Uighur merchant Obul Kasim carries emotional scars from his confrontation with an unbending government after he failed to save his 100-year-old mud-brick home from demolition, a victim of the urban renewal marching across the historic Silk Road.
When he refused to leave his Kashgar home in the far western region of Xinjiang in 2004, police handcuffed him and took him to the local station. In 2005 and 2007, he traveled to Beijing to seek redress over what he saw as inadequate compensation, but was rounded up by provincial officials both times.
The issues are jarringly familiar.
Photo: Reuters
Kasim’s grievance is probably the most common complaint across China, but the issue takes on new ramifications in Xinjiang, where demolitions are linked by experts to attempts to eliminate the identity of Uighurs, a Turkic Muslim minority.
Uighurs make up one of the country’s most discontented minorities, resentful of the ruling Chinese Communist Party and the country’s majority Han Chinese.
“Every time I think about my housing problem, I’m so angry I can’t sit,” said Kasim, his brown eyes flashing. “No department has listened to me. My father was so angry because of this, he passed away of a heart attack.”
Photo: Reuters
Kasim, who sells embroidered skullcaps near Kashgar’s Id Kah mosque, China’s largest, said he would return to Beijing to petition after the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, though he does not expect much.
The local government offered him compensation of US$73 per square meter for his 510m2 home. High-rise apartments are now worth US$4,670 per square meter.
“A very large source of discontent is land dispossession,” Tom Cliff, a graduate student at the Australian National University who spent more than three years in Xinjiang, said in e-mailed comments. “Many Uighurs see this as their land being taken away from them with inadequate compensation and no recourse to the law.”
Gopuk Haji, a 97-year-old doctor of traditional medicine, said the government gave him a house of 80m2, even though his previous mud-brick home was 100m2. He dismissed as paltry compensation of US$1,495.
“A real communist party must help the people,” he said. “This communist party is fake. They are only using money to line their pockets.”
Sporting a long, wispy white beard and flowing white shirt, Haji said China’s former leaders Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and Zhou Enlai (周恩來) were good people. “Now the people are all bad. They are all corrupt. If you don’t have money here, you don’t have power.”
RAZED
Demolitions proceed at a furious pace across the flat, parched region around Kashgar, designated as a“special economic zone” on the Silk Road trade route linking China and Europe.
Heaps of earth and bricks dot residential quarters, while workers lay foundations for drab, modern high-rise apartments. Men in skull caps whack a camel on a dusty street as skyscrapers loom in the distance. The adobe homes with wooden doors in winding red-dirt lanes were once hailed as the best surviving example of Central Asian architecture.
Ignoring protests from preservationists, the government in 2008 razed most of Kashgar’s old city, destroying 80 percent of the mud-brick houses to build “earthquake-resistant housing.”
Managing the Uighurs has been one of the Communist Party’s biggest challenges. Tensions erupted into violent clashes between Han Chinese and Uighurs that killed nearly 200 people in the regional capital Urumqi in July 2009.
For Uighurs, Tibetans and most recently, Inner Mongolians, greater prosperity has not quelled demands for greater autonomy.
“One of the lessons that we can take from Xinjiang is that the pursuit of sheer economic growth as a solution to social problems is not working,” said Nicholas Bequelin, a China researcher for New-York-based Human Rights Watch.
Bequelin said that the rest of China may hope the government might change its policies, but “in the case of Xinjiang, Tibet and Inner Mongolia, they take to the streets to take a stand.”
Mass demolitions in Kashgar’s old city, he said, were “taken as evidence of the state’s intent to erase and destroy Uighur identity and heritage.”
Like 2009, this year has been jittery in Xinjiang, a region that accounts for a sixth of the country’s land mass, holds deposits of oil and gas and is home to 8 million Uighurs.
Many experts believe the roots of the violence in the deadly attacks in Kashgar and the desert city of Hotan stem from a deep belief among Uighurs that they have been left behind as Han Chinese pour into Xinjiang and dominate opportunities.
Dru Gladney, an expert on Uighurs at Pomona College in California, said more unrest in Xinjiang was inevitable.
“Uighurs are clearly upset with the policies there,” he said. “China thinks they can overrun the region with the Han and put in money for security services and that will ameliorate the problem. But it’s not working.”
On the first Friday of Ramadan prayers, soldiers carrying riot shields and rifles marched past the Id Kah mosque, while a paramilitary officer wearing a helmet and bullet-proof vest took videos of men streaming into the mosque with prayer mats.
Banners declared in Chinese: “Unity is a blessing, separatism is a scourge,” and “The Han will never leave the minorities.”
But mutual distrust persists.
“When they look at us, I know they have hatred in their hearts,” said a Han Chinese taxi driver from southwestern Sichuan Province.
The government has blamed the violence in Xinjiang on the separatist East Turkestan Islamic Movement, designated as a terrorist organization by the US in 2002.
Beijing says separatists work with al-Qaeda or militants among other Turkic ethnic groups in ex-Soviet Central Asia over the border to seek an independent state called East Turkestan.
Uighurs doubt their claims.
“The East Turkestan Islamic Movement qdoesn’t have a big influence on Uighurs,” said a 40-year-old imam who declined to be identified. “Most people have heard about this separatist movement, but most of them don’t know who they are or have seen their faces.”
Staring at a poster of two Uighurs shot by police last week on suspicion of involvement in the attacks in Kashgar, Kasim, the Uighur merchant, said: “They are not terrorists. They had their own problems. If they couldn’t solve them, then maybe they had no choice.”
And asked whether Xinjiang should be independent, he said: “I’m afraid to give you an answer. Walls have ears. But if you are smart, you’ll know what my answer is.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50