It is beginning to look like US President Donald Trump will yield to the Chinese in America’s trade conflict with China. The US threatened to increase tariffs on imports from China from to 25 percent from 10 percent today if no agreement was reached. However, Trump recently said that the date is flexible and might be postponed because of the progress being made in the ongoing bilateral talks.
Fair enough, but progress is in the eyes of the beholder. The most important problem that needs to be resolved is not America’s massive bilateral trade deficit with China. It is that the Chinese are stealing US firms’ technology and using it to help Chinese companies compete with those same firms in China and around the world.
The Chinese do this in two ways. First, US firms that want to do business in China are required to have a Chinese partner and to share their technology with that firm. That compulsory sharing of technology is explicitly forbidden by WTO rules. Since joining the WTO in 2001, the Chinese have ignored this rule and disingenuously claim that US firms voluntarily agree to share their technology because they want to be active in China.
INTERNET
Second, the Chinese use the Internet to enter the computer systems of US firms and steal technology and blueprints.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) agreed with then-US president Barack Obama in 2015 that his government would stop doing this. However, after a temporary decline, such cybertheft has resumed, presumably because state-owned companies and others have the ability to reach into the computer systems of US firms.
Despite Trump’s upbeat talk about progress in the talks, there is no suggestion that the Chinese will agree to stop stealing technology. Instead, Beijing’s chief negotiator, Chinese Vice Premier Liu He (劉鶴), has emphasized that the Chinese will reduce their large bilateral trade surplus by buying US soy beans and natural gas. A sharp reduction in the US trade deficit with China would enable Trump to claim victory and give him something to celebrate when Xi visits him at his home in Florida sometime in the next few months.
There are easy bragging rights in a dramatic reduction of the US trade deficit with China, which, year after year, has been the largest of America’s bilateral trade deficits. In 2017, the deficit with China was US$375 billion, or two-thirds of the total US trade deficit. So the Chinese are clever to offer to buy enough US commodities to cut that very visible imbalance.
GLOBAL TRADE
However, while that would reduce the bilateral trade deficit with China, it would have no effect by itself on the total US trade deficit. As every student of economics knows, a trade deficit reflects the fact that a country chooses to consume more than it produces. As long as a country consumes more than it produces, it must import the difference from the rest of the world.
If the Chinese do buy enough to reduce the bilateral trade deficit, the US would end up importing more from other countries or exporting less to other countries. The total US trade deficit will not decline unless the US reduces total demand by saving more. That is a matter for US policymakers; it is not something the Chinese can do for America.
US Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin has emphasized another largely irrelevant Chinese offer: a promise to prevent the value of the yuan from declining relative to the US dollar. While a stronger yuan would make Chinese goods less attractive to US buyers, thereby reducing the bilateral trade deficit, it would not reduce America’s global trade imbalance.
VARIATIONS
Moreover, although the yuan-greenback exchange rate varies from year to year, the variations have been small. Today, a US dollar buys 6.7 yuan; a year ago, the dollar exchange rate was 6.3 yuan and two years ago it was 6.9 yuan. A decade ago, in February 2009, a dollar bought 6.8 yuan. In short, there is nothing to celebrate if the Chinese agree to stabilize the value of their currency relative to the US dollar.
The key issue is technology theft. Unless the Chinese agree to stop stealing technology, and the two sides devise a way to enforce that agreement, the US will not have achieved anything useful from Trump’s tariffs.
Martin Feldstein, a professor of economics at Harvard University and president emeritus of the US National Bureau of Economic Research, chaired then-US president Ronald Reagan’s council of economic advisers from 1982 to 1984. In 2006, he was appointed to then-US president George W. Bush’s foreign intelligence advisory board and in 2009 was appointed to Obama’s economic recovery advisory board. He is on the board of directors of the US Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the Group of 30 non-profit.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder