Most Germans, like most Europeans, a few years ago could only shake their heads in incredulous amusement over the fuss made in the US when former president Bill Clinton shared some kind of intimacy with a young office employee named Monica Lewinsky.
Who cares? was the general sentiment which people on the European side of the Atlantic had about the Clinton-Lewinsky tangle -- it was the president's private business and nobody else's.
Today, Germany is experiencing the same kind of soul-searching about the private sexual lives of politicians and just what, or how much, the public needs to know about it in the wake of an unsavory scandal which has rocked the northern port city of Hamburg.
In the affair, Governing Mayor Ole von Beust and his Justice Minister, Roger Kusch were outed at a press conference as homosexuals by the Interior Minister Ronald Schill in the culmination of an alleged corruption affair in the government apparatus.
Schill went on to allege that the mayor and the justice minister were also a gay couple. While astonished reporters listened, Schill mumbled remarks about how he had received "information" about the activities by the two men together which pointed to sexual acts.
The unsavoriness of Schill's remarks -- made moments after von Beust had announced he had fired him and his undersecretary in the alleged abuse of office issue -- generally angered the Hamburg public.
But it also raised questions about whether the Hamburg mayor may have helped to fuel the situation himself by having previously declined to declare his homosexuality. Schill, so the thinking in some gay quarters went, may have thought he still had some leverage over the mayor simply by dangling the threat of outing him, because von Beust steadfastly declined to declare what was regarded as an open secret in Hamburg.
It is not that von Beust -- from the right-of-center Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party which espouses family values and has a generally more conservative view on social morals -- would lack a precedent, if he did so.
Berlin's popular Social Democratic mayor Klaus Wowereit outed himself as a homosexual during the election campaign a few years ago, famously declaring: "I am gay, and that's a good thing." Voters overwhelmingly elected him to office.
In the newspaper interviews in the aftermath of the unsavory press conference remarks by Schill, Justice Minister Kusch did openly state, "Yes, I am gay." But von Beust continued to be evasive, saying sexual orientation was a private matter.
"Whether somebody is gay or heterosexual, what somebody does in bed is his own private matter," he told the mass-circulation tabloid Bild. "And by the way, I am of the opinion that homosexuality is something normal."
The rest of the interview concerned mainly his relationship with Kusch, whom the mayor has known since university days 25 years ago and who also rents an apartment owned by the mayor.
But both von Beust, 48 and Kusch, 49, flatly denied that they were a gay couple as insinuated by Schill. Von Beust acknowledged that he and Kusch in the past had been on vacation and went sailing together -- however, not alone but along with other people.
Newspaper and broadcast media commentators, political analysts and readers writing letters to the editor are all asking the same question: Are any of these private details about the mayor and the justice minister any of the public's business?
The answer appears to be yes and no. Bild in an editorial comment rhetorically asked "So what?" about the mayor's sexuality, and added, "The only thing that matters is whether he is making good or bad politics ... and whether he is treating voters respectably."
But the conservative daily Die Welt in its lead editorial did raise the issue of the Schill insinuation of cronyism in view of the mayor giving his gay friend Kusch a top political position.
While using the term "villain" to describe Schill, the editorial said, "The devil can also sometimes be right. Using this scandal as an example, it should be publicly discussed whether homosexual relationships, which in themselves should no longer be a stigma for anyone, must be looked at from the perspective of possible cronyism."
Schill's behavior in the affair was briefly investigated by federal prosecutors in the light of a possible coercion attempt.
In their last meeting with von Beust before he was fired, Schill allegedly had threatened the mayor by saying he would out von Beust and Kusch, a threat which could be interpreted under German law as coercion. Von Beust later told the weekly magazine Focus that Schill had threatened to out the mayor and justice minister on television that same evening.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50