The huddled masses in Max Barry's hilarious new novel, Company, can be found crammed inside the Seattle corporate headquarters of Zephyr Holdings. What does Zephyr Holdings hold? Nothing. What is its office building like? "It is a building designed by committee," Barry explains. "All they have been able to agree on is that it should be rectangular, have windows, and not fall over."
On Page seven of his latest fever dream about big business (after the wild fabulist escapades of Syrup and Jennifer Government), Barry underscores his credentials as both satirist and saboteur. He presents a one-paragraph mission statement that is a marvel. He has put real words ("consolidate," "profitable," "strategic") on the page. You can see them. But they have been perfectly arranged to flummox the brain. The paragraph is a perfect specimen of corporate-speak: impressive to gaze upon, totally impossible to read.
In a book dedicated to Hewlett-Packard, which once made the silly, silly mistake of employing Barry, the secrets and lies of corporate culture are explored with sharp, absurdist precision. Joseph Heller did it better, but not by much. Barry, an Australian writer with a mad gleam and a college education in marketing, invents a rats' nest of warring departments and scheming, back-biting employees, all manipulated by a senior management staff of exceptional ruthlessness.
"If senior management was ever made up of selfless individuals who put teamwork ahead of self-interest -- and this is a big if," Barry writes, "they were long ago torn to pieces."
Into this fray comes handsome, idealistic Stephen Jones, a newcomer of such clonelike perfection that some Zephyr cynics wonder whether he has a navel. This much is certain: Jones has a mouth, and it asks too many questions. For instance, Jones wonders why his salary has been hidden within the budget for office expenses ("I'm copy paper?") just because he arrived in the midst of a hiring freeze. And he begins to wonder why Zephyr, though a hive of activity, seems to have no real customers and no real work to do.
A third of the way into Company, Barry unveils a surprise: this satirical novel also has an element of science fiction. It mustn't be spoiled here. But the place is alive with trickery and its employees' already borderline personalities are at risk. As the book says of one Zephyr worker: "If Elizabeth's brain was a person, it would have scars, tattoos, and be missing one eye. If you saw it coming, you would cross the street."
Gathering his readers around a figurative campfire, Barry explains what work used to be like. "There are stories -- legends, really -- of the `steady job,'" he writes. "Old-timers gather graduates around the flickering light of a computer monitor and tell stories of how the company used to be, back when a job was for life, not just for the business cycle." But in the book's funhouse-mirror world, flexibility is the new ideal. "Flexible jobs allow employees to share in the company's ups and downs; well, not so much the ups," Barry writes. Desperate Zephyr workers do their best to keep up with the parsimonious atmosphere. "Every day we identify new ways to lower expenses," a colleague explains to Jones. "Just yesterday, we boarded up our office windows."
Company is Barry's breakout book. It's also his most conventional. In Syrup he took on the Coca-Cola Co (nothing else he writes is quite as sidesplitting as his disclaimers of malicious intent) and made wicked fun of hot young marketing types, the ones who favor quirky names. He himself test-drove the name Maxx Barry, though nobody got the joke. Jennifer Government was also convolutedly clever, but it worked hard to achieve its anarchic spirit.
In Company the characters are more breezily conceived. This is not to say that the author's world has lost its warped mystique, just that he has made it more -- yes -- marketable.
Being John Malkovich is one of his favorite films, and its influence is felt when Company, both psychically and literally, lands in the limbo between elevator floors.
Barry has sometimes been compared to Chuck Palahniuk for his rebellious bravado, but he has much more in common with Charlie Kaufman, the screenwriter with such an easy affinity for the Orwellian surreal.
Company eventually faces the problem inherent to paranoid fantasy: once the secrets are revealed, what happens next? Barry is far better equipped to zap Zephyr than to make it a more positive, productive, life-affirming place. He perfectly understands the company's problems. ("If Senior Management captained a ship, it would take twice as long to reach its destination and have been completely rebuilt en route.") But he is less astute about Zephyr's merits, possibly because there aren't any.
The closest he comes to humanizing Zephyr is to make Jones fall reflexively for Barry's favorite type of female character, this time named Eve: a cool, selfish, elusive beauty. "She shouldn't be here," a co-worker confides to Jones. "Her ideal job would be giving lethal injections in San Quentin."
Occasionally, Company is flimsy: its central conceit, about a stolen doughnut that occasions much pouting and sniping (and is seen on the book's cover), isn't worth the attention it's given. And some of the corporate types at Zephyr are slightly generic. But Barry is a deft and focused satirist, and his sense of business ethics is right on the money. "I just want to know that we treat our employees properly," Jones insists. "That we, you know, care about them."
"Honestly?" he is told by one of the real powers at Zephyr. "We don't."
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50