With graphic storylines, dramatic love scenes and gruesome portrayals of vampire life, Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight novels have become required reading for British teenagers. They were thanked for the 5 percent rise in children’s book sales recorded last year and are a popular feature of school libraries. But now researchers are investigating whether they are bad for teenagers’ brains.
At a conference at Cambridge University last month, neuroscientists and literary, education and media academics came together to investigate whether dark novels such as Twilight are affecting children’s brains in a worrying way. Maria Nikolajeva, professor of education at Cambridge, who organized the conference, says teens are particularly vulnerable to the power of literature because of their stage of development. “Neuroscience has shown that the adolescent brain is particularly unstable, since during this period we switch from focusing on ourselves towards understanding other people and becoming social beings,” she explains.
“All this chemistry makes teenagers confused — as we who have gone through it all know. There’s a risk that they might fail to recognize the conservative ideology of the Twilight series — like the horrendous gender stereotypes, and conservative family values.” Nikolajeva flags up the way leading lady Bella’s “only concern is to get a boyfriend and get married — as with all her female friends. And while [Bella’s vampire lover] Edward is handsome, strong and smart, she is feminine and silly,” she adds. “He makes decisions, she is submissive. Since the brain and mind of an adolescent is unstable, they have problems making decisions and judgments, and quite a vague sense of their own psychological, social and sexual identity. It is then easy to fall victim to something superficially glamorous, like Twilight.”
The inspiration for the conference — where talks included “What is it about good girls and vampires?” and “My life would suck without you” — came after Nikolajeva tried to interest a psychologist colleague in the role of adolescence in children’s literature. She was keen to widen the research into the effect of dark novels, but her colleague responded by saying: “And what might you know about it?” Nikolajeva recalls. “I felt it was high time we — psychologists, sociologists, historians, art educators and literary scholars — learned more from each other.” The 70-plus attendees came from 20 different countries and included teen-favorite author Meg Rosoff and American linguistic anthropologist Shirley Brice Heath.
But despite teens’ vulnerability to literature, the academics also concluded that Twilight could be an “excellent training field for understanding how other people think, feel and act,” says Nikolajeva. “Through literature, young people can test situations — including extreme situations — which they, in most cases, fortunately will not be exposed to in real life,” she adds. Meyer’s books can therefore act as a kind of brain-training for teens.
Many academics believe this issue will become increasingly important as young adult novels become all the gorier, as authors try to out-shock each other. Nikolajeva flags up The Hunger Games, the young adult sci-fi trilogy by Suzanne Collins, as “getting bigger than Twilight,” in part because it is “still darker and more violent and ethically dubious. It is as if writers compete about who can stretch the boundary further still.” But she hopes that authors heed the advice of How I Live Now author Rosoff, who at the conference spoke about how her own wild adolescence fed into her writing, and warned of adult writers’ responsibility when addressing young people, including the idea that “there must always be some hope left, even in the darkest fiction.”
The conference also outlined a major benefit of the Twilight series and books like them: Neuroscientists said that if certain skills, such as literacy, do not develop properly before adolescence, they may be lost forever. So parents might not want to lock away the books. “It’s good for young people to be exposed to narratives of all kinds,” Nikolajeva reports. “It would be best if they were exposed to narratives of highest artistic quality — which Twilight books are not — but through them they may discover other books.”
Nikolajeva adds: “If they read Romeo and Juliet and Wuthering Heights because the back covers say ‘Bella’s [Twilight protagonist Bella Swan] favorite book,’ then that’s great. Anecdotal evidence from the peak of Pottermania is that it made children come to the library to ask ‘have you got more books?’ Also, teenagers get confident through reading a novel of 500 pages, and by writing fan fiction or blogs, they also learn to write. That’s a welcome side-effect of Twilight.”
That’s borne out by evidence from librarians, like those of Bexleyheath school, a comprehensive in Kent, who write on its Web site: “Without doubt the most popular book in both libraries is Twilight, by Stephenie Meyer. This book has been in continuous demand by all year groups, including members of staff.”
And compared to the real world, a dose of escapism may not be such a bad thing, concludes Nikolajeva. “Young people today are well aware of the world around them, with ecological issues, poverty, terrorism, AIDS and so on,” she says. “There is no point telling them that the world is a nice place, and young adult fiction, unlike literature for younger children, has always dealt with serious and often dark issues.” So Twilight looks set to continue its bookshelf domination — at least until the next literary trend comes along.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
Peter Brighton was amazed when he found the giant jackfruit. He had been watching it grow on his farm in far north Queensland, and when it came time to pick it from the tree, it was so heavy it needed two people to do the job. “I was surprised when we cut it off and felt how heavy it was,” he says. “I grabbed it and my wife cut it — couldn’t do it by myself, it took two of us.” Weighing in at 45 kilograms, it is the heaviest jackfruit that Brighton has ever grown on his tropical fruit farm, located