oct. 12. The title takes its name from an old adage quoted in the Robert Frost poem Mending Wall, in which two neighbors discuss whether a stone partition is necessary for separating their property.
The exhibition features fence installations at, among other locations, Manhattan’s Washington Square Arch and the Doris C Freedman Plaza at Central Park, in addition to the one in Queens. In all, it includes related works at bus shelters, on lampposts and at private buildings at more than 300 locations across the city’s five boroughs.
“Collectively, these elements comprise a passionate response to the global migration crisis and a reflection on the profound social and political impulse to divide people from each other,” writes the Public Art Fund.
LAID-BACK WORK
While the Manhattan sites have received a lot of attention — including protests from some over the Washington Square Arch structure — the Flushing Meadows-Corona Park one has flown largely under the radar, park-goers here said.
At first blush, the undulating netted fence, constructed with rope and interconnected with metal frames of various shapes, resembles a hammock.
And, of course, a natural response to seeing a hammock is to lay down on it.
That’s exactly what Liu Pin, 36, was doing while his wife, Zhang Bin, watched over their four small children who jumped and climbed all over Ai’s installation.
“It’s comfortable,” said 30-year-old Zhang, speaking in Mandarin.
The couple, immigrants from Fujian Province, China, knew about Ai, a frequent critic of Beijing whom the Chinese government once arrested, detained and stripped of his passport, returning it only in 2015.
But neither had heard anything about the exhibit, they said.
“This is the first day we saw this,” Zhang said.
Liu added that he initially assumed it was something provided as a government benefit for leisure.
Zhang and Liu, of Queens, were not alone in their confusion. Colin McGivern, who was with his wife, Gin Cheng, and their two children, were also stumped when asked about the installation.
“I thought it was a barrier,” Cheng, 35, said.
“I thought it was a tunnel for kids to crawl through,” McGivern, 40, added.
McGivern, it turns out, was partially correct. A few kids discovered an open slit in one segment of the exhibit and clambered around inside. (It wasn’t immediately clear if the opening was created by the artist or by visitors.)
Little, the 29-year-old from Manhattan, said she had heard about Ai’s installation at Washington Square Park, but not the one at Flushing Meadows-Corona Park, aptly entitled Circle Fence.
She stumbled upon it after walking over from volunteering at the zoo.
“I thought it was really cool,” Little said. “I thought it was unique that everybody was kind of all together. And it looked like a great place to read for a little bit and enjoy the beautiful day.”
Like Little, most park-goers came to bask in the brilliant sunshine of a balmy October afternoon, delighting in weather that has tricked many New Yorkers into believing it’s Spring instead of Fall.
As the Mister Softee ice cream truck jingle played in the background, kids treated Circle Fence like their own personal jungle gym. Most adults took a more reserved approach, lounging on it to rest, close their eyes, read a book or take selfies. Teenagers fell somewhere in between.
SMALL WORLD AFTER ALL
It was a classic New York moment in a borough that boasts the city’s largest percentage of people born outside the US and that, according to New York State, is considered “the most ethnically diverse urban area in the world.”
And that’s when for some, the significance of Ai’s work began to set in.
Little made an observation, one she didn’t realize until she had laid down — the fence moves every time people hop on or adjust themselves.
That, she believed, had meaning.
“We’re all connected, so even if you’re building up these fences between all these people, we’re still all together and all connected,” Little said.
Zhang and Liu, the couple from China, thought out loud about Ai’s installation — and the meaning of fences and community — as a reporter explained the background of the exhibition to them.
“If we’re laying over here and someone suddenly sits down over there, we’ll feel it over here,” Zhang said.
“If we lay down here, we’ll disturb people over there,” Liu added.
“Wow,” he said. “This has many deep layers of meaning to it, right? Such a strong artistic sense... Subtle yet profound.”
“Ai Weiwei: Good Fences Make Good Neighbors” runs until Feb. 11 next year.
Sept.16 to Sept. 22 The “anti-communist train” with then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) face plastered on the engine puffed along the “sugar railway” (糖業鐵路) in May 1955, drawing enthusiastic crowds at 103 stops covering nearly 1,200km. An estimated 1.58 million spectators were treated to propaganda films, plays and received free sugar products. By this time, the state-run Taiwan Sugar Corporation (台糖, Taisugar) had managed to connect the previously separate east-west lines established by Japanese-era sugar factories, allowing the anti-communist train to travel easily from Taichung to Pingtung’s Donggang Township (東港). Last Sunday’s feature (Taiwan in Time: The sugar express) covered the inauguration of the
The corruption cases surrounding former Taipei Mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) head Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) are just one item in the endless cycle of noise and fuss obscuring Taiwan’s deep and urgent structural and social problems. Even the case itself, as James Baron observed in an excellent piece at the Diplomat last week, is only one manifestation of the greater problem of deep-rooted corruption in land development. Last week the government announced a program to permit 25,000 foreign university students, primarily from the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia, to work in Taiwan after graduation for 2-4 years. That number is a
This year’s Michelin Gourmand Bib sported 16 new entries in the 126-strong Taiwan directory. The fight for the best braised pork rice and the crispiest scallion pancake painstakingly continued, but what stood out in the lineup this year? Pang Taqueria (胖塔可利亞); Taiwan’s first Michelin-recommended Mexican restaurant. Chef Charles Chen (陳治宇) is a self-confessed Americophile, earning his chef whites at a fine-dining Latin-American fusion restaurant. But what makes this Xinyi (信義) spot stand head and shoulders above Taipei’s existing Mexican offerings? The authenticity. The produce. The care. AUTHENTIC EATS In my time on the island, I have caved too many times to
In the aftermath of the 2020 general elections the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was demoralized. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had crushed them in a second landslide in a row, with their presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) winning more votes than any in Taiwan’s history. The KMT did pick up three legislative seats, but the DPP retained an outright majority. To take responsibility for that catastrophic loss, as is customary, party chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) resigned. This would mark the end of an era of how the party operated and the beginning of a new effort at reform, first under