The first thing to greet me on opening this book was the stink. Many modern full-color books printed on glossy paper share the same problem, but in the case of Ancient Worlds it was extreme. Maybe I’m especially sensitive to printing inks, but I hadn’t been reading this book long before my lips began to smart and the tip of my tongue to tingle. The partial solution was a sheet of transparent plastic draped over the book. Unfortunately, every time I came to turn over a page I had to lift the plastic and expose myself to the fumes (were they toxic?) once more.
Finally I managed to get some sort of a hold on the contents. Ancient Worlds, published as a companion volume to a recent TV series, is a survey of Middle Eastern and Mediterranean civilizations from the Sumerians to the later days of the Roman Empire. The author, Richard Miles, who on TV presumably could be seen walking over the ancient sites while expatiating on the manner of their demise, is both learned and possessed of the common touch, and so stands in a long line of British TV historian-presenters from AJP Taylor to Simon Schama. The result no doubt made excellent television, and it also makes for a very readable book.
By civilizations Miles means societies, almost invariably located in cities, that are based on cooperation in order to achieve long-term goals such as irrigation or the rule of law, enterprises that are beyond the capacity of families or small villages. He’s fond of saying things are “a triumph of hope over experience,” an expression that originated with Samuel Johnson who wittily used it to describe the behavior of a man who’d opted to get married for a second time. Miles finds it useful, though, because one of his big themes is that, though civilizations keep being destroyed, humans time and again try to create new ones.
That having been said, it’s also true that Miles is aware that referring to affluent societies as being “civilized” and poorer ones as being “primitive” is deemed politically incorrect. He defends the idea of civilization, nonetheless, as standing for the kind of development that mankind has constantly striven for and that created the world’s most magnificent artifacts.
He begins with the Sumerians who, just under 6,000 years ago, were the first people to move into cities. Uruk, in the south of today’s Iraq, was the world’s first city that we know of. We know a lot about it because the Sumerians also invented a form of writing, and city life, Miles surmises, isn’t really possible without this crucial technology.
At this point I began to wonder about the Chinese. The earliest we know of them for certain also comes from their first writings, inscribed on the so-called “oracle bones” at around 1,500 BC. But the reason Chinese civilization is so extraordinary is its continuity, not its age. Still going strong, it’s by far the world’s longest continuous civilization. But the honor of being the first goes, it seems, to the Sumerians.
We next learn that there are far more documents for Bronze Age Mesopotamia (the age of the Sumerians) than for classical Greece, that when the UK’s Stonehenge was probably completed (around 2,500 BC) 80 percent of Mesopotamians were already living in cities, that the demise of the Bronze Age cities was brought about by a group so mysterious they’re only referred to as “the Sea People,” and that when these cities and their writing disappeared so, for a time, does the historical record.
From these earliest cities Miles moves on to the Phoenicians (based in modern Lebanon) and the Mycenaean Greeks (Agamemnon, the Trojan warriors, etc.). The Phoenicians produced the first alphabet, greatly simplifying writing, a hugely popular purple dye, and two key aids to sailing — the keel and navigation by the Pole Star. Then came the murderous Assyrians (around 1,000 BC) with their mass deportations, mass decapitations, slavery and routine plunder.
As for the Greeks, Miles observes that there are 180 extant manuscripts of the Iliad (twice the number there are of the Odyssey) and that its true hero is the Trojan Hector, whereas the Greeks are “wolves at the gates ... troubled and troubling.” There’s a brilliant chapter on Alexander. We also learn that Greek statues had eyes inlaid with bone and glass, plus silver teeth and bronze lips and nipples; that bribery and race-fixing were common in the early Olympics; and that ancient Spartan men, brought up on compulsory homosexuality, had to be taught to copulate with women “by a series of marriage rituals that would keep a team of sex therapists in jobs for life.”
Miles enjoys giving his scholarly text a contemporary touch — things are one-offs or a real and present danger, and armies aim to shock and awe. He doesn’t go as far as Schama’s streetwise slang, but the aim (popular accessibility) is the same, and similarly successful.
The moral of this substantial book is that everything changes, and even conservatives can’t keep the same state of affairs in place for ever. Miles’ manner is congenial and at the same time induces trust, and the illustrations are impressive and sometimes magnificent, so if I see the TV series in DVD format I’ll certainly consider buying it. At least on a TV or computer screen I won’t be exposed to the noxious fumes. Nevertheless, books are books, so hopefully the paperback of this fine work will be as popular as it deserves to be, and will smell just a little more sweetly.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50