Last week the Executive Yuan announced measures that would initiate the breakup of Taiwan Power Co’s (Taipower, 台電) monopoly in the name of enhancing the generation of green power. The government is making good on its election commitment to amend the Electricity Act (電業法) by allowing renewable energy companies to sell direct to the grid, without having to use Taipower as an intermediary. This move is viewed as a direct means of encouraging the growth of green power in Taiwan.
Indeed, there seems to be a genuine green shift underway. The government announced its firm intention of reaching a target of 20 gigawatts (GW) of solar power to be online by 2025 — more than enough to compensate for nuclear power plants anticipated to be taken offline by then. Vice President Chen Chien-Jen (陳建仁) stated that this goal would call for investment of NT$1.2 trillion (US$38 billion) — bringing Taiwan abreast of world leaders in green energy.
And Taipower itself launched a new offshore wind power company, with a goal of building its first offshore power plant rated at 110 megawatts (MW) by 2020, with a budget of NT$19.5 billion.
Photo: Chang tsong-chiu
How times have changed.
Three years ago, we published an article, “China key to Taiwan energy crisis (page 8 of Taipei Times, Apr. 15, 2013). At the time, Taiwan was embroiled in endless debates over its commitment to nuclear power, a commitment that precluded a shift to more secure renewable energy sources. We argued that Taiwan’s obsession with nuclear power obscured other energy options. In particular, we argued that the country could extend its great successes in IT, semiconductors and flat panel displays to the next great technological challenge, namely renewable energy. We pointed to the example of China and its green energy strategy which is gradually replacing its black, fossil fueled strategy, thereby enhancing China’s energy security as well as building renewable energy industries as export platforms for the future.
NEW GREEN ENERGY POLICY
Graphic courtesy of PV Magazine/Harald Schutt
Three years on, the situation in Taiwan is completely different. The transfer of power from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) at both the executive and legislative level in January has led to a new green energy strategy. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) is taking Taiwan in a new energy direction, headlined by a commitment for Taiwan to be nuclear-free by 2025. That opens the way to an alternative energy strategy, now focused on building Taiwan’s strength in solar photovoltaic (PV) and offshore wind power.
New targets like the one just announced for solar power in 2025 are providing the investment certainty that the previous nuclear preoccupations had denied. The government has been backing its energy targets with talk of total investment of NT$1.5 trillion, induced initially by government expenditure and then followed by foreign capital and domestic investment. As the power monopoly, and with a nod to the new government policy, Taipower has already announced an investment target of NT$400 billion in the development of renewable energy (mainly in solar and wind power) up to 2025. So things are on the move on the energy front in Taiwan.
The main initiative since the election has been the announced moratorium on nuclear power and a commitment to phase it out completely by 2025. Taiwan has three nuclear power sites in operation, with a total capacity of 5.1GW. A fourth nuclear power plant was completed last year, but it was mothballed as soon as the construction was finished due to social pressure for a nuclear-free homeland.
The recent announcements have elaborated on the stated government policies to replace these nuclear plants and build 20GW of solar power by 2025 as well as 3GW of offshore wind power — which on their own would be sufficient to replace the nuclear power plants as they are mothballed. An initial step toward this goal is a projected doubling of solar PV power generating capacity to reach 1.4GW by next year. As a means of coordinating green energy initiatives with a view to reducing Taiwan’s carbon emissions, the Executive Yuan in July created an office for energy and carbon-reduction.
SOLAR AND WIND POWER
At this stage the best prospects for Taiwan would appear to be solar PV systems and offshore wind because they are now mature technologies where Taiwan already has industrial experience and can utilize its fast follower strategies to good effect, while investing in research and development R&D to bring it abreast of world leaders.
Taiwan is already the world’s second largest producer of solar cells, shipping 10.6GW of cells last year — nearly a fifth of the world total of 55GW. Taiwan is also one of the leading solar wafer and module makers in the world, with well-established firms like Motech Industries (茂迪), Gintech Energy Corp (昱晶能源), Solartech Energy Corp (昇陽科技), E-Ton Solar Tech Co (益通光能) and newcomer Taiwan Solar Energy Corp (元晶太陽能) providing a solid industrial value chain. Taiwan’s solar PV production activities got under way around 2000, and by 2009 Taiwan was second producer in the world, after China.
To achieve the goal of 3GW wind power by 2025, the government is aggressively implementing the ‘thousand wind turbines’ project utilizing the Taiwan Strait, one of the world’s best offshore wind sites. The development of the offshore wind farms (apart from Taipower’s announcement last week) also includes strategic environmental assessments, infrastructure construction and fisheries compensation negotiations. The Offshore Demonstration Incentive Program originally planned to complete four demonstration turbines by last year, but was held up because the fisheries compensation negotiation is not finalized. Three demonstration wind farms are targeted for 2020.
LIBERALIZING THE ELECTRIC POWER MARKET
The main initiative involves breaking the Taipower monopoly. Like other East Asian countries, including Japan, Korea and China, Taiwan has inherited a quasi-monopoly power company, Taipower, which could be viewed as an obstacle to further greening.
Founded in 1946, Taipower generates power, buys power from a handful of independent power producers (IPPs), distributes power and manages most of the country’s retail and wholesale power activities. There have been many attempts to break the Taipower monopoly, going back at least to 2001 (postponed to 2006) — which came to nothing. Now there is new urgency, since the green power shift is clearly underway and is potentially being delayed by the Taipower monopoly.
When campaigning for the presidency, Tsai committed the government to review the country’s Electricity Act with a view to introducing greater competition and efficiency.
In mid-August, the new government reached agreement with Taipower’s labor union, making four significant concessions. First, the Ministry of Economic Affairs agreed to exclude privatization of Taipower from any proposed amendments. Second, within six to nine years (up to 2025) in two developmental stages, green power is to be directly supplied by Taipower to customers (in the first stage) while independent producers in the industrial parks will be allowed to distribute the power produced by their own power plants. In other words, the entities managing power supply and power grid are to be separated.
Third, Taipower has to be reorganized as a parent holding company with two subsidiaries for power supply and power grid responsible for distribution, transmission and sales. And fourth, any further subsidiaries would be established only if workers’ rights and interests are not affected. Such organizational restructuring of Taipower and deregulation of the power sector are aimed to encourage the dispersal of power sources and micro grid communities.
The announcements made last week go some way to implement this agreement, with market reform opening up prospects for direct sale of power by renewable energy producers. We understand that it will take time to introduce full competition to the electric power market and that a staged approach is needed.
IMPLEMENTATION OF TAIWAN MODEL
While the new government’s determination to end the nuclear power era in Taiwan is clear, we would stress that there now needs to be greater emphasis on a sustained investment strategy that will drive Taiwan’s energy production and manufacturing industries towards renewable power. This would be a continuation of Taiwan’s past successful industrial strategies. It is worth pointing out that Taiwan has the reserves needed for investment once a clear signal is given. Bank deposits in Taiwan’s banks as a whole recorded an historical high at NT$40 trillion in July of this year, according to the statistics of Taiwan’s central bank.
Taiwan has well-tested industrial development models involving the promotion of new industries through market stimulation and domestic technology leverage. For years it has been missing opportunities due to the focus on nuclear power and fossil fuels (which probably owed more to Taiwan’s geopolitical situation than to strictly energy-related concerns). Now is the time to apply the skills learned in the past to the urgent needs of cleaning up its energy system and creating new pillar industries for the future.
This article is adapted from a longer version published in Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus. John A Mathews is a professor at the Macquarie Graduate School of Management at Macquarie University. Hu Mei-chih is a professor at the Institute of Technology Management at National Tsing Hua University.
Otto von Bismarck once famously remarked that the “great European war will come out of some damn foolish thing in the Balkans.” We may have inched closer to that damn foolish thing in recent weeks. On Feb. 1, a new law came into effect in China, which codified Beijing’s claim that its well-armed Coast Guard could remove vessels in its waters “illegally” and use force against them if necessary. This is no more or less a “law” than any other law administrated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), since Beijing could use its Coast Guard to attack vessels from other
March 01 to March 07 There was only one Taiwanese department head in Taiwan’s first post-World War II provincial government: Sung Fei-ju (宋斐如), who served as deputy director of the department of education. Sung, who lived in China for over two decades, had close ties with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and was also allowed to start his own newspaper, the People’s News-Leader (人民導報). Aside from Sung, only a handful of Taiwanese held significant positions in the government, almost all of them banshan (半山, half mountain) like him. The term refers to those who moved
Taimali Township (太麻里) is about 15km south of Jhihben Township (知本) in Taitung County, a glorious ride along the electric blue Pacific coastline. Having spent several days scouting out the upper reaches of the Jhihben River gorge for possible camera trap locations for Formosan clouded leopards (Neofelis nebulosa), a friend and I decided to explore the next river drainage to the south. The Taimali River gorge is yet another remote and relatively unknown wilderness area of Taitung County that has likely never been properly surveyed for wildlife, and this is certainly the second place that I plan to search for
“Hey, what is 228 anyway?” My ears perked up when I overheard two young people sitting next to me discussing the upcoming holiday. I was eating a late dinner after spending all afternoon at the library researching and writing about some of the more obscure victims of the 228 Incident, the infamous anti-Chinese Nationalist Party uprising in 1947 that was brutally suppressed. “I have no idea,” the other replied. They proceeded to look it up online and appeared astonished at the new information, especially over the number of alleged victims. Virtually censored and seldom discussed until the late 1980s, it seems