Eighty-one-year-old Thomas Selldorff, who fled Austria with his family before it was annexed by Nazi Germany in 1938, hopes an upcoming international conference will bolster efforts to return Nazi-looted art.
The Nazis seized more than 200 artworks owned by his grandfather, an avid art collector, as part of a policy of seizing Jewish property. So far, Selldorff has been able to retrieve only two of the lost paintings.
“I want to be able to pass these things on to my family ... I want them to have the link and an appreciation for some of the things my grandfather was involved with,” said Selldorff, who lives in the US and wants to exhibit the altar pieces by Austrian baroque artist Kremser Schmidt in a museum.
Some 65 years after World War II, experts say thousands of artworks confiscated by the Nazis, including masterpieces by art nouveau master Gustav Klimt and expressionist Egon Schiele, still need to be restituted to their rightful owners.
Government officials from around 49 countries, dozens of non-governmental groups and Jewish representatives will meet in Prague this week to review current practices. They are likely to sign a new agreement to step up restitution efforts.
Some participants hope the conference will lead to the creation of a central body responsible for publishing updates on countries’ progress, which could prompt them to do more.
The task of restituting Nazi-looted works is an epic one. The Nazis formed a bureaucracy devoted to looting and they plundered a total of 650,000 artworks and religious objects from Jews and other victims, the Jewish Claims Conference estimates.
Artworks were auctioned off, handed over to national museums or top Nazi officials, or stashed away for a Fuehrer museum Adolf Hitler was planning to build in the Austrian town of Linz, where he spent a part of his youth.
“This is one way that Jews were made to pay for their own elimination,” said art restitution expert Sophie Lillie.
At the end of World War II, some works were returned, but many continued to circulate on the international art market or stayed put in museums, and it was only in the 1990s that there was a new burst of Holocaust restitution.
PATCHY RECORD
Austria is considered one of the leaders of art restitution efforts, putting its larger neighbor Germany to shame. The Alpine republic passed a law in 1988 governing art restitution and has since returned more than 10,000 artworks.
“There are a handful of countries that have achieved a lot,” said Anne Webber, co-chair of the Commission for Looted Art in Europe, citing Austria, the Netherlands and the UK.
Austria’s Belvedere Gallery has had to restitute 10 paintings by Gustav Klimt, including two portraits of Adele Bloch-Bauer that are among the artist’s most famous works.
“Most countries have not even undertaken the work which was endorsed in Washington in 1998,” said Webber, referring to the non-binding Washington Principles agreed by 44 countries in 1998 as the framework for returning looted art.
Under the Washington Principles, countries agreed to identify stolen art, open up archives, publicize suspicious cases and “achieve a just and fair solution” for the Nazi-persecuted pre-war owners or their heirs.
Lawyers and experts say many countries have not enforced the principles and hope they will agree at the Prague conference on a transparent way to report on progress.
One of the main obstacles to art restitution is the difficulty in tracing the provenance and proving the ownership.
Gunnar Schnabel, a German lawyer and author of Nazi Looted Art, said museums often “hold back any information they might have” about the murky wartime past of some of their works.
The unique nature of the Nazi regime also makes it difficult to legally define whether art was looted or not.
“The Nazis were very inventive, and thought up lots of ways to expropriate someone of their belongings,” said Christoph Bazil, head of Austria’s art restitution committee.
For example, Jews were sometimes coerced into selling their art to Nazis and Nazi sympathizers, or forced to sell paintings to fund day-to-day living because they had been forced out of work or because they had to pay discriminatory taxes.
Some people argue that in cases where the original owners of the artworks received money for them, it was a legally valid transaction, while others say the discriminatory Nazi policies imposed on Jews mitigate that validity.
Even when claimants are successful in proving their ownership of an artwork, they have often been unable to retrieve it due to rigid export bans on cultural patrimony.
A Jewish American heiress won a court battle with Hungary in 2000 for the return of art looted by Nazis, including works by Cranach, Van Dyck and El Greco. But the outcome was a Pyrrhic victory, as the works were not allowed to leave the country.
BACKLASH
As art restitution speeds up and returned works of art fetch record sums at auctions and private sales, there are the beginnings of a backlash against the claimants who some say are tracking down their inheritance to sell it for profit.
One of the five Klimt artworks returned to the Bloch-Bauer family a few years ago was sold for US$135 million, believed to be the highest price ever paid for a painting.
Yet art restitution experts say most looted artworks are worth more sentimentally than financially and are in some cases the only remaining possessions of murdered relatives.
“The few examples of restituted paintings then sold at auctions are of course the ones that everyone talks about, but there are many that stay in the families,” said Monika Tatzkow, 54, historian and provenance researcher.
Some say it is time to close the chapter on looted art.
Norman Rosenthal, a former curator at London’s Royal Academy of Arts whose own family fled Nazism, has suggested that the issue of Nazi-looted art must now be confined to history, just as with other cases of looted art, during the Bolshevik Revolution, for example, or the Napoleonic Wars.
Supporters of art restitution, however, say Nazi-looted art is unique because it was part of the process of genocide, starting with the elimination of peoples’ professional existence and their possessions, and ending with their murder.
Expert Lillie argues museums that benefited from Jewish expropriation and then dragged their feet on art restitution for decades have a moral responsibility to address the issue.
“This is their last chance to try to atone for past wrongs.”
The unexpected collapse of the recall campaigns is being viewed through many lenses, most of them skewed and self-absorbed. The international media unsurprisingly focuses on what they perceive as the message that Taiwanese voters were sending in the failure of the mass recall, especially to China, the US and to friendly Western nations. This made some sense prior to early last month. One of the main arguments used by recall campaigners for recalling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers was that they were too pro-China, and by extension not to be trusted with defending the nation. Also by extension, that argument could be
Aug. 4 to Aug. 10 When Coca-Cola finally pushed its way into Taiwan’s market in 1968, it allegedly vowed to wipe out its major domestic rival Hey Song within five years. But Hey Song, which began as a manual operation in a family cow shed in 1925, had proven its resilience, surviving numerous setbacks — including the loss of autonomy and nearly all its assets due to the Japanese colonial government’s wartime economic policy. By the 1960s, Hey Song had risen to the top of Taiwan’s beverage industry. This success was driven not only by president Chang Wen-chi’s
Last week, on the heels of the recall election that turned out so badly for Taiwan, came the news that US President Donald Trump had blocked the transit of President William Lai (賴清德) through the US on his way to Latin America. A few days later the international media reported that in June a scheduled visit by Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) for high level meetings was canceled by the US after China’s President Xi Jinping (習近平) asked Trump to curb US engagement with Taiwan during a June phone call. The cancellation of Lai’s transit was a gaudy
The centuries-old fiery Chinese spirit baijiu (白酒), long associated with business dinners, is being reshaped to appeal to younger generations as its makers adapt to changing times. Mostly distilled from sorghum, the clear but pungent liquor contains as much as 60 percent alcohol. It’s the usual choice for toasts of gan bei (乾杯), the Chinese expression for bottoms up, and raucous drinking games. “If you like to drink spirits and you’ve never had baijiu, it’s kind of like eating noodles but you’ve never had spaghetti,” said Jim Boyce, a Canadian writer and wine expert who founded World Baijiu Day a decade
RSS