Most Taiwanese universities opened on March 2 for the new semester following a two-week delay. To prevent suspending classes or quarantining students because of COVID-19, the Ministry of Education has encouraged schools to adopt a policy of “suspending classes without suspending learning.”
Every university department needed to prepare online courses as a plan B to allow students to continue their education through self-studies if classes are suspended or if they are placed under home quarantine.
The advantage of online courses is that they eliminate restrictions on time and space, and they are often presented in well-designed multimedia formats. Is there a risk that online courses would replace traditional teacher-taught courses and that the university teaching scene could become a studio for filming lectures?
In Taiwan, “massive open online courses” are transliterated into Chinese as muke (慕課) or mokeshi (磨課師). These courses are available on platforms such as Coursera, Udacity and edX, which have triggered a wave of open education at universities around the world since 2010.
Lecturers frequently use these resources as supplementary materials for their courses.
This raises questions about whether these resources and educational videos mean that students could simply watch these materials repeatedly and then ask questions or discuss the topic online. If that is the case, would teachers have fulfilled their duties?
In my own experience, there are two reasons that make it difficult to replace classroom instruction:
First, look at a different question: Can the best video recording and sound equipment replace attendance at a live symphony or concert?
Learning is more like a process of interpersonal interaction. In addition to the interaction between teacher and students, interaction among students is also an important element in promoting learning.
Through face-to-face lectures, questions and discussion, the interactive process — including eye contact, the tone or manner of speaking, and body movements — creates a sense of presence that only exists in the classroom. This also serves as a “learning catalyst” that is difficult to replace with online courses.
Second, the reason that a sense of presence is so important is that students can feel the instructor’s persistence in expertise and knowledge and how this inspires the instructor.
After all, teachers are not dealing with a group of robots, and the output of knowledge cannot be done simply by entering some commands like “because a, therefore b” and so on.
University instructors have a responsibility to harness their passion for knowledge to inspire and motivate students to learn and guide their imagination about the topic they are studying.
Universities are responsible to pass on, as well as create, knowledge, and a lot of knowledge is produced incidentally in a flash of inspiration during face-to-face interaction.
The COVID-19 outbreak hopefully will come to an early end, and people should agree that adopting online courses is only a temporary solution during the epidemic prevention period, because instruction in the lecture hall is still indispensable for universities, as it allows teachers to pass on knowledge in a more humanistic way.
Wen Tzai-hung is a professor of geography at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS