Normally, when you see someone wave an admonitory finger and "talk of God's law," you know you're in the presence of costume drama.
But Seasons Player' production of Robert Bolt's A Man for all Seasons looks as if it will be something rather different. Played in modern dress, it will, in the words of producer Carl Davies, be an austere production of an austere play.
The venue is an elegant rosewood teahouse and performance space near the Taipei World Trade Center. At a rehearsal on Wednesday evening it took a few moments to shift from the ambiance of classical China to London in the 16th century. But once the change of key was made, the comparisons were obvious enough. As one of the actors pointed out, the play takes place in an England when imprisonment without trial and confessions extracted under torture were both commonplace.
First performed in 1960, and made into a classic film starring Paul Scofield in 1966, A Man for all Seasons tells the story of Thomas More, executed for treason in 1535 after having been Henry Vlll's highest-ranking official. He had refused to give his approval to the king's break with the Roman Church, and the establishment in its place of the Church of England.
"As Bolt remarks, there's a point beyond which some people won't go," said Davies. "I see Thomas More and Nelson Mandela as two such men. More paid with his life, Mandela with his long years in jail. What this play is about is integrity." The production has attracted a strong team for its More, Davies getting the measure of the devious and cruel Thomas Cromwell, and Dean Karalekas and Paul Barlow both effective as the Duke of Norfolk and The Common Man, respectively.
A Man for All Seasons will be staged at 7:30 the Han Tang Yuefu Auditorium, 12th Fl., 48 Keelung Rd., Sec. 2, Taipei (臺北市基隆路二段48號12樓) tomorrow and Sunday and on Aug. 4 and Aug. 5. Tickets are NT$250. For further information, call 0930-796-864.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50