Making movies can be a long, grueling process, often taking months and sometimes years. Not so for participants in the 48 Hour Film Project, which takes place in Kaohsiung over the weekend of May 27 to May 29. Aspiring filmmakers and actors will convene to write, shoot, edit and score short films as part of the project, which is held in cities around the world on different weekends throughout the year.
Originating in Washington, DC in 2001, the 48 Hour Film Project claims to be the largest timed filmmaking contest in the world. According to its Web site (www.48hourfilm.com), nearly 40,000 participants in 80 cities on five continents made 3,000 films last year.
The Taiwanese edition of the contest is organized by Don Quan (關奕威), a Canadian living in Kaohsiung. He says that since Kaohsiung is the country’s first city to host the competition, the biggest challenge he and his two assistants face is how to answer the myriad questions from participants. “You don’t know what to expect … It is new to everybody,” said Quan, a filmmaker who has made one short film and two documentaries about independent music in Kaohsiung. So far, more than 35 teams from Kaohsiung, Tainan, Taichung, Taoyuan, Hsinchu and Taipei have signed up to compete.
Photo Courtesy of Don Quan
Each team is required to arrange its own crew, equipment, budget and anything else needed for filming. Competitors will then gather at the Film Production Center, Kaohsiung City Government Bureau of Cultural Affairs (高雄市政府文化局拍片支援中心) at 6pm on May 27, when they will select genres in a random drawing. But that is not all: Each movie must contain a line of dialogue, a character and a prop that are assigned by the organizer in the US and will not be announced until the starting time at 7pm.
The filmmakers must work all the elements into their four-to-seven-minute movies. They have to turn in the finished works to the center by 7:30pm on May 29, and only films that are submitted on time will be included in the official competition.
The jury panel — composed of film director Chen Wei-ting (陳威廷), curator Huang Hao-chieh (黃皓傑) and director and scholar Ting Chi-fang (丁祈方) — will give out awards at a ceremony scheduled to be held by the end of next month. Those who do not make the 48 hour deadline but still manage to complete their works need not despair. All the finished films will be screened at Oscar Cinema (奧斯卡影城) in Kaohsiung City on June 1 and June 2.
The “Best of Kaohsiung” winning team will receive a trophy and a cash prize of NT$2,000, and will go on to represent the city in the final for the international title of Best Film of the 2011 48 Hour Film Project and screenings at Cannes Film Festival next year.
Quan said that there are still places for additional teams. The entry fee is NT$3,750 per team. To register or for more information, visit www.48hourfilm.com/kaohsiung.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50