Almost everyone knows by now that this debut novel by a young, female British writer has become an international publishing phenomenon. In a matter of months 40 million copies have been sold, the fastest initial sales ever known. It’s speculated that most of the readers are women, but what the whole world is quite certain about is that the subject matter is something to do with sadomasochistic sex.
The first point to be made is that this book doesn’t read like pornography. It’s a reasonably interesting novel, though its focus on only two major characters limits its scope for plot-development. Its sex scenes are just like those in many other novels, with many of the S&M elements shadowy possibilities kept for the future rather than actual events happening before our eyes.
It may spoil the book for some, but it will be useful for others to know that during this entire 500-page novel the heroine only gets spanked (by hand) twice, has some steel balls joined by a cord inserted inside her, gets lightly stimulated with a soft-leather “flogger,” and is, in the final pages, given six hard strokes with a belt, an experience that causes her to walk out of the relationship. These scenes occupy some 20 pages.
Genuine S&M enthusiasts, in other words, are not going to get very excited over this book. They will probably read it, just out of curiosity as to what small window the world at large has gained into their world. But compared with the pornographic reading-matter specifically aimed at them, Fifty Shades of Grey is very small beer indeed.
By comparison, the regular sex in the book is extensive, and not greatly different from what’s found in a million and one bestsellers. But this is the point of the story. Seattle’s Christian Grey, 27, has had relationships with 15 willing “submissives,” girls eager for pain, before meeting Anastasia Steele, 22, and it’s the first time he’s become involved with someone with no apparent predilection for his favorite sex game. The sex he has with Anastasia is thus the first regular sex he’s ever experienced.
This, of course, allows the novel to take the protracted course it does, expanding in a leisurely way into what are now three volumes. (The two sequels are Fifty Shades Darker and Fifty Shades Freed.) Encounters with willing S&M partners would probably only allow for a book of, say, 60 pages, with sex occupying the last 50. Tension between the personalities and enthusiasms of two such different characters as these, however, are the stuff of which real novels are made.
And this is, in many respects, a real novel. The usual propositions where erotic fiction is concerned are that the writing is poor and the characters mere ciphers. Neither is the case here. The two main characters are developed in depth. And there are quite a few minor characters in the book too — Anastasia’s mother, step-father, college friends and flat-mate, Christian’s brother and man-servant, plus the much-discussed figure of the older woman, Mrs. Robinson, who initiated Christian into S&M practices when he was a boy of 15.
As for the style, it’s fluent, easy to read, but also intelligent and in places astute. Anastasia, who tells the story, is at the beginning just about to graduate in English Literature and makes comparisons of her new situation with those of Jane Eyre and Tess of the D’Urbervilles. Christian actually presents her with priceless first editions of Hardy’s novel, a gift Anastasia considers far too expensive to accept.
But lavish presents are central to Christian’s style, and indeed to his role in the novel as a whole. He is, in essence, the un-improvable young man. He’s staggeringly good-looking, extremely rich, and culturally knowledgeable — he plays the piano and expatiates on Bach and Chopin, and on Thomas Tallis’s Spem in Alium, the music that accompanies the couple’s last regular-sex session. As for his gifts, he gives Anastasia a car, a Blackberry, a state-of-the art laptop, and racks of clothes, in addition to the Hardy first editions, and up-grades her air-ticket back home to First Class.
As for the psychology, one senses it will develop further in the later volumes. Anastasia is more or less straight-forward — a virgin (though not for long) who wants true love, and sex in the context of true love. Christian is another matter. Apart from his S&M enthusiasm, he doesn’t want to be touched, had a problem mother, and as a result an unloved childhood. He wants submissive sex-slaves, but finds himself falling for the unlikely Anastasia — who initially comes to interview him for a student newspaper — in a big way.
The resulting situation is, as a result, a first for both protagonists, and huge amounts of the book are taken up with their desperation for each other, but their difficulty in getting any relationship onto a mutually-satisfactory footing. So instead we have protracted meals in the most luxurious settings imaginable, an almost endless exchange of emails, a flight in a private helicopter, constant biting of her lip by Anastasia (a habit that sends Christian wild with desire), and her occasional rolling of her eyes, something for which Christian assures her she will be punished in the Red Room of Pain.
So, has the world turned on overnight to bondage and sexual punishment? Or is it just that something of a taboo has been breached as far as main-stream literature is concerned? My feeling is that most readers are using this book to take a tentative peep behind a previously fairly impenetrable curtain, and that sales of chains and restraining handcuffs will not have noticeably increased. But, of course, you never know.
As for feminists’ objections (why should it be the woman who’s the submissive, albeit a reluctant one?) they’re right in one sense. The most famous sexual flagellants in recent history — Rousseau, Swinburne, T.E. Lawrence and (probably) A.E. Housman — have all been men, and three, if not four, of them were submissives by nature.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50