Out on the court, Taiwan's very own "Dr J," Hongkuo Elephant guard Cheng Chih-lung, is doing his stuff as a new addition to the Shanghai Sharks while the Taiwan league is dormant.
Behind him, the crowd in Shanghai is roaring, some on their feet as he weaves his way through a key-full of Shandong Bulls to put a lay-up off the board.
The shot drops in just as smoothly as he slithered through the lane. But as he does so one of the Bulls cranks down hard on his shirt.
Immediately he hits the ground, scowling at the referee who stands nearby.
"Did you see that?" He flings his arms wide and tugs at his shirt. The referee ignores him and the game rolls on.
"It's old fogey ball out there," Cheng quips after the game. "It's like Taiwan about ten years ago."
Perhaps. But while basketball may be rougher in China, at least they're still playing. Taiwan's Chinese Basketball Alliance halted play indefinitely last March, with reported losses of up to US$39 million over a five-year period.
Uncertain future
Just this week, the Alliance announced it will be back on its feet by March, but the league's future actually remains uncertain. Cheng and others believe the only thing that can guarantee its future is the creation of an Asia-wide league, similar to the NBA, that draws the other regional leagues together.
Says Cheng: "No matter whether it's South Korea, Philippines, Japan, the [individual] market is too small. In the end it is difficult to raise a league. In the end it is better to work through the market of Asia."
Taiwan boasts some two million court hounds. But by the end of last season, the league rarely drew more than 2,000 spectators per game.
Some critics say the league tumbled over the last five years because it became a showcase for corporate sponsorship. Others say a more serious problem was that the league lacked a professional management organization, being managed instead in rotation by the owners of the teams competing in the league. The result: infighting and score-settling.
"Whenever we run into problems no one works through them," Cheng says. "They just fight over little things."
But whatever the reasons for the decline, the chief challenge for anyone seeking to revive Taiwan's league is getting punters back into the stalls. And increasing numbers of industry insiders are beginning to argue that the way to achieve this is by reaching out to Asia.
"Basketball as a spectator sport in other countries like Japan and Korea has a better foundation, because there is a home-visitor phenomenon," says William Wu, former head of marketing for Nike Taiwan.
Wu concedes that attendance remains fairly low for local matches even in Korea and Japan, and says international matches typically attract larger crowds.
"I don't think the local league can go anywhere unless it is a pre-Asian league," he says.
Getting an Asian league off the ground is no simple task, though.
Carl Ching, President of the Asian Basketball Confederation, has been working toward that end for 10 years now. He launched the first Asian Basketball Super League last year, but its start, after more than four years of trial games, was bumpy. But this year he will be joined in his efforts by Daniel Chiang, a hi-tech business leader, who is stepping in to help revamp the league.
Shifting gears
Better known as the man who founded Trend Micro and Sina.Com, both billion-dollar companies, Chiang is now shifting his sights from the World Wide Web and computer viruses to the basketball court.
Over the past six months, he has been involved in just about every possible aspect of basketball in Asia.
Whether it was Cheng Chih-lung's shift to the Shanghai Sharks or Taiwan's hosting of the Sinacup last July, Chiang has been there in some shape or form.
Chiang says that as Sina.Com prepares for its Initial Public Offering the opportunity to channel more energy into basketball gets ever closer -- and basketball, he says, is the thing he enjoys the most.
"Right now I am only devoting 10 percent of my time to this. After the IPO I want to start doing more," he said.
Chiang has his work cut out for him. An Asian Basketball League has been a long time in the making, and even now, as it finally becomes a possibility, its success is by no means guaranteed. The launch of the Asian Basketball Super League last year was troubled by an imbalance of skill from team to team, lack of funds and a complicated competition scheme, critics charged.
Preparation was a serious problem, Ching admits. "We only had one month to get everything together because teams kept on delaying to sign up."
To make things worse, says Ching, Japan pulled out its top players beforehand to participate in the Olympic trials in Sydney.
In the end, lack of sponsorship and revenue ended up causing the new league to foot US$4 million in deficit.
But, according to organizers, such problems are going to be a thing of the past when the Asian Basketball Super League is re-launched this year as 2000 ABA. For starters, the league already has its six teams on board.
The 2000 ABA has also pulled Richard Avory, the former senior vice president of the International Management Group, on board.
Avory, who brings with him more than 20 years of experience promoting sports in cities throughout Asia, as well as helping create the Chinese Basketball Association, shares Chiang's and Ching's optimism.
"Basketball has a huge potential in Asia even with some hiccups like in Taiwan last year," Avory says.
Ching agrees. "According to what I've read in the papers, the NBA last year made US$40 billion. If we could just make one percent of that, that would be enough."
This year the league has budgeted US$2 million, and Chiang has said he will help foot the bill if anything goes wrong.
It's a gamble he says will eventually pay off.
"If Asia has a population of 3.8 billion people and we can't make money off of this, that would be pretty bad," he says.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50