It might have created little media attention, but the display of ancient artifacts excavated by the Historical Archeology Team (HAT, 歷史考古小組) from sites in Hualien and Kinmen, which is currently on show at Taipei's National Museum of History (國立歷史博物館), is a milestone for local historians and archeologists alike.
While the 250 pieces that comprise the exhibition are only a very small percentage of the total amount unearthed by the group, it is hoped that the collection will be enough to spark public interest in a field of historical detection that is still misunderstood by much of Taiwan's populace.
"Until the director put the idea forward to form a group of experts to excavate historical sites, non-academic archeology in Taiwan was nearly non-existent," stated HAT's Chai Chen-hsiao (
PHOTO COURTESY OF THE HISTORICAL ARCHEOLOGY TEAM
Established on the recommendation of the director of the National Museum of History, Huang Kuang-nan (黃光男), and jointly funded by the museum and the Ministry of Education, HAT is the first nationally funded group to be established with the aim of locating and excavating the multitude of proven and suspected archeological sites that dot Taiwan.
Preceding the establishment of the team, which includes archeologists, historians and anthropologists, a vast majority of the archeological digs that took place in Taiwan were undertaken by two of the nation's leading institutes of higher education.
Over the years, members of the anthropology and archeological institutes of Academia Sinica (中央研究院) and National Taiwan University (國立台灣大學) have discovered a total of 179 sites of historical interest throughout Taiwan and its outlying islands. This number, however, is only a fraction of the more than 1,000 sites believed worthy of excavation.
"There are reportedly over 1,000 sites in Taiwan where experts predict that substantial finds of historical significance could be unearthed," said Chiang Kuei-chen (江桂珍), anthropologist and fellow member of HAT. "Some of these we know about because of their mention in historical tomes and others because residents of the areas have regularly reported the finding of ancient artifacts to the authorities. Of course, in addition to these, there are probably plenty of other sites we don't know about."
After spending months in Hualien early last year, where the newly formed team trained and honed its archeology skills at an already well established and extensively surveyed site, it was decided that the team's inaugural dig take place in an area where Taiwan's earliest cultural influences came ashore.
Sending an advance party to Kinmen in April last year in order to survey suspected areas of historical value, the group finally began excavations at three sites in July of 2001. The team settled for sites located in the towns of Shuitou (水頭), Chunglin (瓊林) and Kuanou (官澳) for its inaugural digs.
"We decided on Kinmen because of its historical significance. It was one of the first places in what is present-day Taiwan to be influenced by the people and culture of Southwest China," Chai explained. "Because of this, Kinmen boasts a multitude of possible sites worthy of archeological exploration."
The group spent almost a month on Kinmen and exhumed upwards of 20,000 artifacts of historical value from over a dozen plots scattered throughout the three townships.
The relics, or rather fragments of what were once household wares and the remains of food stuffs, included plates, bowls and urns as well as glazed pottery and large numbers of animal bones and shells.
While much of what was unearthed during the group's excavations on Kinmen dated from the Song dynasty (
The extensive digs on Kinmen might not have yielded any breakthrough finds, but they did provide strong evidence apropos the close historical relationship between Southeast China and Kinmen.
"Obviously we don't expect to find anything that will rewrite our history books, nor do we expect to come across any breathtaking and unblemished finds," Chiang said. "But the artifacts we did unearth certainly lead us to believe that Kinmen is a crucial cog in Taiwan's overall cultural history."
While it is hoped that the team's continued findings will lead to a better understanding of the cultural origins of the peoples of Taiwan, the task set before them will certainly not be completed overnight.
Because the team currently consists of only seven members, surveys and excavations -- not to mention the collating of results -- are proving lengthy affairs. And, according to Chang, things will probably slow down even more if public interest and academic support wane.
"While we could obviously do with more members, seven is okay to have present at a dig. It gets a bit messy and out of hand the more people you have trampling around," Chiang said. "I can imagine that it will be the slow axing of our annual budget that will finally bring the curtain down on the whole affair. I'm sure we're pretty near the bottom of all the national funding lists."
It's not only a question of cash, however. In addition to funds, the sluggish pace of excavating and cataloging of results is supplemented by the fact that the group's work remains a part-time venture.
Between April and May this year the group traveled to Penghu and excavated two sites. The thousands of artifacts unearthed during the month-long dig are still packed in plastic crates waiting for cleaning, classification and cataloging nearly six months after excavation.
"I guess, or rather I hope, we'll get around to sorting it all out sometime this year," Chiang said. "But as we all hold full-time positions with academic institutes, finding the time to get together to do this will, no doubt, prove a more painstaking problem than actually digging the holes in the ground."
It's not all bad news for HAT, though. While the problems with funding and work schedules continue to hamper the team's capacity to pursue its task of unearthing Taiwan's long-buried past, its members remain optimistic.
Plans are already being drawn up for next year's dig, which at present looks set to take place in either Tainan or Penghu.
Cheng Ching-hsiang (鄭青祥) turned a small triangle of concrete jammed between two old shops into a cool little bar called 9dimension. In front of the shop, a steampunk-like structure was welded by himself to serve as a booth where he prepares cocktails. “Yancheng used to be just old people,” he says, “but now young people are coming and creating the New Yancheng.” Around the corner, Yu Hsiu-jao (饒毓琇), opened Tiny Cafe. True to its name, it is the size of a cupboard and serves cold-brewed coffee. “Small shops are so special and have personality,” she says, “people come to Yancheng to find such treasures.” She
The low voter turnout for the referendum on Aug. 23 shows that many Taiwanese are apathetic about nuclear energy, but there are long-term energy stakes involved that the public needs to grasp Taiwan faces an energy trilemma: soaring AI-driven demand, pressure to cut carbon and reliance on fragile fuel imports. But the nuclear referendum on Aug. 23 showed how little this registered with voters, many of whom neither see the long game nor grasp the stakes. Volunteer referendum worker Vivian Chen (陳薇安) put it bluntly: “I’ve seen many people asking what they’re voting for when they arrive to vote. They cast their vote without even doing any research.” Imagine Taiwanese voters invited to a poker table. The bet looked simple — yes or no — yet most never showed. More than two-thirds of those
In the run-up to the referendum on re-opening Pingtung County’s Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant last month, the media inundated us with explainers. A favorite factoid of the international media, endlessly recycled, was that Taiwan has no energy reserves for a blockade, thus necessitating re-opening the nuclear plants. As presented by the Chinese-language CommonWealth Magazine, it runs: “According to the US Department of Commerce International Trade Administration, 97.73 percent of Taiwan’s energy is imported, and estimates are that Taiwan has only 11 days of reserves available in the event of a blockade.” This factoid is not an outright lie — that
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu’s (洪秀柱) attendance at the Chinese Communist Party’s (CPP) “Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War” parade in Beijing is infuriating, embarrassing and insulting to nearly everyone in Taiwan, and Taiwan’s friends and allies. She is also ripping off bandages and pouring salt into old wounds. In the process she managed to tie both the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) into uncomfortable knots. The KMT continues to honor their heroic fighters, who defended China against the invading Japanese Empire, which inflicted unimaginable horrors on the
RSS