A series of scandals involving corporate corruption, breach of trust and money laundering have focused public attention on issues concerning corporate governance. This is a good time to scrutinize and rethink the duties and supervisory responsibilities of independent directors and consider how common it has become for companies to have the majority of their shares controlled by a handful of top executives, who tend to have a complex relationship with independent directors.
As part of corporate governance, the position of independent board directors needs to be strengthened to balance the power of controlling shareholders.
According to reports in the past two or three years by the Taiwan Institute of Directors and PricewaterhouseCoopers Taiwan on family-owned businesses in the Chinese-speaking world, more than 70 percent of the several thousand listed companies in Taiwan are family-owned. The reports also showed that the average lifespan of a family-owned business is about 30 years and the family on average owns more than 30 percent of all outstanding shares.
On Taiwan’s financial market, controlling shareholders generally control the business operations and the strategic direction of their companies. However, when it comes to making many important business decisions, such as the appointment and reappointment of members on the board of directors, executive compensation and internal audit, the board of directors — which is in charge of supervision and management — still needs to rely on independent directors whose job it is to provide rational and unbiased assessments of the business and its operations.
Nonetheless, many controlling shareholders in family-owned businesses in Taiwan not only control the day-to-day operations of their companies, they also enjoy considerable room to maneuver over the appointment and reappointment of board members, which in turn gives them power over the evaluation of the expertise of independent directors.
This is a loophole that has been left open and ignored by all corporate supervisory systems, laws and regulations as well as security listing guidelines. As a result, it has become necessary to take steps to enhance the role of independent directors in companies.
First, at the very least, smaller shareholders should have the power to veto decisions regarding the appointment and reappointment of independent directors made by controlling shareholders, and perhaps they could even be given the right to vote down controlling shareholders by simply outnumbering them, ignoring the number of shares they represent.
In addition, independent directors should be part of the key minority on the board of directors that are responsible for overseeing and reviewing important business decisions that could lead to conflicts of interest for the company’s controlling shareholders.
Examples of such decisions could be managing executive compensation and internal auditing. Controlling shareholders should not be able to intervene in the nomination, appointment, election and reelection of independent directors.
By introducing these changes, companies would be able to enhance the role of independent directors in overseeing important decisions.
Since strengthening the position of independent directors would mean that they could be appointed by the votes of a larger number of smaller shareholders, small shareholders would be able to prevent controlling shareholders from making biased decisions by voting against or vetoing them based on their own personal interests.
Major decisions that do not pose a conflict of interest for controlling shareholders can still be left to them and other top executives to decide. Overall, this would make the competition for power on the board of directors more balanced.
Andy Yeh is the chief financial architect of Brass Ring International Density Enterprise.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
RSS