Paul Clark's efficient and intelligent survey titled Reinventing China looks at the films and careers of China's group of film directors who came to fame in the late 1980s and 1990s.
The fame was sometimes relative, but the most celebrated of them -- Zhang Yimou (
Clark, who is a Professor of Chinese at the University of Auckland, claims he got the idea for this new book while standing waist-deep at the quieter end of Hawaii's Waikiki Beach alongside Zhang and Chen -- enviable access to your celebrated subject-matter, you might think. But Clark is something of an authority on this subject and is the author of the much more extensive survey Chinese Cinema: Culture and Politics Since 1949.
That book was published by Cambridge University Press in 1987 and it's a fair guess that Clark offered this new book, in many ways an up-dating of the older one, to the same publisher.
That it has ended up appearing under the imprint of the far smaller Chinese University Press in Hong Kong should not necessarily be seen as saying something about its relative quality. Publishers' criteria for taking on books change by the day and the Hong Kong outfit has done a good job in terms of presentation and paper quality.
Not only Zhang and Chen but all the eight other filmmakers featured in this book enrolled in the Beijing Film Academy in the same year, 1978, and graduated four years later. The academy was, at the time, China's only film school. The book, then, is in the way of being what Clark calls a "collective biography" of a generation. Mao Zedong had died in September 1976, and his widow and her associates had been arrested the following month. China was thus clearly set for change, and the halt to that change that was to come in Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989, was still some way off. That a new kind of film was to emerge was virtually inevitable.
What was new about the films produced by this generation was that, for the first time in 40 years, they were not the products of a hard-line ideology. On the other hand, Clark makes the point that the students of this era had not had an unenviable upbringing. Their childhoods had taken place in the 1950s and early 1960s, what Clark calls "generally happy times," largely optimistic though inevitably politically-charged. These were the heady days of revolution, comparable to those early on in the revolutions in France and Russia, when all things seemed possible and the future a promised land.
All that disappeared in 1966 with the onset of the Cultural Revolution, followed in 1968 by the initiation of the scheme that was to influence a whole generation, the sending down to the countryside of 17 million of the nation's often relatively privileged urban youth.
Most of the filmmakers featured in this book were in their early teens in 1968. Not all their families were of equal revolutionary standing, however. Zhang's father had been an officer in Chiang Kai-shek's (蔣介石) Nationalist army prior to 1949 and earned a living doing odd jobs.
His status was further reduced by the fact that his eldest brother had fled to Taiwan in 1948. Zhang's mother was a professional dermatologist, but both parents were sent to the mountainous interior in the late 1960s -- a result of perceived anti-revolutionary crimes, and Zhang himself was labeled the "son of a dog" by Red Guards.
Chen's case was slightly different. His parents had both been involved in the film industry, but this didn't necessarily afford any protection. Chen, for example, had to attend mass criticism meetings denouncing his father and other leading members of the Beijing Film Studio. Clark sees this experience as lying behind the intense father-son relationships in many of the son's subsequent films.
The other filmmakers are less well-known, though enthusiasts will be familiar with several of them, especially Tian Zhuangzhuang, director of Horse Thief (1986) and The Blue Kite (1992), Wu Ziniu, director of Evening Bell (1988) and The Nanjing Massacre (1995), and Zhang Jianya, director of Ice River (1986) and Crash Landing (1999).
Taiwan appears here and there, notably in relation to two of Zhang's films. One of these, Codename Cougar (1989), featured the hi-jacking of a flight between Taipei and Seoul with the plane having to land in China and secret negotiations taking place between Taipei and Beijing. And the better-known Raise the Red Lantern of 1992 was a co-production with Taiwan -- its executive producer was the Taiwanese film director Hou Hsiao-hsien (
Reinventing China is a useful and meticulous book that has three major virtues. First, it offers an over-view of a crucial era of Chinese filmmaking, linking the social background, the filming activities and the personal biographies of the directors.
Second, it contains intelligent critiques of the films discussed, essentially all the important films of the time plus many others.
Lastly, it has the great advantage of personal contact with the 10 directors. All of them talked at length to Clark, not only about their adolescent experiences as re-located city youth, but also about the films they made as adults, what they intended to portray and occasionally how far they think they achieved their aims.
This is therefore both a handbook to consult before seeing the films of that era, and a work to read entire to put the individual films in their historical context. It may not represent a strikingly original approach, but it is cogent, intelligent and very well informed, and as such is definitely recommended.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50