Do not discourage travel
As a partially retired college professor who vigorously encourages his students to step outside their “comfort zone” and spend at least a semester studying in another country, I have some concerns with the tone of your article (“Student leader warns on China tours,” May 14, page 1).
I have absolutely no argument with the advice to “beware,” especially for students from Taiwan traveling to China, but let us tone down the fear-mongering rhetoric. If we really want our young men and women — our future government and business leaders — to succeed, we must encourage, not discourage, them to experience life for themselves.
This is a pragmatic approach. With the proliferation of traditional and social media available to one and all today, the dismissive: “Trust me; I’ll tell you what you need to know” simply does not work. Our future leaders should be urged to learn for themselves, to ask questions when confronted with challenges, and to think critically, digging deep into the situation and applying logic to the solution.
Taiwan has every right to be proud of its youth. They are confident, well-educated young men and women who are laser-focused on success, but they must be allowed to spread their own proverbial wings and learn to fly.
At the same time, as adults, we should be leading by example. Cowering in the back corner of our bedroom closet and refusing to venture out of our comfortably familiar neighborhood tells younger generations that it is okay to be ignorant, to not know what lies around the corner or across the seas.
To question is good, as is to challenge. More important, though, is to be curious; to ask the “why” and “how” questions that will draw open the knowledge-darkening curtains and allow in the light of understanding.
So, “yes” to those students and others who have received or are considering offers to travel to China and elsewhere. Take advantage of the opportunity to experience life for yourself. Be aware of what others have cautioned, but call on your own inherent intelligence to draw your own conclusions.
As the British poet Alexander Pope (1688-1744) said so well in 1709 in his Essay on Criticism: “A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring.”
Kirk Hazlett
Adjunct professor at the University of Tampa, Florida
Silencing the press
When Dennis Peng (彭文正) and his guests were having a routine politico-economic talk show on Formosa TV on April 22, all of a sudden, without any warning, the show was cut off.
Audiences in Taiwan and overseas were extremely disappointed and displeased.
This incident was reportedly due to the constructive comments and suggestions made by the popular show to the central government. It is an unprecedented insult to freedom of the press and speech in Taiwan.
The National Communications Commission and the Control Yuan should order Formosa TV to show, without delay, the recorded but aborted portion of the program on the day of national disgrace. The persons who caused this incident should be held responsible.
Unfortunately, commentator Yao Li-ming (姚立明) has also been silenced, and authors Ching Heng-wei (金恒煒) and Cao Changqing (曹長青) have been asked not to write any more articles for their special newspaper columns.
How can such uncivilized political oppression occur in Taiwan? Can Taiwan still claim to be a free, democratic country?
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s