Wed, Feb 20, 2019 - Page 9 News List

Democracy is more than voting or protests, it is engagement

By Sasha Fisher

For over a decade now, we have witnessed more elections and, simultaneously, less democracy. According to Bloomberg, elections have been occurring more frequently around the world. Yet Freedom House found that 110 countries have experienced declines in political and civil rights over the past 13 years.

As democracy declines, so does our sense of community. In the US, this is evidenced by a looming loneliness epidemic and the rapid disappearance of civic institutions such as churches, eight of which close every day. Though these trends are global in nature, the US exemplifies them in the extreme.

This is no coincidence. As Alexis de Tocqueville pointed out in the 1830s, the US’ founders envisioned a country governed not by shared values, but by self-interest. That vision has since defined the US’ institutions, and fostered a hyper-individualistic society.

A few years ago, when I was launching Spark MicroGrants in East Africa, I watched a group of US students from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology meet with about 50 residents of a Rwandan village who were hoping to convince the Rwandan government to contribute to a project to extend an electricity line to their community (which, to their credit, they eventually did).

One student grilled a community member about why the government, rather than the residents, should pay for the project.

The student was channeling a typically US idea of privatization and access based on individual purchasing power, but that idea can corrode collective and civic engagement, and it seems to be undermining political trust as well.

According to the Pew Research Center, the share of Americans who trust the government dropped by a 55 percentage points between 1958 and 2017, and now sits below 20 percent. Not surprisingly, engagement has also dropped in the same period, with involvement in civic associations falling by half.

Growing distrust in governing institutions has fueled a rise in authoritarian populist movements around the world. Citizens are demanding individual economic security and retreating into an isolationist mentality.

In the 2016 US presidential election, US Senator Bernie Sanders and businessman Donald Trump appealed to an overlapping bloc of voters who are fed up with “the system,” and second and third-generation immigrants turned against newer immigrants.

In countries ranging from Germany to Brazil, voters have flocked to far-right parties not out of love for the candidates, but out of fear of losing power and status.

Yet we know that “user engagement” works, as shown by countless studies and human experiences. For example, in Uganda, an evaluation showed that the more citizens participated in the design of health programs, the more the perception of the healthcare system improved. Direct citizen involvement in the Indonesian government decisionmaking led to higher satisfaction with government services.

By creating more opportunities to engage in civic and political life, we can strengthen trust in our institutions and stem extremism.

Today, though, engagement happens in fits and starts related to political campaigns and policies, such as then US-senator Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign or the Tea Party movement that emerged to oppose him.

After mass shootings, protests in favor of gun-control laws increase, but after a short while, the National Rifle Association exploits fears of government overreach to encourage engagement in the other direction.

This story has been viewed 1694 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top