US President Donald Trump is under investigation for alleged inappropriate contacts with Russia, and prior to that, it was revealed that Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn had spoken to Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak about the sanctions placed on Russia late last year by then-US president Barack Obama’s administration.
Flynn urged Russia not to overreact to the sanctions and wait for a review of the matter after Trump took office. For this reason, he was forced to tender his resignation.
Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who serves as a senior presidential adviser, is also being investigated as part of the FBI inquiry.
However, Trump continued to leak confidential antiterrorism information to Kislyak about the Islamic State group that had been provided by a US ally. He even fired former FBI director James Comey, allegedly to prevent the bureau from investigating further.
Trump’s “Russia-gate” is reminiscent of then-US president Richard Nixon’s mission for his national security adviser Henry Kissinger to secretly visit China in 1971, which paved the way for Nixon’s China visit and the resumption of Sino-US relations.
There are of course differences between the two cases. The biggest difference is that Nixon started pushing for a pro-China policy during his presidency, while Trump was in contact with Russia during the election campaign.
If it had not been for Trump’s unsophisticated approach, it seems to be strategically necessary for Washington to turn from the policy of working with China against Russia toward working with Russia against China.
The key issue is whether Trump gained personal benefit or benefits for his family through his contacts with Russia.
During the Cold War, many Americans looked upon Russia as their primary enemy. The thinking has to a large extent remained unchanged to this day.
In particular, the US’ European allies are looking on Russia as the greatest threat to their national security, not to mention that Russian President Vladimir Putin has displayed some of the hegemonic attitudes of the red empire.
However, from the perspective of global strategy, the primary enemy of Western democracies is China, not Russia, because China is much stronger than Russia economically and Beijing is quickly catching up with Moscow in terms of military strength.
Putin’s goal is to merely maintain Moscow’s sphere of influence, while Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “Chinese dream” is to build a “celestial empire.”
From the Soviet Union to Russia and from then-Soviet minister of foreign affairs Vyacheslav Molotov to Russia’s ambassadors to the UN, Russia often exercises its veto power at the UN Security Council and is therefore seen as a foe by Western democracies.
However, China prefers to deceive Western nations by abstaining at the UN Security Council, complying with them publicly, but opposing them in private. As a result, it has been seen as a friend by the West.
Russia finds itself at a semi-democratic stage following the collapse of the previous authoritarian regime, while China is moving toward a militarist, fascist empire, becoming the world’s main source of war.
If Trump can handle “Russia-gate” with a bit more finesse, that could serve as an important step toward changes in global strategy.
Meanwhile, China is adopting a global fifth-column strategy around the world. If a “China-gate” were to occur in the US political arena, that would pose the greatest of all threats to US national security.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s