Family sagas do not usually adapt well to the screen. With their profusion of characters and incidents, the two-hour plus format of the conventional feature film does not give them time to develop and they often seem like a race, with the director working frantically to cram in all the main elements. Thomas Mann’s novel Buddenbrooks, which was published in 1901 and contributed to his winning of the Nobel Prize for literature in 1929, covers the decline of a mercantile dynasty over four generations. Central themes include the emotional price paid by various family members to maintain the family’s prosperity, and the conflict between the disciplined life of commerce and the expressive life of art.
The complexities of the narrative are deftly handled by director Heinrich Breloer, whose experience directing a major German television docudrama on the Mann family, Die Manns — Ein Jahrhundertroman, has clearly helped in priming him to key elements of Mann’s ideas and style. Buddenbrooks certainly falls into the category of worthy film adaptations, and has a strongly literary quality, but as a cinematic experience it is sometimes rather flaccid. This is made up for by strong performances from an excellent ensemble cast, particularly Armin Mueller-Stahl as Johann Buddenbrook, a man whose life is totally dedicated to maintaining the position and wealth of the Buddenbrook family. Mueller-Stahl, one of a small number of German actors to have broken into the international mainstream (he was brilliant in David Cronenberg’s Eastern Promises and was on the cast of The West Wing, The International and Demons and Angels), exudes a palpable aura of menace from beneath an avuncular exterior, and is captivating to watch — when the family business is taken over by his son Christian (August Diehl), his presence is sorely missed by the audience.
August Diehl does a perfectly fine job in portraying Christian, a young man who sacrifices everything to continue the success of the Buddenbrook enterprise. Christian doesn’t possess his father’s steely assurance, and Diehl hasn’t quite got Mueller-Stahl’s charisma to fully flesh out this complex character who finds himself suffocated by a Faustian pact through which he becomes totally subsumed by the family business.
While Christian’s fate is imposed on him, his two siblings find themselves drifting on uncertain currents. Thomas (Mark Waschke) becomes a drunken man-about-town, totally dependent on his brother’s generosity, and Tony (Jessica Schwarz) makes a series of disastrous marriages that contribute to the family’s woes.
With the birth of Hanno, heir to the dwindling Buddenbrook fortune, the struggle between self-fulfillment and family responsibility reaches a new level, as the young man dedicates himself to music, and finds himself unable to take an interest in the hurly-burly of commercial life. That tragedy awaits is patently clear, and despite the fine settings and solid acting, by this time it really can’t come soon enough.
Hanno is never fully realized as a character, and this diminishes the human aspect of the family’s disintegration, and contributes to the feeling that the director is struggling to tie off the story as quickly as possible. Breloer manages to maintain a sense of structure, which has the virtues of discipline, but doesn’t have the space to truly immerse the audience in the Buddenbrook’s world.
Despite these shortcomings, Buddenbrooks is a perfectly adequate film, but like many such sagas, it would probably have been much better as a six or eight-hour made-for-television miniseries.
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
When the South Vietnamese capital of Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese forces 50 years ago this week, it prompted a mass exodus of some 2 million people — hundreds of thousands fleeing perilously on small boats across open water to escape the communist regime. Many ultimately settled in Southern California’s Orange County in an area now known as “Little Saigon,” not far from Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, where the first refugees were airlifted upon reaching the US. The diaspora now also has significant populations in Virginia, Texas and Washington state, as well as in countries including France and Australia.
On April 17, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) launched a bold campaign to revive and revitalize the KMT base by calling for an impromptu rally at the Taipei prosecutor’s offices to protest recent arrests of KMT recall campaigners over allegations of forgery and fraud involving signatures of dead voters. The protest had no time to apply for permits and was illegal, but that played into the sense of opposition grievance at alleged weaponization of the judiciary by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to “annihilate” the opposition parties. Blamed for faltering recall campaigns and faced with a KMT chair
Article 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文) stipulates that upon a vote of no confidence in the premier, the president can dissolve the legislature within 10 days. If the legislature is dissolved, a new legislative election must be held within 60 days, and the legislators’ terms will then be reckoned from that election. Two weeks ago Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) proposed that the legislature hold a vote of no confidence in the premier and dare the president to dissolve the legislature. The legislature is currently controlled