Joseph Needham is one of those extraordinary characters whose life was so large and sprawling that it needs first to be condensed into a list. He was a scientist, polyglot, traveler, diplomat, Christian, socialist, exponent of free love, nudist, morris dancer and Sinophile. All these aspects of Needham’s life are explored in Simon Winchester’s Bomb, Book and Compass, but it is Sinophilia that animates every page. The title refers to Francis Bacon’s choice of the three inventions (all Chinese) that changed the world. However, the American title — The Man Who Loved China — better describes the thrust of the book.
To a certain school of Western thought, China has long been a kind of intellectual Shangri-la, although rather than immortality the gift of this Oriental utopia is invention: it’s the place where every idea was born. It’s a tradition that trails a sometimes dubious reputation, including as it does figures such as Gavin Menzies, the author of popular history books that claim the Chinese discovered the New World and inspired the European Renaissance. Such arguments, according to one academic, are “the historical equivalent of stories about Elvis Presley in [a supermarket].”
Needham also tended to see Chinese footprints in every aspect of modernity, but he is not so easily dismissed. His academic credentials were dauntingly impressive. A brilliant Cambridge biochemist, he remains one of the very few people to have been a fellow of both the Royal Society and the British Academy, and before he died the only living person to hold, in addition to these titles, that of Companion of Honour. As one of the founding officials, he was also the man who literally put the letter “S” for science into Unesco.
The editor and co-author of Science and Civilisation in China, a massive, multi-volume study, he spent more than half a century collecting and compiling evidence that China was the birthplace of everything from chess to cartography, from the stirrup to the suspension bridge. In the process, he probably did more than any other individual to shift the balance of scientific history towards the East.
Needham fell in love with China by first falling in love with a Chinese woman, a research assistant named Lu Gwei-djen (魯桂珍) who came to Cambridge in 1936. Though he was married, the relationship was apparently “open” and for the next 52 years Lu would be his mistress. The couple eventually married in 1989. With the help of Lu, the biochemist taught himself Chinese (Nanjing Mandarin) and in 1943 was flown into war-torn China by the British government on a diplomatic mission to help embattled Chinese scientists and academics. It was a dangerous assignment and one filled with will-sapping logistical difficulties, yet Needham maintained an unflappable optimism that was nothing less than heroic.
The finest sections of Winchester’s book describe the excursions Needham made to the further reaches of China, ostensibly goodwill trips, but really as a way of gathering data for the book that would become Science and Civilisation in China. Here we see Needham at his most intrepid and eccentric, a sort of Waugh character by way of Indiana Jones. China in the war years bore little resemblance to the economic powerhouse of today. Its industry was all but destroyed, roads were ancient (or non-existent) and poverty was widespread. How the once mighty Chinese empire had come to fall so low is, in essence, the basis of what became known as the “Needham question.”
Needham wanted to know why Chinese scientific innovation had ground to a halt in the 16th century, just when European science was taking off. As Winchester says, the Cambridge don “never fully worked out the answers.” Nevertheless, he was convinced that the solution to China’s problems was communism. He befriended Zhou Enlai (周恩來), number two to Mao Zedong (毛澤東), and managed, like many other intellectuals, to excuse or ignore the brutality and totalitarianism of communist rule.
In this field, he had form. He visited Moscow in 1935 and returned “powerfully reinforced” by the experience. This willingness to believe the best of the worst would almost destroy his professional standing. In 1952, Needham joined an international commission set up by the Chinese government to investigate reports that the Americans had used biological weapons in the Korean War. Led by the nose by Chinese agents, who mocked up sites and faked results, Needham declared the US guilty as charged.
In this conclusion, he was almost certainly wrong. As Winchester writes: “Needham was intellectually in love with communism and yet communist spymasters and agents, it turned out, had pitilessly duped him.” For a while, it looked as if he might lose his position at Cambridge. But the controversy passed and he went on to be elected master of Gonville and Caius College.
Needham was sympathetic to the student rebellions of 1968. During one sit-in, he sent a note to protesters: “I wish you to know that I support entirely all the reforms for which you are demonstrating today.” And in spite of his long-standing defense of Chinese academics, he was also an advocate of Mao’s Cultural Revolution, which terrorized academia.
All the same, by the time of his death in 1995, Needham’s ideological beliefs were comprehensively overshadowed by his intellectual achievements. Chief of these are the Needham Research Institute in Cambridge and the enormous, perspective-altering endeavor that is Science and Civilisation in China. Such testaments speak for themselves, but what’s left to say is said with great verve and style by Winchester in this biography.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless