Mexico’s 8 percent tax on high-calorie snacks has been successful in reducing junk food purchases, but only by a small amount and only among poor and middle-class households, a study said Tuesday.
The report published in the online journal PLOS-Medicine showed an average reduction of 5.1 percent in purchases of items subject to the tax, which was implemented in 2014. The reduction equaled only about 25 grams per month per person.
Poorer households bought 10.2 percent less junk food, while medium-income households bought 5.8 percent less, according to bar code analyses based of consumer-tracking data. Higher-income shoppers showed no impact at all from the new taxes. The tax applies to processed foods having more than 275 calories per 100 grams of product.
Photo: Damian Dovarganes/AP
The study did not indicate whether families reduced calorie intake, bought healthier foods or simply switched to cheaper street food — important factors for Mexico, which is plagued with high obesity rates.
The study was conducted by researchers from Mexico’s National Institute of Public Health and the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, who said future studies “should explore how these shifts are linked to changes in the nutritional quality of the overall diet.”
Nutritionist Julieta Ponce of the Center for Dietary Orientation said the study’s finding only open the debate on how to substitute empty calories in Mexicans’ diet for better-quality food.
For example, the junk food reductions noted in the study could be replaced by eating a single tortilla or a third of a cup of beans.
Ponce said the question is how to return such foods as fresh fruits and vegetables to the average Mexican’s diet on a larger scale.
“Obesity and adverse metabolic effects are also the result of the loss of the traditional diet, not just the consumption of junk food,” Ponce said. “At the moment, Mexico lacks a broader policy on eating well. For the moment, there are just emergency measures to limit the damage.”
The study is in line with a paper released late last year suggesting another Mexican tax on sugary soft drinks had achieved an average 6 percent reduction in some purchases. That tax is 1-peso (about NT$1.72) per liter.
Critics of the fast-food tax have suggested that poorer Mexicans, faced with higher pass-along prices on processed snacks sold by major companies, may simply switch to non-taxed similar foods sold by unlicensed street vendors.
The country’s streets, especially outside schools, parks, bus stops and subway stations, are crowded with vendors selling no-brand or home-made snacks that often have salt, sugar or fat counts as high as name brands.
Even name-brand chips are sometimes made worse at street stands, where vendors will open a bag of chips and douse them in an infinite variety of salty, sugary or spicy sauces.
Supporters of the tax agree that those practices, known as junk food “substitution,” could blunt the gains of tax-induced reductions, but insist they won’t erase the improvements.
“There will be a discussion about ‘substitution,’ but I don’t think any (street) product has the distribution network that these (name-brand) products have,” said Alejandro Calivillo, director of the advocacy group The Power of the Consumer. “There could be substitution in some cases, but I don’t think it would be anything significant.”
Mexico is among the fattest countries in the world. Just under one-third of adults are obese, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization.
Seven out of 10 Mexicans are overweight and the country has surpassed the US in obesity rates, mostly due to a diet of fatty foods and sugary sodas, according to a UN report.
Chen Wang-shi (陳罔市) doesn’t know where to go if she is forced to move. The 78-year-old Chen is an active “sea woman” (海女) in Taiwan’s easternmost fishing village of Makang (馬崗) in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮). When the waves are calm, she ventures out to forage for algae, oysters and other edible marine morsels. She lives alone in the village, as her children have moved to the cities for work, returning for weekends and festivals. “I cannot get used to living in Taipei, and I feel very uncomfortable if I don’t go out to the ocean to forage. I
Aug. 10 to Aug. 16 They called him the “No Problem Doctor” (沒關係醫生) because that’s what he always told his patients when they couldn’t pay up. Operating the only clinic in Changhua County’s Pusin Township (埔心) during the 1950s, Hsu Tsai-chih (許再枝) knew that life was difficult in his remote hometown. “They barely had enough to survive, so it was pointless to chase after them for the money,” an 81-year-old Hsu told the United Daily News in 2002. “I just went with the flow, some offered to pay me back years later but I had already forgotten
A widely criticized peer-reviewed study that measured the attractiveness of women with endometriosis has been retracted from the medical journal Fertility and Sterility. The study, “Attractiveness of women with rectovaginal endometriosis: a case-control study,” was first published in 2013 and has been defended by the authors and the journal in the intervening years despite heavy criticism from doctors, other researchers and people with endometriosis for its ethical concerns and dubious justifications, with one advocate calling the study “heartbreaking” and “disgusting.” The study’s conclusion was: “Women with rectovaginal endometriosis were judged to be more attractive than those in the two control groups.
Back in the 1950s, the lifeguards of Bondi Beach, Sydney, were not only charged with rescuing surfers and scanning for sharks. In their role as “beach inspectors” they were also responsible for ensuring that swimsuits conformed to New South Wales state regulations. At least 7.6cm of fabric was required over the thigh, no navels were to be exposed and shoulder straps had to be “sturdy.” One of the best-known beach inspectors was Aubrey Laidlaw, who had already laid down the law when the first bikini debuted on the beach in 1946. By the turn of the 1960s, the “Bikini Wars” were