The Red Shirt anti-government protesters have gone home, but Thailand’s tourism industry still is seeing red.
Armed soldiers, smoky streets and looted stores were the sad finale to two months of street protests seeking to force new elections. Those images have lingered in many minds, especially those of tourists, a couple of weeks since the protests ended.
Thailand now has the challenges of repairing its image and its tourism industry.
The number of visitors dropped significantly since the protests closed down Bangkok’s main shopping and tourist district in early April. Forecasts for this year were revised to 12 million visitors, down from 15 million, according to the Federation of Thai Tourism Associations.
The political standoff and the subsequent violent clashes caused losses of about US$1.9 billion to US$2.2 billion in tourism revenues, according to Atthachai Burakamkovit, permanent secretary of the Tourism and Sports Ministry. The government is talking with trade organizations to pinpoint the exact amount of the losses.
“Different trade associations have their own estimates to serve their own purposes,” said Atthachai.
Already, the government has earmarked US$154 million to help businesses related to tourism that are affected by
the turmoil and rioting. The package is awaiting the Cabinet’s approval.
“Using government funds to help private companies always is a difficult situation. And I don’t think anybody will hold their breath while this occurs,” said Bill Heinecke, chairman and CEO of Minor International, which operates 16 hotels in Thailand, including the luxury Four Seasons Hotel Bangkok.
The Four Seasons, on the front lines of the protests, was forced to close for seven weeks and expects to lose at least US$3 million as a result. Several other nearby upmarket hostelries also were shuttered.
“In my 40 years in the hotel industry, I haven’t seen anything this bad,” said Prakit Chinamornpong, president of the Thai Hotels Association.
The number of guest check-ins indicates a dire situation. Prakit said Bangkok’s occupancy rate for last month dipped to about 10 percent.
The hotel association wants the government to help loan repayments by fixing the interest rate at 3 percent for at least a year and to help workers.
During the turmoil, major travel agencies suspended tours to Bangkok, and that had a ripple effect on other destinations in Thailand. JTB Group, Japan’s largest travel agency, resumed ticket sales to Thailand only on May 27, after a month’s stoppage. Japanese made up the second-largest group of inbound tourists to Thailand last year, with almost 1 million visitors.
Prakit said the situation was worse than the 1997 financial crisis, the bird flu epidemic and even the occupation of Bangkok’s Suvarnabhumi international airport in 2008 by the People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD), the Red Shirts’ ideological rivals.
“It took us five months to recover from PAD’s nine-day airport closure. But this time it’ll be at least six months or even more,” said Prakit.
As a result of the airport closure, the total number of inbound visitors in 2009 fell to below pre-crisis projections. The 12 million arrivals forecast for this year would see Thailand return to pre-2006 figures.
Any previous efforts by the government to drum up confidence abroad since has been futile.
“It doesn’t matter how many times the prime minister went to Japan to boost the country’s image earlier this year, we’ve got to start all over again,” said Prakit.
Bangkok’s Montien Hotel saw its occupancy tumble from a February high of 80 percent to 3 percent as of last month, said resident manager Somsak Akaktanond. Last week only 10 of its 475 rooms were occupied, and they were regulars.
“There are no new customers. And many have canceled their bookings for the next couple of months,” said Somsak.
For the short term, hotels are now trying to attract
Asian tourists, believing that they are more understanding of the situation.
“Memory is very short-lived. We’ve seen events like the tsunami [which killed about 5,000 people in Thailand in 2004] and other incidents like the Bali bombing [in Indonesia] ... They pass very quickly,’’ said Heinecke.
The Thai tourism industry has managed to recover from crises in the recent past.
“The fundamentals of Thailand are still extremely strong,” said Heinecke. “I don’t think Thai people have changed. I don’t think Thai food has changed. And I don’t think the destination has changed.”
Some tourists are not fazed. French visitor Melanie Turleque, 33, was in Bangkok when the clashes took place.
“Everybody we talked to, Thai people, they’re saying it’s OK as long as you didn’t go into the area ... I’m not afraid,” she said.
She had also been to Koh Samui and Chiang Mai as part of her trip and found the two places to be “peaceful,” remote from problems.
“Thailand is such a friendly and beautiful place,” said Israeli Issac Cohen, 57, who came to take part in a futsal tournament. “I would suggest to all Thailand’s people to just smile like before.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50