Fifty years after it spilled a lethal mix of mud, ash and water which washed away a bridge and derailed a train, killing 151 people, Mount Ruapehu, at 2,797 metres the highest peak in New Zealand's North Island, is threatening to do it again.
As the nation remembers the tragedy of Christmas Eve 1953 when Ruapehu, an active volcano, created one of the country's worst ever natural disasters, controversy has broken out about how to prevent the loss of lives next time and minimize the damage.
Mount Ruapehu contains a steaming 17-hectare lake in a crater near the summit which burst through the ice wall rim on Dec. 24, 1953 sending a lahar (a silt and rock-laden mudflow) down the mountainside and sweeping away the Tangiwai rail bridge minutes before the Wellington to Auckland night express roared through.
PHOTO: DPA
The engine and first five carriages were picked up by the unstoppable tide of swirling mud and rock and carried four kilometres down the Whangaehu River, killing 151 of the 285 people aboard and indelibly etching Tangiwai (Maori for "weeping waters") into the national consciousness.
It was the most devastating of the 60 or so lahars that have swept down the slopes of Ruapehu over the last 150 years.
It had not been predicted, though it followed a series of eruptions eight years earlier which emptied the crater lake and dammed its outlet with rocks and glacial ice allowing it to refill to a much greater depth than before.
In 1995, the mountain erupted again, emptying out the crater lake once more. It left a dam about 7m thick over its former outlet, but this time there is no ice content and geologists say the wall is weak.
The lake is refilling and barring another eruption, the boiling hot water is expected to reach the top of the dam within the next two years.
Another runaway lahar would damage the new road and rail bridges at Tangiwai and block State Highway 1 between the capital Wellington and the country's biggest city and commercial center Auckland.
Some want the government to construct a channel to allow the lake to be safely drained into the Whangaehu River and out to sea before it breaks through the top of the rim and creates a lahar.
But instead, the government has chosen an early warning system that is designed to give 90 minutes' notice of a lahar heading toward the bridges and an hour to stop traffic entering the part of the highway that would lie in its path.
It is also building a bund, or stopbank, to divert the lahar from the ecologically sensitive Tongariro River, a popular trout fisherman's waterway.
There are other issues. Ruapehu is one of several volcanoes in the central North Island, all revered by local Maori tribes for their spiritual and cultural links with ancestors and gods.
They oppose any artificial alteration of the mountain as an insult to their ancestors.
In addition, the volcanoes are all in the Tongariro National Park, one of only a score or so sites in the world with dual World Heritage status in recognition of outstanding natural and cultural values.
The government fears interfering with Ruapehu's crater lake could compromise that status.
Former Minister of Conservation Nick Smith says the government's sensitivity over Maori spiritual values and its aversion to doing earthworks in the National Park have led to the rejection of a "commonsense solution" to excavate the dam.
"The warning system and bund are an expensive and poor solution that attempts to control the deadly lahar rather than prevent it. They are playing Russian roulette with people's lives in the name of political correctness," he says.
But his successor Chris Carter defends the measures in place and the decision not to put a bulldozer up the mountain to undertake earthworks.
"You can never predict what the outcome of playing on the mountain would be," he said, claiming really comprehensive measures had been taken to provide a long-term solution to the problem.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50