Taiwan has been restricted by the “one China” policy in international politics for decades. Taiwanese know that there is a barrier between Taiwan and international society.
Between 2000 and 2015, the UN implemented its Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which included improving poverty to halting the spread of HIV/AIDS and providing universal primary education, based on a blueprint agreed to by all 193 UN member states and the world’s leading development institutions.
Although Taiwan is not a UN member, it still examined gender performance in 2014 according to the eight MDGs and presented the results at the UN’s Commission on the Status of Women NGO forum side events.
Taiwan did not have a plan to reach the MDGs, but we performed well on MDG No. 5 (improving maternal health) and MDG No. 4 (reducing child mortality).
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agreed to by UN member states in 2015, and complemented by commitments made in the Paris Agreement, map out economic, social and environmental objectives to be achieved by 2030 — the so-called “2030 agenda.” Assisting nations in creating governmental policies, the SDGs highlight 17 goals and 169 targets, with the goals focusing on “sustainability” and “partnership,” which are important values for Taiwan, too.
Taiwan has excellent experience in implementing gender mainstreaming policies. The government has promoted a “gender mainstreaming national policy” since 2005, the last time the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was in power. The policy is improving Taiwan’s gender equality status, especially political participation among women.
It is a good model for introducing global programs to Taiwan, as well as encouraging other nations and organizations. For example, online reports on the passage of the same-sex marriage law received more than 10 million hits in one day, and helped improved people’s understanding of Taiwan.
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) DPP administration has passed the Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program to build a new generation of infrastructure for the nation’s future.
The program, which was promulgated by the president on July 7, comprises eight categories of infrastructure projects and will be funded by a special budget of NT$420 billion (US$13.9 billion) over four years.
The program’s water environment project is a response to SDG No. 6 (clean water and sanitation), while the “green” energy infrastructure project is a response to SDG No. 7 (affordable and clean energy) and SDG No. 13 (climate action).
The program’s railway project, urban and rural projects and digital infrastructure projects are responses to SDG No. 8 (decent work and economic growth), SDG No. 9 (industry, innovation and infrastructure), SDG No. 10 (reduced inequality) and SDG No. 11 (sustainable cities and communities).
The food safety project, non-profit kindergartens and the construction of long-term care institutions in rural projects are responses to SDG No. 3 (good health and well-being). The railway project could enhance SDG No. 5 (gender equality) and school construction in rural projects promotes SDG No. 4 (quality education).
Even pension reform, judicial system reform and a nuclear-free homeland, Tsai’s most important political manifestos, respond to SDG No. 10 (reduced inequality), SDG No. 16 (peace, justice and strong institutions), SDG No. 7 (affordable and clean energy) and SDG No. 12 (responsible consumption and production).
Taiwanese are building a national vision in response to sustainable global development and international partnerships — not only to take responsibility in being part of international society, but also to share the nation’s excellent technological achievements.
The SDGs are shared among nations and institutions cooperating to achieve the 2030 agenda, and Taiwan is one important partner of this mission.
Lin Ching-yi is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator and chairperson of the Legislative Yuan Advisory Council on UN Sustainability Development Goals (立法院聯合國永續發展諮詢委員會).
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.