Sexual freedom, bizarre fashions, new media, an obsession with nudity, wild architectural excess: Some things never do change.
In lots of ways, the early 16th century sounds much like the early 21st. That’s one of the lessons of a new exhibition at the National Gallery in London, Jan Gossaert’s Renaissance.
This is a show with an intriguing theme: how the Italian Renaissance traveled to northern Europe. There are some splendid paintings on show as well as some strange and even hideous ones. Their oddness and occasional ugliness is part of the story.
Photo: Bloomberg
Gossaert (c. 1478 to 1532) was an artist who straddled the division between northern and southern art. In the 15th century, the painters of Flanders had invented something revolutionary — an absolutely naturalistic way of looking at the world around us. Gossaert inherited that.
He was best when painting something specific in front of him. There are terrific portraits on display, such as Anna van Bergen (c. 1526-30), or the Portrait of a Man (c. 1530), who is surrounded by the latest in Renaissance office equipment — paper. It was suddenly cheap enough to use freely.
The best things about Gossaert’s great altarpiece, the Adoration of the Kings (c. 1510-1515) are the heads, which actually look like real people. Among them is a noble black king, evidence that there was already an African presence in Europe.
Excellent too are the rich fabrics, preposterously trendy outfits and the ruined building in which the scene takes place. Ornate architecture was another Gossaert specialty. Also nice are the dogs: The one on the right is borrowed from a Durer engraving (prints being the 16th-century mode of image sharing).
It was different when Gossaert painted people with no clothes. This was a popular subject, then as now. Nudes were fashionable in Italy where popes and cardinals held bunga-bunga parties (and ordered murders like Mafia godfathers). Pictures of naked men and, particularly, women went down well with Gossaert’s patron, a lascivious Netherlandish nobleman who eventually became bishop of Utrecht (without altering his playboy habits).
For him, and others, Gossaert painted plenty of bodies, several of which are on show. Vasari, historian of the Renaissance, credited him with being “the first who took from Italy into Flanders the true method of making scenes full of nude figures.”
Among these are pictures of Adam and Eve, Venus and a drawing — for a lost painting — of a roomful of women in a bathhouse. (In 16th-century Flanders, these functioned much as some saunas do today). Gossaert’s naked people, though obviously intended to be sexy, are strange — bulky, bulbous, a bit gross.
Kenneth Clark, the art historian, once made a distinction between naked and nude. Naked is a person without clothes, a subject northern artists such as Jan van Eyck could do well. The nude is different. It’s a fiction — a combination of anatomy, geometry and ancient sculpture. No real person ever looked like a classical nude.
The Renaissance nude was an Italian invention. Even great northern artists struggled to get it right. Durer, Gossaert’s contemporary, had trouble — as several exhibits by him show. Michelangelo’s nude men look like supermen; Gossaert’s look as if they’ve spent too long in the gym. His women suffer from excess weight in unusual places. And his naked child angels, or putti, are pudgy toddlers with faces like Henry VIII’s.
Gossaert’s may be a more accurate view of undressed humanity.
Jan Gossaert’s Renaissance, supported by the Flemish government, is at the National Gallery, London, through May 30. The show previously was at the Metropolitan Museum, New York. On the Net: www.nationalgallery.org.uk.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50