Tribute, by John Newman
The relationship between dance music and soul singers has always been symbiotic. Dance music producers need the grit and texture of a human voice to flesh out their songs, and singers need a context in which to be heard, even if it’s not their native style. This has been going on, especially in England, for decades, though more often it’s the singers who’ve played second fiddle.
Enter John Newman, a veritable Fatboy Slim sample come to life, and part of the current stream of young British singers who got their starts singing on club records. (See also the excellent Sam Smith, who broke through on a song by the garage revivalists Disclosure and is soon to release a solo debut.)
Newman got his break singing on Feel the Love and Not Giving In, a pair of singles by Rudimental, a sort of organic club music outfit that’s been among the most popular young British acts of the last couple of years.
In environments like that, voices full of character do the trick best, and Newman’s tone is signature. He’s got a 1950s-informed nasal, narrow voice that he squeezes out with real power, finished off with a scratchy edge. It’s a success at cutting through even the most propulsive of beats.
But Newman has different designs with his first album Tribute (Republic), which debuted at No. 1 in Britain in October and is just being released here.
Notionally, there is dance music here, especially on the peppy and bright single Love Me Again, which sounds like a big beat song in which the singer wins out over the producer and culminates in a swell of Billy Joel keyboard attitude.
Losing Sleep and Cheating owe a great deal to the modern soul revivalism pioneered by Amy Winehouse and her early producers, and Newman is clearly obsessed with vintage soul: The video for Love Me Again features a group of convincing Northern soul dancers. But he may truly be the inheritor of the flamboyant piano-soul-man tradition, in the vein of Joel and Elton John (even if piano isn’t really his instrument).
His singing is strong throughout, and the way he falls off the notes, as in Out of My Head, smacks of maturity and flair. And he’s a traditionalist as a songwriter. (Newman receives a writing credit on every track here.) He’s given to familiar swelling arcs and circumstances of impossible love, as on the magisterial Easy.
Taken all together, there are indications he wants to be part of an even more powerful British tradition than dance music: The pageantry of Running and Gold Dust echo Adele echoing Shirley Bassey. Maybe he’s advertising his availability for the next Bond theme song. (Newman will play the Bowery Ballroom on Thursday.)
— Jon Caramanica, NY Times News Service
Wig Out at Jagbags, by Stephen Malkmus & the Jicks
Stephen Malkmus keeps his listeners guessing, from song to song and sometimes from moment to moment. His guitar-centered band, the Jicks, alludes to styles from the 1960s to the 1990s, twisting them all with a shifty meter, a wandering chord progression, a melodic detour, a willful swerve. His lyrics free-associate, assuming various personas with frequent glimpses of lucidity. The songs can be candid, arch, ingenious, arbitrary, revealing, mocking, exalted, trivial, ramshackle, ironclad, parodic, inventive, succinct and meandering. What they’re not, usually, is single-minded.
Yet on Wig Out at Jagbags, his sixth album, Malkmus gets backhandedly blunt with Rumble at the Rainbo, a sardonic look at a band’s reunion tour like the one he did in 2010 with his former band Pavement, which was revered by college radio in the 1990s. “We are returning, returning to our roots/No new material — just cowboy boots,” he sings, then vows, “No one here has changed and no one ever will.”
Malkmus, 47, is well aware of change and unabashed about being a grown-up. Yet he has brought a lighter touch to each Jicks album. At first he put distance between the Jicks and Pavement with long instrumental interludes: jam-band improvisations or prog-rock compositions. Now he’s more concise, tucking every song’s whims into under six minutes.
Thoughts of passing time do pop up often on the new album, usually to be shrugged off. In Chartjunk, Malkmus flaunts his longer perspective. “I’ve been everywhere that you’re goin’/know all that you’re knowin’ ,” he sings; then he talks back to himself, “I don’t need your windbag wisdom,” all while cruising along on a triplet beat, horns and conga drums out of early-1970s Top 40 pop.
That’s only one of the Jicks’ musical guises on this album. Malkmus and the band look back to early, labyrinthine Pink Floyd and the revved-up strumming of the Who in Surreal Teenagers, and they put a Grateful Dead-ish riff — like St. Stephen with a few more stops and starts — into Cinnamon and Lesbians. Hefty grunge guitars show up in Shibboleth, which ponders religion, and Scattegories, about party games run amok. There’s warped country-rock in Lariat and a glimmer of soul ballad in J Smoov. The credits claim the album was “recorded live” in the studio, and that’s how the music sounds: well rehearsed in all its complexities, but enthusiastic and offhand. Malkmus has written enigmas that are open to exegesis, but they also just roll on by with a whoop and a grin.
— Jon Pareles, NY Times News Service
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50