Before we start, let’s be clear: This is a great big hoot of a book. There are lines in it that will make you snort with laughter, situations so true to life that you will howl in recognition. It is very, very funny. So, you could read it just for that, for the entertainment value.
However, if you are female, and particularly if you are a female under 30, then, tucked around the jokes, Moran has provided you with a short, sharp, feminist manifesto. It’s not academic: She doesn’t present a research paper into gender differences in pay or interview women who have suffered domestic abuse. Instead, she uses her own life to examine the everyday niggles of everyday womanhood — hair removal, getting fat, tiny pants, expensive handbags — as well as the big stuff such as work, marriage and kids. She pins each topic out like a live, wriggling, sexist frog, ready for dissection. But, instead of cutting it into little bits, as, say, Germaine Greer would, Moran tickles it so hard that the frog has to beg for mercy and hop off.
Moran, a columnist for the London Times, writes very quickly, so How to Be a Woman is timely. (In fact, if you’re a regular reader of her columns, you’ll be familiar with some of the book’s topics — her wedding, the joy of bras, meeting Lady Gaga.) The book is also on point: Like the best columnists, much of what she says is something you’ve already thought of, but not articulated, not quite. And, like I say, it’s funny. Humor is, of course, the coolest, sharpest weapon in humanity’s social armory, and it’s one that feminists, supposedly, lack. (Though we might mention Tina Fey, Joan Rivers, Nora Ephron ...)
So, perhaps, the very fact that How to Be a Woman is so hilarious is its greatest strength. However, the parts of this book that I loved the most were actually the most serious. There are moments when Moran writes about her unconfident younger self that make you want to clutch that small person to you and say, “It will be all right.” And her account of giving birth and — particularly — of her abortion are exceptionally moving. Not because they are feminist. But because they are true.
The book’s structure loosely follows Moran’s life, from child to thirty-something, with the feminist analysis woven in between. If you wanted to be picky, there are a few occasions when this analysis doesn’t quite work. Her conclusion about pornography is pretty woolly.
There are times when her test for sexism — equating it with a lack of politeness — will not work. But, for this reader at least, that is made up for by her seven-page rant about the delight of pubic hair that includes this observation: “Lying on a hammock, gently finger-combing your Wookie whilst staring up at the sky is one of the great pleasures of adulthood.”
And Moran’s final, simple argument, that there should be more of us, more, different women taking up more space and having more power in the world, is spot on. Why should women only be allowed to be seen and, particularly, heard if they are deemed acceptable enough to do so? Acceptable meaning “pretty and of the right age.” You only need to go online, to read the blogs and tweets of the thousands of anonymous women out there to realize that we have as much to say, and can say it as cleverly and wittily, or as irritatingly and crassly, as men.
Moran has written for the Times since she was 17. She has won awards for her criticism and interviews. She is not an “ordinary” woman by any stretch of the imagination. However, the very nature of being female in the UK means that you share the same life architecture as most other women. Your life is structured in much the same way: To be blunt, you are sold the same shite. Brazilians, Botox, babies before you’re too old: Even if you know that you want none of these things, it can be hard not to be affected by an overbearing general atmosphere that tells you that you do. You must.
It can be hard not to be cowed.
The joy of this book is just that: the joy. What Moran is really arguing for is more female happiness. Women spend too much of their time worrying, beating themselves up, going along with time-wasting, restrictive, often expensive, sexist mores. The triumph of How to Be a Woman is that it adds to women’s confidence. It reminds us that sexism, and all that is associated with it, is not only repressive, it is tedious and stupid. It is boring. Best give it a body swerve and get on with having fun.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50