Robert D. Kaplan has made a name for himself by traveling to the world's most uncomfortable and dangerous places and returning with hair-raising predictions of impending military and/or political chaos in the countries he visited.
He was on the money in his book Balkan Ghosts, which foresaw a violent rift along ethnic lines in Yugoslavia, and may yet be proven correct in his assessments of political meltdown in West Africa, Pakistan and Indonesia in The Coming Anarchy and To the Ends of the Earth.
With his latest book Warrior Politics: Why Leadership Requires a Pagan Ethos, Kaplan breaks the pattern of travel writing coupled with political reportage and stays home to delve into the territory of political science and military history. These are areas in which Kaplan admits to being a layman and that don't permit the trenchant personal observations that made his previous books so compelling.
For this reason Warrior Politics starts out promising with a chapter that echoes his more travel-based books, but then fizzles as Kaplan attempts in some 200 pages to formulate a guideline for foreign policy based on the wisdom of Livy, Thucydides, Sun-tzu (孫子), Machiavelli and Hobbes, among others.
Nevertheless, Kaplan's main premise that the great minds of antiquity should be the guiding lights to policy making in the contemporary world is a fascinating one and one that seems well grounded.
Kaplan writes: "As future crises arrive in steep waves, our leaders will realize that the world is not `modern' or `postmodern,' but only a continuation of the `ancient': A world that, despite its technologies, the best Chinese, Greek and Roman philosophers might have been able to cope with."
The ancient world, as Kaplan describes it, was a nasty and brutish place where only the strong survived. Summarizing Hobbes, he writes: "Altruism is unnatural, human beings are rapacious, the struggle of every man against every other is the natural condition of humanity, and reason is usually impotent against passion." True leadership then requires the measured and "self-interested" application of power and a policy's moral value will be judged according to its consequences not its intentions.
Though this sounds dangerously close to an apology for warmongering and the forceful spread of democracy and American values, Kaplan cautions against this trend. He draws a line between widening US power and exporting its system. To make his point, he quotes Sun-tzu: "The side that knows when to fight and when not will take the victory. There are roadways not to be traveled, armies not to be attacked, walled cities not to be assaulted." A war over human rights, for example, may be a fight not worth fighting.
What Kaplan warns against is the strain of idealism, rooted in the Judeo-Christian tradition, that dominated liberal thinking at the end of the Cold War that would pin its hopes on democracy and free markets as a panacea for the developing world.
Herein lies the crux of Kaplan's world view: that beyond the small group of countries that play by the rules of international law and trade, lawlessness prevails and what motivates and influences people is raw power. To deal with the groups or countries that will doubtless be nipping at the heels of the family of democratic nations in the coming century, Kaplan favors wielding a big stick.
He has made this case more forcefully, though, in his previous books that have used his observations of the economic disparities, environmental degradation, exploding urban populations and tribalism that are threatening struggling nations.
For the most part, Warrior Politics is a patchwork of historical examples and analyses that are alarming in their low regard for humanity and aggressive tone, but do not always mesh together. At what point, for example, does masterly inactivity become dangerous? And can't the lessons of the past be applied to avert crises?
Despite its weaknesses, Warrior Politics is an important book because Kaplan's thinking often gains currency in the halls of power in Washington and elsewhere and because the world is increasingly looking to be as "ancient" as he warns it is.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50