When Uzbek authorities detained several online advocates in September, blogger Davronbek Tojialiyev packed some clothes in a bag and waited for the knock on his door.
The police never came and Tojialiyev, one of a handful of bloggers breaking taboos by criticizing state policies and officials, writes on.
The 34-year-old’s experience suggests that the new government in Tashkent is willing to make concessions as it vows to ease restrictions that made Uzbeks wary of speaking freely for the past 25 years.
However, the detention of the bloggers shows that the change has limits, even as Uzbekistan tries to project a more liberal image to foreign investors, whose help it needs to revive the economy after years of stagnation.
The government is still sensitive to challenges to its authority, including in the sphere of religion.
The country was rocked by bombings in the late 1990s and early 2000s that were blamed on Muslim militants, and by an armed uprising in 2005 in which hundreds of people were killed.
Tojialiyev said that mixed messages from the state on freedom of expression are unlikely to stop people like him from pushing the boundaries.
“I was not afraid [of arrest], but I was ready for it,” he said with a smile.
Public criticism of the government was unthinkable under former Uzbek president Islam Karimov, who ran the Muslim-majority former Soviet republic from 1989 until his death in 2016.
Critics, such as journalist Yusuf Ruzimuradov, spent years in prison on charges related to public security and inciting rebellion. Ruzimuradov was released in March last year after 19 years behind bars.
“During Karimov’s time, bloggers could write only about small issues, mostly social,” said Tojialiyev, whose day job is running ziyouz.uz, a catalog of Uzbek literature. “It was not possible to talk about serious and political subjects.”
Karimov’s successor, Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev, has proclaimed a new era of openness and freedom of the press, and moved to curb the powers of the security forces.
“I regard as real journalists the ones who expose ... bureaucracy, indifference, extortion, corruption,” he said in remarks published by his office last year.
“There needs to be plurality of opinions in the national media space,” he said.
The Uzbek Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which answers all queries from the international media, including to the police, did not reply to a request for comment.
Mirziyoyev’s approach has improved Uzbekistan’s image abroad and helped it start rebuilding ties with institutions such as the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which had in effect withdrawn from the country under Karimov.
US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross praised “the successful political and democratic reforms that are under way in Uzbekistan” on a visit to Tashkent last week.
“The types of reforms the president has embraced here are essential to establishing the certitude that companies need to open operations in the local economy,” he told the American-Uzbek Chamber of Commerce Business Forum.
Bordering Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Afghanistan, the country of 33 million produces gold, natural gas and oil. One of its selling points to foreign investors is as a stepping stone between Russia and China.
However, some of the government’s steps have been clumsy.
Journalists from Russia who visited Tashkent this month as members of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s media pool, including a Reuters reporter, were told not to leave their hotels without official minders “for their own safety.”
The Uzbek blogosphere has expanded since the election in December 2016 of Mirziyoyev, who was prime minister under Karimov.
Bloggers, writing mostly on Facebook, question policies they see as excessively strict or unnecessary.
Mirziyoyev himself has a Facebook page, as do many senior officials, although less than 3 percent of Uzbeks regularly visit Facebook.
One story that went viral was that of a young teacher killed by a truck while cleaning up a highway ahead of a presidential visit in March last year, part of a mass mobilization of public-sector workers by provincial authorities.
Mirziyoyev quickly responded to the outcry, telling reporters that he felt responsible for the woman’s death and ordering his subordinates to stop what he called “window-dressing.”
“Bloggers have become the moving force, not only in social networks, but in society as well,” Tojialiyev said. “If they raise certain issues, the government is forced to address them.”
In several cases, authorities have punished low-level officials after bloggers helped spread news of abuse of power, such as a district mayor filmed beating headmasters for failing to bring enough people to a national holiday event.
On Monday last week, Mirziyoyev sacked a deputy prime minister who was criticized on social media after a photograph showed his subordinates standing knee-deep in a ditch full of water as a punishment. The announcement did not mention the photograph, but it followed an online outcry.
It was successes like these that emboldened about a dozen young male bloggers, mainly focused on religious issues, to criticize a draft of school uniform regulations in June that disallowed hijabs.
After the government enacted the regulations in August, bloggers cried foul and some called for protests. They were joined by Fazliddin Parpiyev, imam of one of Tashkent’s mosques.
The pushback was swift. Police arrested at least eight bloggers and the imam was dismissed.
Parpiyev told reporters he remains out of work after refusing to apologize.
One of the detained bloggers, Adham Olimov, told reporters that a court sentenced him to 15 days of administrative arrest on charges of disobeying police orders.
He and others were out of jail by the middle of September.
“Things have improved... Under Karimov, we would have been sent to prison for 15-20 years,” said another blogger, who asked not to be named so as to avoid further problems.
However, the blogger added: “I am now avoiding sensitive issues. I have a family... Blogging is not worth going to jail for.”
Yet Tojialiyev said he would continue to write about the school uniform issue and criticized the response as going against the spirit of liberal reforms.
“There was no official explanation or response from the government on what was going on,” he said.
“We live in a democratic society or we claim to have one, but what happened was not in line with our claim — for example, arresting bloggers on trumped-up charges, not informing relatives about the whereabouts of the detainees and so on,” he said.
Tojialiyev said he has not experienced any pressure or intimidation from the authorities, but friends have tried to persuade him to be more careful about sensitive issues.
“We can no longer see the bravery and fury which used to be there [in the blogosphere] months ago,” he said. “Bloggers have once again started writing about minor and old matters.”
While Tojialiyev’s optimism might have wavered, his determination has not.
“I know that what I am doing is not a crime and perhaps that’s why I am not afraid. Also, public and international pressure is a factor now. Maybe this gives me some confidence,” he said.
Additional reporting by Polina Nikolskaya;
Writing by Olzhas Auyezov; Editing by Sonya Hepinstall
The Comedy Club on Fuxing N Road in Taipei was vandalized with paint bombs mixed with feces on May 29, allegedly because one of its performers had satirized Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The incident has triggered concerns about the growing threat from China’s cross-border repression within Taiwan. On the day of the attack, a comedian surnamed Huang (黃), who is known for mocking Xi, was the headline performer. The Comedy Club founder said the assault was obviously politically motivated. China, which Freedom House said “conducts the most sophisticated, extensive and far-reaching campaign of transnational repression in the world,” has
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) at a press conference last week repeated the same, tired line, claiming that Taiwan’s future should be “decided jointly by the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people, including Taiwan compatriots.” The statement is absurd. Virtually every word is incorrect, with some parts mistaken to an astonishing degree. First, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never included Taiwan. When the Republic of China’s (ROC) original five-colored flag was established in 1912, Taiwan was still under Japanese rule. When the PRC was founded in 1949, Taiwan was under the control of president Chiang
Following the outbreak of conflict in Iran, TikTok was flooded with videos targeting Taiwanese users. Many featured artificial intelligence (AI)-generated anchors posing as Taiwanese broadcasters with localized traditional Chinese subtitles. The videos warned of imminent social collapse due to liquefied natural gas shortages, blamed the Democratic Progressive Party and its alleged failed energy policies for a fabricated crisis, and used recycled footage from unrelated events to create the impression Taiwan stood on the edge of systemic breakdown. By saturating the information environment with falsehoods or selectively edited material designed to trigger emotional responses, malign actors can exploit cognitive vulnerabilities and
Taiwan’s leading position in the global semiconductor industry is not, as some claim, based on misconceptions, a result of “stealing.” It was built upon formal, transparent and costly technology transfer agreements between the Taiwanese government and US enterprises half a century ago. According to the oral history of Hu Ding-hua (胡定華), a pioneer in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, the origin of Taiwan’s integrated circuit (IC) technology dates back to the “IC pilot factory” in the 1970s. The implementation of this project fully complied with international commercial standards and legal procedures. First, the project completed formal contract signing and payment. In 1975,
RSS