Last week, Taiwan became the first Asian nation to legalize same-sex marriage after lawmakers passed the Enforcement Act of Judicial Yuan Constitutional Interpretation No. 748 (司法院釋字第748號解釋施行法). The legislation’s enactment is a huge stride forward for human rights in Taiwan, especially considering the controversy that surrounded the same-sex marriage referendum in November last year.
However, enactment of the law does not mean that same-sex marriage is irrevocable.
Buoyed by the support of groups opposed to same-sex marriage — which receive generous funding from religious communities — as well as intolerant older voters and the support of many lawmakers, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) has stated that if the electorate votes for a majority Legislative Yuan opposed to same-sex marriage in next year’s presidential election, the law would be repealed.
A counter-attack during next year’s elections must be anticipated.
This was taken up by Bloomberg, which ran an article headlined “Taiwan leader stakes career on landmark gay marriage vote” on the day the law was passed, saying that President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has taken a significant political gamble by pushing forward with the legalization of same-sex marriage.
While the law does not exist to pander to prejudices, those responsible for drafting laws must nevertheless ensure that they carry the public with them. Good law establishes a basic set of rules that people are able to abide by.
This principle is directly opposed by KMT Legislator Kung Wen-chi (孔文吉), who is on record as saying: “Taiwan is a country where God exercises ultimate power.”
Kung is wrong. Democracy and human rights are always the highest guiding principles of a truly democratic nation.
Nevertheless, in a democracy there is always a gap between expectation and reality. In reality, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must hold on to power at next year’s elections, including their majority in the legislature. Otherwise, all that Tsai and her party are working so hard to protect, including Taiwan’s sovereignty and same-sex marriage rights, could be overturned by the KMT.
Writing in the Washington Post on March 28, columnist Josh Rogin cited Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chen Ming-tong (陳明通) as saying that “next year’s election might be the last meaningful election in Taiwan” if Beijing is successful in its efforts to help the KMT regain power.
Not only would this mean the beginning of the process of unification, but all the rights that the DPP has helped Taiwanese to fight for and win — including same-sex marriage — could also begin to be unpicked. It would be a critical inflection point for Taiwan’s democracy.
With the passing of the act, same-sex marriage has been enshrined into law. Even though some compromises were made to get the act through the legislature, which might not have met everyone’s expectations, the government quite properly took into account the differing viewpoints of the public while drafting the legislation.
Taiwanese must now redouble their efforts to defend their values: Only then will the rainbow continue to arc across the sky.
Never forget that the defense of democratic rights is an ongoing struggle. There still exist many threats in and outside of Taiwan that jeopardize the hard-won values of its young democracy. Taiwanese must keep up the fight.
Chen Kuan-fu is a research student at National Taipei University’s Department of Law.
Translated by Edward Jones
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS