Trade is more contentious now than it has been for decades. Since their heyday during the 1980s and 1990s — which saw the creation of the WTO, the birth of North American Free Trade Agreement and China’s rapid integration into the global economy — international trading relationships have fallen into an uneasy state of flux.
From the US’ decision to pull out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, to negotiations over Britain’s future relationship with the EU, and even a trans-Atlantic debate about chlorinated chicken, trade is at the heart of public discourse and it is proving divisive.
On the face of it, trade activity looks healthy. The number of containers traversing the world’s shipping lanes is rising steadily after a sharp shock during the financial crisis. Yet, the value of the goods they contain is dropping as commodity prices struggle. Before the crisis, trade was growing faster than GDP.
Now it is not, buffeted by a dangerous mix of economic and political headwinds.
Some are being tempted by the argument that trade is the primary cause of inequality and that the system is run by global elites who work against national interests.
This narrative is fundamentally wrong. It threatens global peace and prosperity by encouraging policymakers to resort to protectionism at a time when the world urgently needs more trade liberalization, not less, to tackle the great socioeconomic issues of today and tomorrow.
All advocates of free and fair trade need to repel this false narrative and regain the initiative, which means doing three things.
The first is to explain that trade exists because people want it to. At its heart is the simple concept of comparative advantage, whereby a community that can produce goods others need is empowered to sell to those buyers and so afford to buy the goods it needs in return.
Maritime trade was how cutlers made my home city of Sheffield, England, into the steel capital of the world, and how those same cutlers were able to buy imported goods such as tea, cotton and rubber.
Digital trade is how we can now buy Hollywood blockbusters from video-on-demand platforms hosted on servers a continent away. Trade is not just about physical goods, it is increasingly about services too, which are being made more tradable by technology.
Trade is essential for prosperity, stability and security.
According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, manufacturing workers in countries that are relatively open to trade earn between three and nine times more than their peers in closed economies.
Half a century ago, Southeast Asia was tearing itself apart, but this year the ASEAN bloc celebrates its 50th anniversary. Through cooperation and commerce, the member states have collectively built the world’s seventh-biggest economy and by 2030 we expect ASEAN to rank third.
The second thing we need to do is to acknowledge that the benefits of trade have not been shared evenly, so we must find policy solutions that rebuild trust by supporting wealth distribution and protecting the vulnerable.
Rather than leaving responsibility for the displaced solely to governments, businesses must play a greater role in a world where technology is already revolutionizing how we live and work.
Paying tax is not enough; companies need to collaborate with governments to develop education and labor markets that give workers the skills and protections they need to succeed.
The third thing is to ensure we have legal and regulatory frameworks that optimize access to trade. This means making procedures, standards and agreements simpler and more consistent so it is easier for companies to conduct cross-border business.
It also means ensuring that capital regulation encourages trade finance by recognizing its low risk profile, enabling financial institutions to fill more of the estimated US$1.7 trillion gap in unmet demand for trade finance.
Trade is not a panacea for all the world’s problems, but its power to create prosperity is enormous. This, fundamentally, is why I take a glass half-full view of the future.
Some unstoppable trends are already in motion that will advance trade and increase prosperity in the 21st century. E-commerce is empowering businesses to sell to customers in countries without ever setting foot there. Over the next 30 years, the expansion of the middle classes in Asia and Africa will lift 3 billion people out of poverty.
Asia-led initiatives are building a more integrated global economy — such as the single market of the ASEAN Economic Community and China’s Belt and Road Initiative, which has halved the time it takes for goods to travel between the UK and China by rail.
However, only by repairing trust in trade, and by creating a better and fairer system, can we take advantage of these trends.
We have an opportunity today to create a new era for trade — where negative perceptions are dispelled, where gains are distributed more evenly and where access is increased on an unprecedented scale. The result will be a better and brighter future for us all.
Natalie Blyth is global head of trade and receivables finance at HSBC.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused