Carlos Viloria came home to Venezuela last month. A 35-year-old lawyer, he had had enough of 15-hour days and abusive bosses as a restaurant worker in Argentina for a year and a half, one of more than 5 million Venezuelans who have left over the past five years, hoping to escape one of the world’s worst humanitarian catastrophes.
His return is also emblematic.
“I’m going to find a job that pays in dollars,” he said.
Illustration: Mountain People
After leading his nation’s economy over a cliff, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has brought it a certain measure of stability. By allowing US dollars to flow freely and private enterprise to flourish in recent months, he seems to have breathed new life into his regime. He remains widely despised, but emigration has begun to slow, people are returning, and the government is enacting laws to tax US dollar transactions and allow companies to issue debt in foreign currencies.
All are signs that, despite a triumphant world tour — including a White House meeting with US President Donald Trump — Venezuelan National Assembly President Juan Guaido, the opposition leader, is further away from ousting Maduro than he was a year ago when he announced that plan and won wide international support.
At the time, many wrote off Maduro. He had, after all, taken one of the region’s richest countries and run it into the ground through corruption and colossal mismanagement. Then a year ago, the US smacked Maduro with sanctions on oil. His country took a big hit and many believed he could not survive.
However, the doubters did not realize how much help he would get from key allies to evade sanctions or how he would adopt a version of Chinese-style state capitalism.
“The economies of the countries that have helped us are capitalist — China, Turkey and India,” said David Paravisini, a lawmaker in Venezuela’s National Constituent Assembly associated with Maduro. “To get their aid, you need conditions of economic liberalism. That’s what China did to move forward. It’s what we have to do.”
The new approach includes secret talks Maduro has had with holders of about US$60 billion of bonds, some of them American, offering to pair them up with a foreign drilling company that would be granted the rights to oil fields as a means of their recouping debt.
Venezuela has the world’s largest known oil reserves and if this deal came to fruition, many investors could reap enormous profits.
Several people who have met with Maduro recently say he is more confident than they have seen him in a long time. They spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Elliott Abrams, the US special envoy for Venezuela, disagrees.
“Why is this happening?” he asked reporters on Thursday last week, referring to the dollarization and privatization. “Because their backs are against the wall.”
Over the past year, the US dollar has become Venezuela’s unofficial currency, appearing in cafeteria menus and mom-and-pop shop windows blocks from the presidential palace. Across the capital, bodegas filled with French Champagne, vacuum-sealed salmon and Grana Padano cheese appeared where bankrupt shops had once been. The bolivar, the official currency, has become worthless through years of hyperinflation.
“What we saw wasn’t a liberalization, but a permissiveness, and in some cases a legal framework that existed, but wasn’t enforced,” said Tamara Herrera, chief economist at Caracas-based consultancy Sintesis Financiera. “The need arose because of progressively intensifying US sanctions. The new decrees show the government’s fiscal hunger and punitive nature.”
Oil production, after plunging for nearly a decade, is finally stabilizing at 800,000 barrels a day, stemming some of the economic hemorrhaging. This year’s projected contraction, while still stunning at 10 percent, is a far cry from 35 percent a year ago and 65 percent in the past five years.
The National Constituent Assembly last month approved a value-added tax (VAT) to reap benefit from the estimated 70 percent of all transactions this year set to occur in US dollars.
Until now, the government had not collected VAT on US dollar sales, a lost opportunity to make up for a dramatic drop in revenue.
“We are doing this now because there are signs that point to a recovery of the economy,” Venezuelan lawmaker Jesus Faria said. “But we have a highly speculative economy in which price fixers, especially merchants, take every opportunity to set and obtain extraordinary profits, and incentives for national production must be created through more efficient policies.”
This has meant an abrupt return to some statist socialism. Venezuela’s price-control agency said it inspected more than 1,900 stores last month.
Venezuelan Minister of Commerce Eneida Laya said that 135 agents had been dispatched across the nation to “end the speculative economy.”
Scrutiny had declined in recent months. The government is watching closely again.
“They came last week to tell us to cut our profits to 30 percent, which we had to do, but it hurt our business,” said Maria Luisa Pereira, who sells flour, rice and condiments at Quinta Crespo market in western Caracas. “How can we survive on so little with hyperinflation? They hadn’t been here in months and now they threatened us to come two more times in February. We’re afraid.”
Meanwhile, fewer Venezuelans are leaving, according to two polling firms, Datanalisis and Delphos.
In a December report from Datanalisis, those expressing a desire to leave the country fell to 38 percent, down 5 points from a year before.
Of those who have emigrated in the past five years, 17 percent, or about 1 million, have returned over the same period, the data showed.
Maduro’s government says it has overseen the return of more than 17,000 since 2018 through the “Come back to the fatherland” plan.
The UN still projects that this year, the number of emigrating Venezuelans would surpass the 6 million Syrians who have been driven from their homeland.
There has been an irony about the Venezuelan emigration that the government knows, but does not mention: Those who leave send remittances in US dollars, and also reduce the numbers needing to be fed and housed.
Research company Ecoanalitica estimates that remittances would rise from US$2.7 billion in 2018 to US$4 billion this year.
The emigration of Venezuelans has slowed recently not only because of new opportunities at home, but because of new restrictions and xenophobic backlash abroad, Datanalisis head Luis Vicente Leon said.
“The barriers in those countries are increasing dramatically and make exit more difficult, especially for those without visas or resources,” Leon said.
“Also, with the dollarization, staying home seems to be less traumatic than emigrating,” he said.
Viloria said he found life there hard.
“At the beginning, they required me to work too many hours, 15 hours a day sometimes, and they paid me much less than the minimum wage,” he said. “I couldn’t complain or I’d get fired. They made me stand for 10 hours straight, I only had 15 minutes to eat, and many times I had to eat standing.”
He rented a small room in an apartment he shared with two others. He often felt unwelcome.
“Some of the Argentine managers were xenophobic,” he said. “Once they told a Venezuelan partner that he had come from Venezuela like a cockroach.”
“In Venezuela we have water and electricity failures, but at least I live in my house,” he said. “In Argentina, it’s true that I could walk around safely at night and there are a lot of cultural events, but I spent all my time working, often being mistreated, and the money wasn’t enough. I’m putting my hopes in dollarization.”
The Comedy Club on Fuxing N Road in Taipei was vandalized with paint bombs mixed with feces on May 29, allegedly because one of its performers had satirized Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The incident has triggered concerns about the growing threat from China’s cross-border repression within Taiwan. On the day of the attack, a comedian surnamed Huang (黃), who is known for mocking Xi, was the headline performer. The Comedy Club founder said the assault was obviously politically motivated. China, which Freedom House said “conducts the most sophisticated, extensive and far-reaching campaign of transnational repression in the world,” has
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) at a press conference last week repeated the same, tired line, claiming that Taiwan’s future should be “decided jointly by the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people, including Taiwan compatriots.” The statement is absurd. Virtually every word is incorrect, with some parts mistaken to an astonishing degree. First, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never included Taiwan. When the Republic of China’s (ROC) original five-colored flag was established in 1912, Taiwan was still under Japanese rule. When the PRC was founded in 1949, Taiwan was under the control of president Chiang
Following the outbreak of conflict in Iran, TikTok was flooded with videos targeting Taiwanese users. Many featured artificial intelligence (AI)-generated anchors posing as Taiwanese broadcasters with localized traditional Chinese subtitles. The videos warned of imminent social collapse due to liquefied natural gas shortages, blamed the Democratic Progressive Party and its alleged failed energy policies for a fabricated crisis, and used recycled footage from unrelated events to create the impression Taiwan stood on the edge of systemic breakdown. By saturating the information environment with falsehoods or selectively edited material designed to trigger emotional responses, malign actors can exploit cognitive vulnerabilities and
Taiwan’s leading position in the global semiconductor industry is not, as some claim, based on misconceptions, a result of “stealing.” It was built upon formal, transparent and costly technology transfer agreements between the Taiwanese government and US enterprises half a century ago. According to the oral history of Hu Ding-hua (胡定華), a pioneer in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, the origin of Taiwan’s integrated circuit (IC) technology dates back to the “IC pilot factory” in the 1970s. The implementation of this project fully complied with international commercial standards and legal procedures. First, the project completed formal contract signing and payment. In 1975,