Attorney Steven Wise is on a crusade to prove that, as a matter of law, chimps are people too.
For that matter, so are dolphins, elephants, gorillas and orcas.
Wise made his argument at the TED Conference that wrapped up in Vancouver, Canada on Friday.
PHOTO: AFP
“I had to invent the field of animal juris prudence,” Wise told AFP at TED.
“Coming here is implicit affirmation that people are interested in what we have to say.”
Wise argued that apes, chimps, elephants and orcas are as entitled to the rights of “persons” under law as are people or corporations.
Legal systems around the world have granted rights of personhood to holy scripts, mosques, companies and even a river.
“Personhood is not a biological concept, it is a public policy concept,” Wise said.
“The legal system decides it; human being is not synonymous with person.”
He has devoted decades to the cause, which is now making its way through courts in the US state of New York.
ANIMAL SLAVERY?
Wise, president of the Nonhuman Rights Project, is hoping a legal tactic successful in getting a slave legally transformed from property to person in a historic case in Britain will do the same for chimpanzees and other animals.
He will use the writ of habeas corpus, in which judges order prisoners or detainees brought before the court. Such writs, by definition, assign rights of personhood to those targeted.
Members of the project found chimpanzees in abysmal conditions in several parts of the state of New York, then filed for writs of habeas corpus in respective courts to get the animals moved to a refuge.
Reactions from judges have been mixed, with even sympathetic members of the bench averse to breaching the legal wall separating people from animals, according to Wise.
“Even in America, no judge wants to be the first to make this leap of faith,” the animal rights champion said.
Wise, author of Rattling the Cage and other works defending animal rights, has been waging this legal battle since the early 1980s.
“They truly are slaves,” Wise said of chimps, bonobos and other animals proven to have feelings, memories, language, foresight and other traits considered human.
“I realized there was no one looking out for their interests and they were just being exploited.”
He recalled being met with hostility and ridicule early in the battle. Rival lawyers would bark when he walked into courtrooms.
After decades of laying groundwork and gathering allies, Wise and his team filed an opening salvo of lawsuits in New York about two years ago.
“We are going state by state, animal by animal and we are going to lose a lot before we start to win,” he said.
“I expect to win, and not all that far into the future.”
TIDE OF HISTORY
Victory would come in the form of a non-human animal being legally recognized as a person for some purpose, no matter how limited.
“Once that wall is pierced, judges will realize that they have to make more nuanced, rational decisions,” Wise said of establishing that some animals have a right to be treated better than mere property.
Wise is working with lawyers in Europe, Argentina and other parts of the world.
“I think there is a tide of history and judges need to swim with it and not against it,” Wise said.
“Orcas, apes, chimps and elephants should at least have the right to bodily liberty. I am not talking the entire animal kingdom, but lines have to be drawn.”
The Nonhuman Rights Project is looking to hit US courts with its next case, on behalf of circus elephants, late this year.
“I think it may change the way people view entities that aren’t human,” Wise said of his quest.
“They may not have the knee-jerk reaction that we can exploit them.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50