Most Germans, like most Europeans, a few years ago could only shake their heads in incredulous amusement over the fuss made in the US when former president Bill Clinton shared some kind of intimacy with a young office employee named Monica Lewinsky.
Who cares? was the general sentiment which people on the European side of the Atlantic had about the Clinton-Lewinsky tangle -- it was the president's private business and nobody else's.
Today, Germany is experiencing the same kind of soul-searching about the private sexual lives of politicians and just what, or how much, the public needs to know about it in the wake of an unsavory scandal which has rocked the northern port city of Hamburg.
In the affair, Governing Mayor Ole von Beust and his Justice Minister, Roger Kusch were outed at a press conference as homosexuals by the Interior Minister Ronald Schill in the culmination of an alleged corruption affair in the government apparatus.
Schill went on to allege that the mayor and the justice minister were also a gay couple. While astonished reporters listened, Schill mumbled remarks about how he had received "information" about the activities by the two men together which pointed to sexual acts.
The unsavoriness of Schill's remarks -- made moments after von Beust had announced he had fired him and his undersecretary in the alleged abuse of office issue -- generally angered the Hamburg public.
But it also raised questions about whether the Hamburg mayor may have helped to fuel the situation himself by having previously declined to declare his homosexuality. Schill, so the thinking in some gay quarters went, may have thought he still had some leverage over the mayor simply by dangling the threat of outing him, because von Beust steadfastly declined to declare what was regarded as an open secret in Hamburg.
It is not that von Beust -- from the right-of-center Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party which espouses family values and has a generally more conservative view on social morals -- would lack a precedent, if he did so.
Berlin's popular Social Democratic mayor Klaus Wowereit outed himself as a homosexual during the election campaign a few years ago, famously declaring: "I am gay, and that's a good thing." Voters overwhelmingly elected him to office.
In the newspaper interviews in the aftermath of the unsavory press conference remarks by Schill, Justice Minister Kusch did openly state, "Yes, I am gay." But von Beust continued to be evasive, saying sexual orientation was a private matter.
"Whether somebody is gay or heterosexual, what somebody does in bed is his own private matter," he told the mass-circulation tabloid Bild. "And by the way, I am of the opinion that homosexuality is something normal."
The rest of the interview concerned mainly his relationship with Kusch, whom the mayor has known since university days 25 years ago and who also rents an apartment owned by the mayor.
But both von Beust, 48 and Kusch, 49, flatly denied that they were a gay couple as insinuated by Schill. Von Beust acknowledged that he and Kusch in the past had been on vacation and went sailing together -- however, not alone but along with other people.
Newspaper and broadcast media commentators, political analysts and readers writing letters to the editor are all asking the same question: Are any of these private details about the mayor and the justice minister any of the public's business?
The answer appears to be yes and no. Bild in an editorial comment rhetorically asked "So what?" about the mayor's sexuality, and added, "The only thing that matters is whether he is making good or bad politics ... and whether he is treating voters respectably."
But the conservative daily Die Welt in its lead editorial did raise the issue of the Schill insinuation of cronyism in view of the mayor giving his gay friend Kusch a top political position.
While using the term "villain" to describe Schill, the editorial said, "The devil can also sometimes be right. Using this scandal as an example, it should be publicly discussed whether homosexual relationships, which in themselves should no longer be a stigma for anyone, must be looked at from the perspective of possible cronyism."
Schill's behavior in the affair was briefly investigated by federal prosecutors in the light of a possible coercion attempt.
In their last meeting with von Beust before he was fired, Schill allegedly had threatened the mayor by saying he would out von Beust and Kusch, a threat which could be interpreted under German law as coercion. Von Beust later told the weekly magazine Focus that Schill had threatened to out the mayor and justice minister on television that same evening.
Sept.16 to Sept. 22 The “anti-communist train” with then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) face plastered on the engine puffed along the “sugar railway” (糖業鐵路) in May 1955, drawing enthusiastic crowds at 103 stops covering nearly 1,200km. An estimated 1.58 million spectators were treated to propaganda films, plays and received free sugar products. By this time, the state-run Taiwan Sugar Corporation (台糖, Taisugar) had managed to connect the previously separate east-west lines established by Japanese-era sugar factories, allowing the anti-communist train to travel easily from Taichung to Pingtung’s Donggang Township (東港). Last Sunday’s feature (Taiwan in Time: The sugar express) covered the inauguration of the
The corruption cases surrounding former Taipei Mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) head Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) are just one item in the endless cycle of noise and fuss obscuring Taiwan’s deep and urgent structural and social problems. Even the case itself, as James Baron observed in an excellent piece at the Diplomat last week, is only one manifestation of the greater problem of deep-rooted corruption in land development. Last week the government announced a program to permit 25,000 foreign university students, primarily from the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia, to work in Taiwan after graduation for 2-4 years. That number is a
This year’s Michelin Gourmand Bib sported 16 new entries in the 126-strong Taiwan directory. The fight for the best braised pork rice and the crispiest scallion pancake painstakingly continued, but what stood out in the lineup this year? Pang Taqueria (胖塔可利亞); Taiwan’s first Michelin-recommended Mexican restaurant. Chef Charles Chen (陳治宇) is a self-confessed Americophile, earning his chef whites at a fine-dining Latin-American fusion restaurant. But what makes this Xinyi (信義) spot stand head and shoulders above Taipei’s existing Mexican offerings? The authenticity. The produce. The care. AUTHENTIC EATS In my time on the island, I have caved too many times to
In the aftermath of the 2020 general elections the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was demoralized. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had crushed them in a second landslide in a row, with their presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) winning more votes than any in Taiwan’s history. The KMT did pick up three legislative seats, but the DPP retained an outright majority. To take responsibility for that catastrophic loss, as is customary, party chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) resigned. This would mark the end of an era of how the party operated and the beginning of a new effort at reform, first under