Among the many colorful decorations on display at the 2004 Keelung Ghost Festival, a massive paper sculpture created by paper artist Wei Chun-pang (
Given the intricacy and splendor of the sculpture, most people would never guess that it was made of paper. In fact, according to Wei, the ancient Chinese divided religious sculptures into four descending categories: paper, terracotta, wood and porcelain. Depite being ranked first, paper sculptures are now a rarity.
PHOTO: YANG PEI-HWA, TAIPEI TIMES
According to Wei, the rarity of paper sculptures is because of the complex and highly labor intensive nature of the process, which is reflected in their high cost.
By the Qing Dynasty (1644 to 1911), paper sculptures were already becoming a rarity, Wei said. There are now very few practitioners of this art in Taiwan and in China, the art form has almost completely died out due to the suppression of religion.
Paper sculptures originated in the Tang Dynasty (AD 618 to AD 960) in China and the technology required to create paper sculptures has been handed down through the centuries.
Very simply, the sculpture is based on a rough model made from stiff paper board. This is then covered with up to 20 layers of tissue-thin cotton paper, applied three layers at a time. A varnish is then applied, after which the detail is carved.
There follows the process of outlining, inlaying gold, painting and finishing. Wei said that the process is extremely arduous, and it would be possible to create a five or six wood sculpture of the same size and intricacy in the same time it would take to make one of paper.
The important difference is that the paper sculpture is more resistant to pests such as termites and can last much longer than wood -- up to 600 years according to Wei. Because of the enormous cost, there is not much market demand for paper sculptures any more.
The nine-tailed dragon created for the 2004 Keelung Ghost Festival is a remarkable testament to the subtle expression that this art form is capable of.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Sept.16 to Sept. 22 The “anti-communist train” with then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) face plastered on the engine puffed along the “sugar railway” (糖業鐵路) in May 1955, drawing enthusiastic crowds at 103 stops covering nearly 1,200km. An estimated 1.58 million spectators were treated to propaganda films, plays and received free sugar products. By this time, the state-run Taiwan Sugar Corporation (台糖, Taisugar) had managed to connect the previously separate east-west lines established by Japanese-era sugar factories, allowing the anti-communist train to travel easily from Taichung to Pingtung’s Donggang Township (東港). Last Sunday’s feature (Taiwan in Time: The sugar express) covered the inauguration of the
The corruption cases surrounding former Taipei Mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) head Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) are just one item in the endless cycle of noise and fuss obscuring Taiwan’s deep and urgent structural and social problems. Even the case itself, as James Baron observed in an excellent piece at the Diplomat last week, is only one manifestation of the greater problem of deep-rooted corruption in land development. Last week the government announced a program to permit 25,000 foreign university students, primarily from the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia, to work in Taiwan after graduation for 2-4 years. That number is a
This year’s Michelin Gourmand Bib sported 16 new entries in the 126-strong Taiwan directory. The fight for the best braised pork rice and the crispiest scallion pancake painstakingly continued, but what stood out in the lineup this year? Pang Taqueria (胖塔可利亞); Taiwan’s first Michelin-recommended Mexican restaurant. Chef Charles Chen (陳治宇) is a self-confessed Americophile, earning his chef whites at a fine-dining Latin-American fusion restaurant. But what makes this Xinyi (信義) spot stand head and shoulders above Taipei’s existing Mexican offerings? The authenticity. The produce. The care. AUTHENTIC EATS In my time on the island, I have caved too many times to
Many Taiwanese have a favorable opinion of Japan, in part because Taiwan’s former colonial master is seen as having contributed a great deal to the development of local industries, transportation networks and institutions of education. Of course, the island’s people were never asked if they wanted to be ruled by Tokyo or participate in its modernization plans. From their arrival in 1895 until at least 1902, the Japanese faced widespread and violent antagonism. Things then calmed down, relatively speaking. Even so, between 1907 and 1916 there were eleven anti-Japanese revolts. A map in the National Museum of Taiwan History (國立臺灣歷史博物館)