Only one other person was in the theater while this film was reviewed — a middle aged man, which raised questions as to why he would come watch this saccharine mush-fest, presumably targeted toward teenage girls, by himself. But that’s his business.
The point is, the two of us snickered and cackled throughout the entire ordeal, which is probably the only way for realists to enjoy it — by making light of the absurdity of it all while wondering what kind of person would actually buy this stuff.
But if you do happen to be one of those rare dreamers in this dark age of romance who actually believes in fairy-tale endings, then this film is definitely for you. Here’s a sample scenario: girl has crush on boy during college, boy is crying in the library after a failed exam, girl comforts boy without either one looking at each other, boy keeps the handkerchief she gives him to wipe his tears for years, vowing to marry the girl if they meet again. They finally meet again when she works for a wedding company named Seed of Happiness while he runs a date farm also named Happiness.
Photo courtesy of atmovies.com
Moved to tears? Hurry up and go watch the film.
As in all fairy tales brought into real-life scenarios, there’s something rather unsettling about the kind of obsessive, unrequited love that most characters display in this film — especially the main character, A-Le (Harry Chang, 張懷秋), whose attempts to persuade Peipei (Xiang Jin, 項瑾) to forget her dead lover (who happens to be A-Le’s cousin) and accept him turns zealous and unreasonable.
There’s really nothing romantic about someone shoving their love in your face while you’re still in mourning (even though it has been a while). Worst of all, the dead cousin also strongly encourages Peipei to date A-Le from the afterlife through his postmarked letters because he knows that A-Le truly cares about Peipei. But did anyone ask Peipei’s what she wanted? Are you supposed to marry someone just because he deeply cares about you more than anything in the world, regardless of your feelings?
With many violent crimes in society committed by obsessive lovers these days, perhaps we should tone this obsession thing down a bit in the movies. It may be romantic, but it’s not always healthy.
Anyhow, the plot revolves around Peipei, who runs a wedding studio financed by A-Le, who keeps showing up uninvited despite Peipei’s repeated attempts to shoo him away. They become somewhat romance detectives as they solve their clients’ problems — going as far as to chase down the bride’s ex-boyfriend who is trying to stop the wedding in a Jackie Chan-esque (成龍) sequence. The clients come with all types of issues, and Peipei, A-Le and their comical team are here to deliver.
Despite the aforementioned gripes, there is entertainment value in this film. The pacing is brisk, there are plenty of laughs, you have romantic interludes with the lyrics on screen and they manage to make the sappiest moments silly to relieve some of the cringe. Despite all the questionable dialogue and ridiculous premise, at least it’s not boring, and the fairy-tale mood keeps you from questioning the absurd parts as it’s clear that the movie is not rooted in reality.
The production, while not particularly impressive, is slick and steady except for one problem: most of the character don’t seem to deliver their lines directly. Instead, they sound obviously dubbed and cartoonish. This includes both male and female leads. This is fine if done right, but it brings up an issue this reviewer has had with movies and cartoons dubbed in Chinese for decades: why do they never sound like how real humans speak?
Finally, as in most Taiwanese films of this ilk, the characters have to live in super picturesque, European-style dwellings that are always conveniently located on a hill by the ocean with marvelous views. In fact, it looks almost exactly like the house in the film previously reviewed by the Taipei Times, Never Ending Road (地圖的盡頭).
Well, it’s a fairy tale, after all.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50