US President Donald Trump’s protectionist threats against China have spurred much concern. If he follows through on his promises and officially labels China a currency manipulator or imposes higher import tariffs, the short-run consequences — including a trade war — could be serious. However, in the longer term, a turn toward protectionism by the US could be a blessing in disguise for China.
China is going through a difficult phase in its development. After three decades of double-digit GDP growth the pace of China’s economic expansion has slowed markedly. The combination of rising labor costs and weaker demand for Chinese exports has reduced China’s annual GDP growth to 6.9 percent in 2015 and 6.7 percent last year. The Chinese government has now lowered its growth target for last year to 2020 to 6.5 percent to 7 percent.
This is still a respectable pace, but it is not the best China could do. As Justin Yifu Lin (林毅夫) and Wing Thye Woo (胡永泰) have said, in 1951 — when Japan’s per capita income relative to that of the US was the same as China’s is today — Japan was experiencing sustained growth of 9.2 percent.
One impediment to such growth for China is a heavy debt burden.
A stress-test analysis by the McKinsey Global Institute found that if China continued to pursue its debt and investment-led growth model, the ratio of nonperforming loans could rise from 1.7 percent today — according to official figures — to 15 percent in just two years. That said, the risk of nonperforming loans is not news to the People’s Bank of China, which will, the evidence suggests, take steps to mitigate it.
Unfortunately, debt is not China’s only problem. Its dominance in global exports — the main engine of its growth in recent decades — has eroded. India’s trade-to-GDP ratio overtook China’s last year. In addition, while labor productivity is rising steadily in China, it remains less than 30 percent of advanced-nation levels.
Given these challenges, it might seem strange to assert that China could be on the verge of ascending to a new level of global influence. However, because of Trump’s approach, China has a new and important opportunity to do just that.
While trade and capital flows require regulation, openness —on balance — does vastly more good than harm. Trump’s “neo-protectionist” policies — which aim to limit the flow of goods, services, and people to the US — are rooted in nothing other than myopic xenophobia. In the end, this will isolate the US far more than China or Mexico.
History bears this out. On the eve of World War I, Argentina was among the world’s wealthiest countries, behind the US, but ahead of Germany. Since then, Argentina’s economy has deteriorated substantially for two reasons: inadequate investment in education — a mistake that Trump might also make — and heightened protectionism.
The rise of nationalism in the 1920s culminated in 1930, when far-right nationalist forces overthrew Argentina’s government. The new government — which was bitterly opposed to liberalism, not to mention foreigners — raised tariffs sharply in several sectors. On average, import tariffs rose from 16.7 percent in 1930 to 28.7 percent in 1933. Jobs in traditional sectors were saved, but productivity declined. Today, Argentina is not even among the top 50 economies worldwide.
So Trump’s policy approach can be expected to do great damage to the US economy and have far-reaching implications, given the US’ prominent global role. However, self-imposed economic isolation, combined with an inward-looking “America first” foreign-policy approach, would also create space for other countries — including China, India and Mexico — to increase their own international clout.
Consider Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the mega-regional trade deal involving 12 nations in the Asia-Pacific region, but not China. The TPP certainly had its flaws — not least that it would have conferred disproportionate and unfair benefits on large corporations. However, it had plenty of redeeming qualities and was being celebrated in nations such as Malaysia and Vietnam for the access it would give to the US market.
Now that the rug beneath these nations’ feet has been pulled out, China can lend a helping hand. Already, China has boosted its regional investments considerably, including through its “One Belt, One Road” initiative. Without the TPP facilitating capital flows among its member nations, China is likely to overtake the US as the largest source of foreign direct investment for ASEAN members. China is also seeking to deepen its economic ties with TPP signatories Australia and New Zealand.
Likewise, China has seized the opportunity afforded by Trump’s ill-conceived plan to build a wall on the US border with Mexico to reach out to the US’ southern neighbor. A little more than one month after Trump’s election, Chinese State Councilor Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪) met with Mexican Minister of Foreign Affairs Claudia Ruiz Massieu and pledged to deepen diplomatic ties and increase flight connections and trade. China is already Brazil’s top trading partner. It can now aim for the same position in Mexico, and perhaps all of Latin America.
As Trump adopts increasingly closed-minded and xenophobic rhetoric, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is toning down his nationalist language and sounding increasingly like a global statesman. China, he seems to recognize, now faces the chance not just to achieve another round of economic expansion, but also to secure a far more prominent role in global decisionmaking.
Kaushik Basu, a former chief economist of the World Bank, is a professor of economics at Cornell University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s