The closing instalment of the Museum of Contemporary Art's (台北當代藝術館) TAT: Taiwanese Artists Today (搞破壞台灣藝術家個展) series presents a double exhibition from two 1970s artists, who often take a more playful attitude to artistic creation than their predecessors.
Adrift, (
Wang's No. 50 is a continuation of her series of large plastic airbags made specifically to fill gallery spaces. The whole east wing of the museum is taken up by one white translucent airbag. Visitors may crawl into its crack or wade through it to experience the volume of air inside. The work, Wang said in an introduction to the show, means to provoke viewers to return to the primal state of human interaction with the world, in which they heavily rely on their senses to explore their surroundings.
PHOTO COURTESY OF MUSEUM OFCONTEMPORARY ART
The way to understanding the work lies not in the head, but in our intrinsic sensory perceptions, she said. "I've made a work which is what you see and what you touch. That's it," Wang said.
By stripping her works of any external references or compli-cated messages about society at large, Wang effectively provokes thought on an often neglected subject, with a simple yet beautiful work.
The title EX-TT-03 means nothing to Huang Shih-chie except as a file number. With no set plans in mind, Huang sets out to create his kinetic installations from piecing together several electronic gadgets. He sees himself as a mad scientist in his laboratory.
PHOTO COURTESY OF MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART
On flights of fancy, he attaches circuits, tubes, lightbulbs, radios and whatever he happens to have on hand, to the rudimentary assemblage of chips and plastic. The results appear to be like robots, but they are products of impromptu experiments and accidents that Huang describes as otherworldly synthetic life forms, whose sensors enable them to interact with viewers as well as each other.
The New York-based artist visits his homeland once a year and this time he brought with him a big trunk full of random objects in order to create these robotic creatures for the show.
The bric-and-brac which Huang did not use is placed in lines connecting three galleries.
There are packages, fans, bundles of ropes, machinery parts and a lot of plastic bottles, most of which were picked up on Huang's travels around the world and his visits to discount markets.
"I'm always intrigued by the shapes and functions of plastic bottles. I've always wondered what their peculiar shapes are for," Huang said.
Most interesting about Huang's tube-and-bottle life forms are their bewildering set of sensors. Although sensors are a common part of interactive works, the sensors of the two creatures in the first gallery, for instance, have quite unpredictable reactions as the viewer walks up to them, such as blinking their light bulbs or making whirling sounds.
Asked about these these "random" responses, Huang said: "That's what it's all about. It's fun."
"Adrift" and "EX-TT-03" will run through November at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Taipei, 39 Changan W Rd. (
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50