The last of the Yugoslav-era cars, known for their lack of reliability as much as tasteless design and crude unworkmanlike finish, rolled off the assembly line in Serbia on Friday, nearly two decades after Yugoslavia itself fell apart.
Zastava, the car factory in the central Serbian town Kragujevac, has effectively ceased to exist and, following a massive investment by the Italian giant Fiat, is to begin making a modern small car.
Launched in 1953 in a country recovering from a destructive war while trying to implement its own form of socialism, Zastava was to prove that Yugoslavia could build a car of its own.
Some 4.3 million cars have rolled out of Kragujevac since, but only a few different models, including the Zastava 750, then the 128, and the prestigious 1300 (all based on Fiat models) and the independently made Zastava 101, the Yugo and the relatively spacious Zastava Florida.
The last Zastava car to roll off the assembly line was a 101 model, which had been in production with only slight cosmetic changes since 1971. The Yugo — the most-produced and best-known — went of out production a day before the 101 did.
The Yugo was a boxy two-door hatchback made from a design that was hopelessly outdated even when it was presented three decades ago. The Zastava 101 at least had four doors, but otherwise was largely the same car. Any Zastava engine tended to lose compression after just a few thousand kilometers and its gearbox would generally lose the third gear shortly afterward.
Zastava seats were sometimes fitted in at strange angles, the doors tended not to align with the body and could generally be unlocked with any key. The paint would go quickly in the sun, the rear windshield wiper machine would inevitably burn out.
These problems, in combination with the “Yugoslav deal of the century” in the 1980s, in which several hundred thousand of cars where shipped to the US, secured the Yugo lasting fame — or infamy, depending on one’s point of view.
Unlike many other cars of similarly poor quality made around the globe, the Yugo was briefly exposed to what the average Serb called the “spoiled” market in the US. Without that exposure, the car would never have become a regular in polls for the “worst cars in history,” “worst car ever” and “worst car of the millennium.” Nor would it have made it to become the star of so many jokes, such as: Why does a Yugo have rear window heaters? So your palms don’t freeze when you’re pushing it.
The Yugo made it to Hollywood, too, starring with Tom Hanks and Dan Aykroyd in Dragnet, with Bruce Willis in Die Hard 3 and in Danny DeVito and Bette Midler’s Drowning Mona, in which everybody in the fictional town drove one.
But in Yugoslavia, later Serbia, the Yugo and the other Zastava models were the “people’s car” — cheap, repairable at every street corner and as tradable as cash.
“These cars were fantastic — cheap and simple. Low maintenance costs, anyone could fix it and the parts were cheap,” said Milojka Minic, a worker in the Zastava factory.
“I’ll keep it until I die,” says Krsta Vukovic, a Belgrade pensioner who spends a part of virtually every dry day to tool around his 1989 — once carmine red, now faded pink — Model 101.
So despite the cars obvious shortcomings, many in Serbia will miss Zastava. To the consolation of those feeling nostalgic, the end was long overdue and would have come much sooner without massive subsidies.
After all, the production had dropped from more than 200,000 units at the peak of the deal with the US, to just a few thousand that was the benchmark for much of the past 15 years.
Now, with Fiat taking over, after many years in the doldrums, the town of Kragujevac may hope to regain at least some of the shine it had as the “industrial pearl” of Serbia.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50