Public prosecutors in Augsburg have announced that they will release the artworks they seized from the home of reclusive collector Cornelius Gurlitt two years ago, making the 81-year-old once again the legal owner of the most contentious private collection in recent German history.
While the artworks’ legal status may have changed, they are likely to remain in a secret location in Bavaria for now. Gurlitt signed an agreement with German authorities on Monday to allow a taskforce of experts to continue examining the providence of the works for another year — a process which is under increasing criticism for its slow progress and lack of transparency.
In 2012, 1,280 works including pieces by Picasso, Chagall and Matisse were seized from Gurlitt’s Munich home by investigators who suspected some of them had originally been looted by the Nazis. When the find was made public in November last year, many hoped that any stolen works in the collection would eventually be returned to the descendants of the rightful owners, many of them Jewish collectors.
Photo: AFP
But five months later, the case has become caught up in bureaucracy. On Wednesday, the public prosecutor in Augsburg had to give in to a complaint from Gurlitt’s lawyers and release the hoard. While Gurlitt is still being investigated for possible tax evasion, he is now once again the rightful owner of the pictures, unless it can be proved that some of them count as looted art.
Stephan Holzinger, a spokesman for Gurlitt, said the ruling was a significant step in redeeming the collector’s name: “This is a good day for Cornelius Gurlitt,” Holzinger said in a statement. Around 500 artworks were originally suspected of having been looted by the Nazis, though Gurlitt’s legal team puts the number much lower.
Holzinger told the Guardian that 300 to 350 works were owned by the Gurlitt family before Hitler came to power. Gurlitt’s lawyers said they were aware of only seven restitution claims so far, including two claims for Henri Matisse’s painting Seated Woman.
It remains unclear where the works will eventually end up — Gurlitt’s spokesperson said he would not comment “for security reasons.” Keeping the collection safe in Gurlitt’s homes in Munich or Salzburg is presumably out of the question, given that their locations have been widely reported.
Some Bavarian politicians have already suggested they should be stored in a museum, where they could be seen by the public — an option that Holzinger seemed to reject, saying it was questionable “whether the Bavarian state should be rewarded for its disproportionate actions towards Mr Gurlitt.” Gurlitt himself is currently in hospital.
Meanwhile, criticism of the Bavarian state prosecutor’s handling of the case is mounting. Sabine Rudolph, a restitution expert and lawyer who represents the descendants of the Dresden art collector Fritz Salo Glaser, criticized the state taskforce’s slow progress and lack of transparency. “Every time we see signs of progress, there is another catch,” she told the Guardian.
Rudolph has written to the Augsburg state prosecutors four times, requesting access to documents that might illuminate how 13 works from Glaser’s collection ended up in Gurlitt’s hands. But after five months she feels no significant progress has been made. “A better taskforce would have put some of the key documents online,” she said, criticizing the choice of experts as “political” and saying that few art historians had been commissioned to work on the collection full-time.
In a statement, Ingeborg Berggreen-Merkel, the leader of the taskforce, welcomed the decision to release the pictures back into Gurlitt’s hands, since it would allow “a more transparent display of the taskforce’s working methods.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50