The Moscow City Ballet’s swans have returned to Taipei for five shows at the National Theater.
At 27, the company is still a babe compared to its more famous Russian counterparts, the Mariinsky and Bolshoi ballet companies, but it has established a name for itself with competent, if somewhat stodgy, productions of the romantic classics, and its dancers come from state-runs schools in Russia and former Soviet states such as Ukraine.
The private company — a rarity in the Russian ballet world — was founded by former Bolshoi dancer-turned-choreographer Victor Smirnov-Golovanov, who died two years ago. His widow, Ludmila Nerubashenko, a former soloist with the company, is now artistic director.
Photo courtesy of moscow city ballet
The troupe’s strength is in its well-disciplined corps de ballet, crucial if you are sticking to the classics that need flocks of swans, Willies, village maidens or snowflakes who often have to perform two shows a day, as they will tomorrow and Sunday. The principal’s roles are often overshadowed by the mishmash of choreography they are expected to execute, combining the original Lev Ivanov-Marius Petip footwork with additions by Smirnov-Golovanov or other Russian choreographers.
One of the unique features of Smirnov-Golovanov’s production of Swan Lake is Odile’s half-black, half-white tutu that highlights the duality of her role, as she shows the white side to the prince, but the black to the audience.
Taiwanese ballet fans who cannot get enough of Swan Lake would appear to be in luck, as another frequent visitor to these shores, the Russian Festival Ballet, is coming next month with Swan Lake, The Nutcracker and Romeo and Juliet. However, the Moscow City Ballet’s production has better sets and staging.
Photo courtesy of mowcow city ballet
■ Tonight at 7:30pm, tomorrow at 2:30pm and 7:30pm and Sunday at 1pm and 6:30pm, National Theater (國家戲劇院), 21-1 Zhongshan S Rd, Taipei City (台北市中山南路21-1號)
■Tickets are NT$400 to 3,800, available online at www.kham.com.tw or at convenience store ticket kiosks
Sept. 1 to Sept. 7 In 1899, Kozaburo Hirai became the first documented Japanese to wed a Taiwanese under colonial rule. The soldier was partly motivated by the government’s policy of assimilating the Taiwanese population through intermarriage. While his friends and family disapproved and even mocked him, the marriage endured. By 1930, when his story appeared in Tales of Virtuous Deeds in Taiwan, Hirai had settled in his wife’s rural Changhua hometown, farming the land and integrating into local society. Similarly, Aiko Fujii, who married into the prominent Wufeng Lin Family (霧峰林家) in 1927, quickly learned Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) and
The low voter turnout for the referendum on Aug. 23 shows that many Taiwanese are apathetic about nuclear energy, but there are long-term energy stakes involved that the public needs to grasp Taiwan faces an energy trilemma: soaring AI-driven demand, pressure to cut carbon and reliance on fragile fuel imports. But the nuclear referendum on Aug. 23 showed how little this registered with voters, many of whom neither see the long game nor grasp the stakes. Volunteer referendum worker Vivian Chen (陳薇安) put it bluntly: “I’ve seen many people asking what they’re voting for when they arrive to vote. They cast their vote without even doing any research.” Imagine Taiwanese voters invited to a poker table. The bet looked simple — yes or no — yet most never showed. More than two-thirds of those
In the run-up to the referendum on re-opening Pingtung County’s Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant last month, the media inundated us with explainers. A favorite factoid of the international media, endlessly recycled, was that Taiwan has no energy reserves for a blockade, thus necessitating re-opening the nuclear plants. As presented by the Chinese-language CommonWealth Magazine, it runs: “According to the US Department of Commerce International Trade Administration, 97.73 percent of Taiwan’s energy is imported, and estimates are that Taiwan has only 11 days of reserves available in the event of a blockade.” This factoid is not an outright lie — that
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) yesterday paraded its military hardware in an effort to impress its own population, intimidate its enemies and rewrite history. As always, this was paced by a blizzard of articles and commentaries in the media, a reminder that Beijing’s lies must be accompanied by a bodyguard of lies. A typical example is this piece by Zheng Wang (汪錚) of Seton Hall in the Diplomat. “In Taiwan, 2025 also marks 80 years since the island’s return to China at the end of the war — a historical milestone largely omitted in official commemorations.” The reason for its