The US Department of Homeland Security has fined several companies for evading US President Donald Trump’s tariffs on imports from China by rerouting them through Cambodia’s Sihanoukville Special Economic Zone.
The Chinese-owned zone highlights how Cambodia, acting as China’s compliant and corrupt colony, threatens the enforcement of Trump’s tariffs and, more broadly, US interests in the region.
China is Cambodia’s largest aid donor, investor and creditor, and Sihanoukville — Cambodia’s only deep-sea port, through which about 70 percent of the country’s trade moves — is the first link in the chain of China’s massive transnational infrastructure investment scheme, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
However, far from becoming rich from BRI investments, Cambodia is being crushed by them.
Chinese businesses operating in the zone buy and sell from one another, meaning that local people do not see any of the wealth they bring to Cambodia.
On the contrary, living conditions for Cambodians in fast-growing Sihanoukville are deteriorating rapidly, owing to a lack of effective land-use planning or community-focused investment.
Just last month, a seven-story Chinese-owned building in the city collapsed, killing at least 18 people, with others still missing.
At the end of May, a Chinese-owned hotel and casino was forced to close, after the environmental group Mother Nature Cambodia discovered that it had been deliberately pumping raw sewage into the sea.
Urban planners predict that, within 30 years, Sihanoukville will have 1 million inhabitants — and be a failed city.
Cambodia’s capacity to alter its fate is limited. Like many other small countries in the region, it is being squeezed by the exorbitant interest rates, predatory loan practices and opaque contracts that characterize China’s “new colonialism.”
Many of the developers pouring money into Cambodian real estate and casinos, which cater exclusively to Chinese guests, are tied to the Chinese mafia and triad gangs. Like a loan-sharking victim, Cambodia’s debt is now so high that compliance with China’s political and diplomatic demands is the only alternative.
However, the Cambodian government is far from being a blameless victim. According to the World Justice Project, Cambodia ranks 125th out of 126 countries for adherence to the rule of law, and it ranked 161st out of 180 countries and territories on Transparency International’s 2018 Corruption Perceptions Index.
Moreover, the 2018 Anti-Money Laundering Index rated Cambodia the seventh-riskiest country out of 129, worse than Nicaragua, Pakistan and Yemen.
A high risk of money laundering, the report said, is strongly correlated with weak public institutions, the absence of political rights and the rule of law, and restrictions on press freedom.
In February, the Financial Action Task Force, the global money laundering watchdog, echoed this assessment, returning Cambodia to its “gray” watch list just four years after its removal.
The country has made minimal use of financial intelligence to investigate money laundering and terrorism financing; as a result, no money laundering case has ever been prosecuted in the country, the task force said.
That is unlikely to change any time soon. Under the leadership of Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, the country has become a haven for companies eager to circumvent rules — like those imposed by the US — that threaten their bottom line.
For example, in 2017, the US Customs and Border Protection agency found “substantial evidence” that Ceka Nutrition had been exporting Chinese-origin glycine, a chemical compound used in foods and pharmaceuticals, through Cambodia to avoid an US anti-dumping duty.
It was hardly an isolated case.
Last year, the US private security firm Academi (formerly Blackwater), which agreed in 2010 to pay a US$42 million fine for violating US export rules, identified Cambodia as a target for BRI-related investment.
The economic zone’s denial that any company operating there had been fined by the US reinforces the suspicion that Hun Sen’s government will continue to turn a blind eye.
This might be good for a corrupt few, but it is bad for Cambodia. Already, the country’s deteriorating record on democracy and human rights is threatening its tariff-free access to the EU market, provided through the bloc’s “Everything But Arms” trade regime. The last thing Cambodia needs is also to risk economic reprisal for helping Chinese firms to dodge US tariffs. Yet that seems to be exactly what Hun Sen’s government plans to do.
To restore its credibility, Cambodia must return to the democratic path laid out in the Comprehensive Cambodian Peace Agreement of 1991, building strong, transparent local institutions capable of reliably policing flows of goods and money through the country.
Unfortunately, there is little reason to believe that Hun Sen will take this approach. That does not bode well for the US’ ability to enforce its trade tariffs against China — or for Cambodia’s future.
Sam Rainsy, the Cambodian minister of finance from 1993 to 1994, is the cofounder and acting president of the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recent global media coverage of Taiwan has at times reduced the nation’s success in containing the spread of COVID-19 to some East Asian values such as cooperation with social control or Confucianism. An article in Wired magazine debunks this myth, crediting the nation’s success to democracy and transparency. It is appalling to learn that this misconception still exists. Here is one thing that world citizens should keep in mind: Taiwan is the first and only country in Asia that has legalized same-sex marriage. There is nothing Confucian about that. If anything, the Confucian legacy is a major obstacle that Taiwanese
The novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 — or the Wuhan virus, after the Chinese city from which it emerged — could not have come at a more advantageous time for China’s communist government. Not for the Chinese people, of course, thousands of whom have perished because of Beijing’s lack of transparency, disinformation and cruel refusal to cooperate with international public health organizations. No, the advantage goes exclusively to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), whose deceptive practices unleashed the deadly virus to the world. To understand how Beijing benefits from the pandemic, it is necessary
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), tasked with reforming the party and returning it to the viable political force that it once was, is faced with a Gordian knot. The complexities of the job ahead go beyond appealing to a younger generation of voters. Chiang might have to decide between jettisoning much of what the party originally stood for and preparing it for a return to the Presidential Office, or doubling down on its founding purpose and representing what is increasingly, in the current state of Taiwanese politics, a minority view. The KMT, as the founding party and self-proclaimed champion
Although concerned over the impact of many citizens returning from Europe and the US while those nations cope with soaring COVID-19 infection rates, Taiwan has handled the pandemic with alacrity and seems to be successfully managing the process compared with many others, including European nations and the US. Despite its proximity to China, by March 3, Taiwan had only 42 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and one death, while Japan had 287 cases and six deaths and South Korea had 4,812 cases and 28 deaths. This is of considerable interest internationally because Taiwan is not only located near China, but is relatively densely