The plastic straw dilemma
The Taipei Times reported that the Environmental Protection Administration on June 8 announced that plastic straws will be banned next year to protect the environment (“Straw dilemma grips the nation,” June 17, page 3).
It is a problem for people: How will they drink beverages? Taiwanese like drinking beverages, especially bubble tea, a signature drink of Taiwan. Foreign visitors also love it.
If the single-use plastic straw is banned, tea shops will encounter a big problem.
In my opinion, plastic straws can be banned, but it should be in stages.
The problem with the policy is that there is no clear and united explanation, methods of enforcement provided by the government, or a buffer period.
Therefore, people cannot accept the new policy under such an uncertain situation.
Moreover, the government should provide a more effective plan for people to pass through the transition period.
A politician said that people could use spoons to drink bubble tea. I think this is very irresponsible.
Indeed, there are some stores that provide recyclable straws for customers.
However, the problem with stainless steel straws is that they are harder than plastic straws, and it might cause serious harm to people.
For example, Taiwanese like drinking beverages when they are walking. If they fall, the straws will hurt their mouth and cause a hemorrhage. Also, Starbucks recycles stainless steel straws in the US, Canada and China, because four children got hurt.
Furthermore, some factories already have the techniques to produce eco-friendly straws with alternative materials.
However, eco-friendly straws mentioned in the news are not easily found on the market.
People cannot find stainless steel straws or glass straws in convenience stores.
They can be found in certain shops cooperating with the straw brand, and cost about NT$300 for a whole set with different sizes.
If people want to buy a famous brand, it costs about NT$1,000 for a set.
Following the global trend is a good thing, and it is undeniable that the environment should be protected.
However, the government also needs to think about how to promote its policy, make a clear and reasonable explanation to let people accept it and find a plan to implement it gradually.
Otherwise, the policy cannot be implemented well.
Chii Wang
New Taipei City
Taiwanese need to unite
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on June 13 met with US Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs Marie Royce. The purpose was to open a dialogue on how Taiwan can work closer with the US.
During the meeting, Tsai complimented the US on its support in many aspects, especially during this difficult time in the face of Chinese aggression.
Also, the US said that it would unceasingly strive to guarantee Taiwan’s ability to have a voice in international contexts.
I have to say that Taiwanese are really in a difficult time, even with the guarantee from the US.
China in March announced 31 preferential policies for Taiwan to draw skilled Taiwanese. The announcement affected many industries in Taiwan and we could see China’s ambition to strengthen their international competitiveness as well as weaken Taiwan’s.
Also, two countries, the Dominican Republic and Burkina Faso last month severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan, which made Taiwan hopeless in terms of diplomacy.
However, it is during this difficult time that we Taiwanese have to stand up and unite. I do not mean that we cannot collaborate with the US or the US is unreliable. The point is that we cannot just rely on the US.
Instead of wasting money on useless diplomatic relations, why not invest the money on education to cultivate more intellectuals? Instead of building facilities that are doomed to be deserted, why not increase the budget on some young, but promising entrepreneurs or industries? Instead of being passive and intimidated, why not collaborate with more reliable allies and display more of our advantages that allow us to speak louder in front of other countries, including China?
Taiwanese must stand up and unite during this difficult time. I am happy to see Taiwan work closely with the US. But, we can do more meaningful and useful investment on education, entrepreneurship and industries to improve our competitiveness.
I cannot include them all, but the government can. If the government initiates making some difference, it would be more powerful and complete. In this way, we can definitely be more self-reliant and competitive.
Sampson Chiou
Taipei
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s