When a family sedan that can barely reach 120km per hour gets more attention than the unveiling of a US$1.4 million Lamborghini, you know something major is happening in the auto world.
That was the scene Friday at the Los Angeles Auto show, where thousands flocked to see new hydrogen fuel-cell models from carmakers Honda and General Motors with more enthusiasm than the extraterrestrial Italian supercar the Lamborghini Reventon.
"The Los Angeles show illustrates how automakers, in general, now value miles per gallon as much as miles per hour," said Rick Popely, an auto writer from Chicago.
PHOTO: AFP
Headlining the LA show were announcements from Honda and General Motors as each unveiled plans to market the first hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles early next year. But don't look for them in your local showroom just yet.
Honda said it will begin leasing its new FCX Clarity, powered by a hydrogen fuel cell, to drivers in summer 2008 in southern California.
Honda would not say how many vehicles will be available in the limited lease program. The company plans to offer a three-year lease with a US$600 monthly payment on the sleek, aerodynamic FCX Clarity sedan. Using a fuel cell that combines hydrogen with oxygen to produce electricity from the chemical reaction, the vehicle will have fuel economy of 30km per liter, and the only emissions will be water dripping from the tail pipe.
PHOTO: AFP
US automaker General Motors said it will put 100 fuel-cell vehicles on the road starting next year in California, New York and the city of Washington, including 10 that will transport visitors at Disneyland.
The fuel-cell powered Chevrolet Equinox, a compact sport-utility vehicle (SUV), is the first in a line of hydrogen vehicles that GM says it expects to see in showrooms by 2012, when it plans to start producing 1 million hydrogen vehicles a year.
GM unveiled a hybrid version of its heavy-duty Silverado pickup truck and earned a Green Car of the Year Award for its Chevy Tahoe hybrid, which boasts a two-mode gasoline-electric engine developed with BMW, Mercedes and Chrysler that improves the massive vehicle's fuel economy by 50 percent from conventional models.
Chrysler unveiled its own large hybrids, a Dodge Durango and a Chrysler Aspen. Ford unveiled hybrid plans, as did Porsche, Volkswagen and Audi.
The excitement belied the so-far niche interest of buyers in hybrid vehicles, which currently account for just 2 percent of car sales in the US. But a ruling this week by a federal appellate court in California required the Bush administration to significantly tighten fuel-economy standards.
The court's order overruled previous regulations that failed to thoroughly assess the economic impact of tailpipe emissions that contribute to climate change.
The ruling came in response to an appeal by four environmental groups and 13 states led by California against loopholes in the federal government's fuel-economy requirements for automakers. California is suing the federal government to get permission to enforce its own fuel-economy standards.
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger described the ruling as "another win for the environment and for consumers."
"Clearly, automobile companies have the capability to produce environmentally friendly cars," he said. "Today's court ruling underscores the need for the federal government to step in and provide the extra push necessary to make these vehicles widespread."
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
The older you get, and the more obsessed with your health, the more it feels as if life comes down to numbers: how many more years you can expect; your lean body mass; your percentage of visceral fat; how dense your bones are; how many kilos you can squat; how long you can deadhang; how often you still do it; your levels of LDL and HDL cholesterol; your resting heart rate; your overnight blood oxygen level; how quickly you can run; how many steps you do in a day; how many hours you sleep; how fast you are shrinking; how
“‘Medicine and civilization’ were two of the main themes that the Japanese colonial government repeatedly used to persuade Taiwanese to accept colonization,” wrote academic Liu Shi-yung (劉士永) in a chapter on public health under the Japanese. The new government led by Goto Shimpei viewed Taiwan and the Taiwanese as unsanitary, sources of infection and disease, in need of a civilized hand. Taiwan’s location in the tropics was emphasized, making it an exotic site distant from Japan, requiring the introduction of modern ideas of governance and disease control. The Japanese made great progress in battling disease. Malaria was reduced. Dengue was
RSS