In his office at CBS-TV studios in Hollywood, Bill Maher is busy being Bill Maher. “You’ll never get rid of Christianity in this country because it will reinvent itself, as it always has. Every generation does a Superman movie, every generation does Hamlet, and they do it in a new and different way. Because that’s what a myth is: a living, breathing, mutating thing. So that central bit of, ‘There was a God, he had a son and he died for your sins’? I mean that’s just an entitlement program that no one wants to give up! Why would you? ‘Oh, he died for my sins? That’s fantastic — why, of course I love him! So I can keep sinning now, because he died for me!’”
Somewhere along the way, this half-Catholic, half-Jewish, wholly non-observant stand-up comedian has turned into one of the most visible, vocal atheists in America. He is a ruder, less intellectual, far more foul-mouthed and much funnier teammate of Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins. This week sees the release of Maher’s own atheist manifesto, the effervescent and provocative documentary feature film Religulous.
Directed by Larry Charles, the former Seinfeld writer who brought us Borat’s cinematic provocations, Religulous is atheism and rationalism washed down with a spoonful of acidic comedy. Maher has traveled the US and the Middle East confronting the craziest and sanest devout figures he can find, inserting himself into situations where religion and ridiculousness naturally and unabashedly band together.
Here he is at the Holy Land Experience in Orlando, Florida, debating with the handsome actor who plays Jesus in the themepark’s
re-enactments of the Passion, all beneath the local airport’s noisily anachro-
nistic flight path. Or in a converted lorry functioning as a church at a southern truck stop, berating increasingly angry blue-collar worshippers for their credulity. Here he is meeting Pastor John Westcott, an “ex-gay” preacher who insists that, “nobody’s born gay.” Elsewhere a cast of humourless halfwits, minatory prophets, ex-Jews-for-Jesus, homophobic closet queens, and, of course, doubters, are intercut with scenes from every overblown religious epic you have ever seen.
In Europe, one suspects, all this is less controversial than in the US, where just getting to see the movie could be difficult. “It simply wasn’t available in many areas,” says Maher. “I’ve likened it to getting an abortion. People complain all the time that if you want to get an abortion in America, often you have to drive 300 miles [483km] — same with Religulous.”
And yet a recent census found that the fastest-growing “religious minority” is non-believers. Not to mention that Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris have all topped the bestseller lists. “Yes. 1990: 7 percent of Americans had no religious affiliation; and then the most recent census reported a doubling of that number. But does it level off — or does it grow? And three writers — yes, the more voices we have, the better. But we’re looking for a tipping point and America’s still very far away from that. Before that happens, or doesn’t, rationalism needs to become something ‘cool.’ We need to tell people who believe in mythical space gods, ‘Dude, you are so old-school 20th century!’”
THE PATH TO REDEMPTION
Maher made the biggest splash of his career early in the 21st century, when he was fired by ABC-TV from his round-table show, Politically Incorrect With Bill Maher, for saying of the Sept. 11 hijackers, “We have been the cowards, lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles [3,218km] away. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building? Say what you like about it, it’s not cowardly.” As he often asks, “Why was I the only person to lose his job after Sept. 11?” Plenty sympathized with Maher, though, including the Home Box Office channel, which offered him a weekly show featuring guests of his own choosing. Real Time With Bill Maher has since become one of the essential stops for politicians making a name or running for national office, and its eclectic roster of guests offers a lively spectrum of political opinions that puts the cable-news gabfests to shame.
It has provided YouTube with endless instances of toothsome TV: regular guest Christopher Hitchens giving a hostile audience his rigid middle digit; clueless rightwingers subjected to deafening boos from Maher and fellow guests; or Maher himself wading furiously into the audience to eject an invading horde of Sept. 11 conspiracy-theorists. His panelists have included comics such as Roseanne Barr, Robin Williams and Sarah Silverman, novelists (Salman Rushdie), anti-globalization activists (Naomi Klein), political gadflies (Arianna Huffington), rappers (Mos Def, Will.I Am), and actors from Kevin Costner (dim) to Ben Affleck (sharp as a tack). The combinations can light a fire or fizzle like a damp squib — either way the show is unmissable.
Maher calls himself, broadly, a “libertarian” but veers mainly left, despite being pro-death penalty, staunch for Israel, and, by his own admission, pretty weird about what he eats. He’s also an unabashed pothead, a single bachelor with a wryly self-confessed weakness for strippers and models. A lack of ties to mainstream ideologies nonetheless enables him to call for a plague on both their houses with no sense that he is angling for that chimera of news coverage, “objectivity.”
Religulous offers no doubt about his stance on religion, though, and in person he’s fiercely articulate and well-versed in rationalist arguments. Fifty-three years old, he was raised in suburban New Jersey by a “proud, bleeding-heart, Irish-American Kennedy-era liberal father,” and a mother he didn’t learn was Jewish until he was 13. His father stopped the family attending Mass in protest against Catholic doctrine on birth control. Religion deserted Bill Maher long ago.
I put it to Maher that none of the religious right’s big guns are in the movie. “I’ve been talking about this on TV for so long that I come pre-advertised. So we didn’t get anywhere near Pat Robertson or the Pope. Those guys are so well-rehearsed in their bullshit that you get a more honest picture if you just talk to the rank-and-file. The Jesus guy at the Holy Land Experience was a much more interesting character than Pat Robertson would be.”
BEYOND SALVATION
Did he get a sense that his subjects wished to cast him in the Lake of Fire? “They’d prefer to save me, pray for me. It would have been preferable to have their hostility, because I found their reaction very condescending, like I was a backward child. In their mind if you don’t see Jesus Christ as your savior, then you are profoundly unenlightened. So we are, in a way, mirror-images of each other, because I see them as unenlightened, as being in thrall to a bronze-age myth.”
The two perspectives seem irreconcilable. “The problem with us rational people is that we tend not to gather in groups, like religious people. Religious people gather in groups because when you’re being told something really fantastical like, ‘God had a son, who was really him, and he sent him on a suicide mission, and he survived, and you’re eating his flesh when you’re eating this bread that was obviously bought at a store’ ... If you’re gonna swallow all that you need someone standing next to you swallowing it too. If religion does anything it preys on the sheeplike qualities of human beings. And atheists and agnostics aren’t joiners, because we celebrate our individualism and our ability to freely think on our own.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50